PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

The only question I have is how do we remunerate pep for his outspoken contribution to the free city cause.Maybe set up a company called…”cuz we’ve got guardiola” and pay monies into that from HH Man-sour. Transfer it through our newly formed 1st Abu Dhabi concealed owner investment bank. -:)
 
We've always stood alone. In the 80s/90s we were treated as the little brother, everyone felt sympathy who was standing in the shadow of the big bully of a brother.

And then fate gave us this incredible twist. Our little club, our club that had gone through pain after pain got given a life line like no other. We won the lottery of owners. We found a group that cares for not just the club but the city and people too. Day by day the Glazers plunge the rags further into debt, Daniel Levy goes about his day making promises to people then reneges on them. The scouse yanks watch as their thugs break buses and throw coins at children.

But no the biggest crime is that the little club everyone pitied has finally risen to its own heights. That they've worked their bollocks off to move through transitions. That cartel has spent so long reaping the profits of pushing for the PL breakaway, of never being challenged that they forgot their own dirt is right there for the digging. And the white paper has got them completely in a tizzy, they know just how much shit they could find themselves in, I think they might be about to find out their best course of action was silence.

But let us be the David and them the Goliath. Let us bring them crashing back down to earth
 
They cut away as soon as he said that Khaldoon and Feran were even more confident than before
In Finland at the mo and keeping in touch with stuff via blue moon only and have to say I am loving what I am reading We are blessed to have the owners, players and certainly the manager we have City from 6 years old an now 59 an thought ide seen it all CMON CITY
 
What's that saying about it being at its darkest just before the Dawn?

The season and City have been reborn this lunchtime.

He spoke for us, now we must speak for him on Sunday and the rest of the season.

Win the fucking lot.

We can pay no bigger compliment than saying he spoke exactly how we would as Blues.

I'm so ready for Sunday.

Pep's finest hour.

Abso fucking lutely
 
I'd certainly name the East Stand after him. And the North Stand should be the Sergio Aguero End. It's not right that three of our stands are not named after club legends. It's right that we have a stand named after Colin Bell but the majority of fans never got to see him play.
The Aguero End - brilliant!
 
Obviously haven't read all 1000+ pages (!) but there seems to be a debate over whether an appeal to the High Court would be possible (if needed).

I'm no lawyer but I thought I'd research the options.

Under PL rule X.37 "Challenging the Award", it specifically forbids any legal appeal on a Point Of Law.

However, with reference to the Arbitration Act 1996, the PL rules allow legal appeals for other reasons, such as :

- Insubstantive Jurisdiction.
I don't think anyone can argue that the PL don't have jurisdication in this case.

- Procedural Errors during the hearing.
I doubt the PL's own expensive lawyers would be that stupid, although I'm sure our lawyers will be watching their every move.

It's under Section 68, "Serious Irregularity", that things could get interesting.

I'll replicate the wording of S68 so people can read for themselves. I'm sure we'll all have thoughts on how some of these clauses could apply themselves to the way our case has been handled, evidence obtained etc.

"Serious irregularity means an irregularity of one or more of the following kinds which the court considers has caused or will cause substantial injustice to the applicant -

(a) failure by the tribunal to comply with section 33 (general duty of tribunal);
(b) the tribunal exceeding its powers;
(c) failure by the tribunal to conduct the proceedings in accordance with the procedure agreed by the parties;
(d) failure by the tribunal to deal with all the issues that were put to it;
(e) any arbitral or other institution or person vested by the parties with powers in relation to the proceedings or the award exceeding its powers;
(f) uncertainty or ambiguity as to the effect of the award;
(g) the award being obtained by fraud or the award or the way in which it was procured being contrary to public policy;
(h) failure to comply with the requirements as to the form of the award; or
(i) any irregularity in the conduct of the proceedings or in the award which is admitted by the tribunal or by any arbitral or other institution or person vested by the parties with powers in relation to the proceedings or the award."
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top