PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

RayCTID said:
I wouldn't put it beyond the media to do that.
Click to expand...
It is routine for stories to be released at a time which that guarantees the biggest exposure and the maximum commercial opportunity. In the clickbait world a narrative which generates a huge audience of people who dislike MCFC (especially from a worldwide army of MUFC and LFC fans) is hugely valuable. Some of the obvious media trolls like Nick Harris and Delaney are making a living on the back of this negative narrative.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Pablo ZZZ Peroni said:
Harris schooled by stefan yet again.


View attachment 72192
Click to expand...

These are things that Harris would know if he had any kind of genuine expertise in his professed specialist area, so his errors speak volumes. And he then goes on, later in the discussion, to retort in the manner shown in the tweet below. I'd regard those responses as lame even if they came from a child.



The whole dialogue between the two of them reads like exactly what it is: an exchange between, on the one hand, a serious professional person who's eminent in his field and knows what he's talking about (Stefan), and, on the other hand, a bad-faith fucking simpleton (Harris).

EDIT - To make crystal clear which is which, though I hope people realised anyway! ;)
 
Last edited:
I just can't see a situation where we will be allowed to come out of this with our reputation in tact, there is such a huge will for us to be found guilty. You only have to look at how the CAS decision was interpreted. Other than us City fans everyone thinks that we escaped on a technicality.

What concerns me most about all of this is that there is no avenue of appeal, we are going to be fucked over here and I just hope that when we do we go on the offensive and blow the lid on the whole thing.

We must have so much shit on the establishment and truly believe we are just keeping our powder dry.
 
projectriver said:
I'm always polite I think. No reason for him to block me. And he respects my (biased) views even if he is resistant to them.
Click to expand...
He’s probably learnt a thing or two from you, but he’s dug a hole so deep now there’s no chance of accepting that he’s wrong. He blocks polite City fans who don’t have the same opinion as him.
 
projectriver said:
I'm always polite I think. No reason for him to block me. And he respects my (biased) views even if he is resistant to them.
Click to expand...

I really don’t understand why he gets into the argument about a settlement. He either understands but won’t admit that he’s wrong or he doesn’t understand how a settlement works. Not a good look either way.
 
Keeper! said:
We have actively looked for a new shirt/stadium sponsor for a considerable period and have employed an agency to do so.

No takers, incredible for a club so well run and so successful.

Our brand IS tainted in the UK and anyone is kidding themselves if they think any other.
Click to expand...
This may be the case or not although I am with you on this.
Another option is that City are happy to continue temporarily extending the Etihad stadium sponsorship for another three years in order to secure a Mega Mega Mega* new sponsorship deal when the North-stand is complete to maximise it's revenue?

*AKA "Massive"
 
Last edited:
He cant block me as I won't engage with him or their like with their puerile bullshit. I'll leave the responses to those who know how to get at these purveyors of lies with truth and knowledge, something they seem to lack deliberately as it suits their agenda and no nowt audience.
They live off clicks and views, simply don't give them any and laugh at their pathetic attempts at fending off Citys finest when their BS is shown to be the utter bollocks it is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top