The Harry and Meghan fuss

Hamann Pineapple said:
I hope he takes down Murdoch and sends Morgan to prison, they are our enemy and hate us
Click to expand...
They hate everybody and use the influence of the media for their own means. They don’t employ real journalists, they employ influencers who shape the narrative.

No wonder Joe Bloggs hasn’t got a clue. We are thinking about today while the super rich are sorting themselves out for tomorrow.
 
bluethrunthru said:
If only Chopper Harris was alive they could recreate him as Casemiro stamping on Akanji's foot to win a free kick

Click to expand...


Sky News really is a perverse channel, it's a well polished GB News pretending to be mainstream.

And Most of the worst instances of on air gauping and tugging themselves off at news stories that are made for rolling coverage have been on this channel.
 
Trickyblues said:
What was tacky about the Netflix? And at which point did he slag his family off in his ‘shit’ best selling book? :)
Click to expand...
You mean the book where he published private text messages without the other member of the royal family’s consent or prior knowledge, all in order to boost sales?

Phone hacking in fact, albeit in a different form, but that’s okay because he’s doing it I suppose? Classic narcissism.
 
Brewster's millions said:
You mean the book where he published private text messages without the other member of the royal family’s consent or prior knowledge, all in order to boost sales?

Phone hacking in fact, albeit in a different form, but that’s okay because he’s doing it I suppose? Classic narcissism.
Click to expand...
Published his OWN private text messages to correct an incorrect story already in the public domain. That’s not illegal or slagging anyone off. Maybe Kate and William should have corrected the story when it first came out instead of throwing their sister in law to the wolves.
 
Last edited:
Brewster's millions said:
You mean the book where he published private text messages without the other member of the royal family’s consent or prior knowledge, all in order to boost sales?

Phone hacking in fact, albeit in a different form, but that’s okay because he’s doing it I suppose? Classic narcissism.
Click to expand...
I didn’t think even the most rabid critics of Harry and Meghan would refer to copying texts off their own phones as phone hacking. But you’ve proved me wrong.
 
Just finished reading Harry's book Spare and I do feel for the lad. He's had to put up with a lot of shit from the media over the years and obviously they were directly responsible for his mums death.

I certainly side with him more than any bastard who thinks that hacking a dead young girls phone is okay. No-one in the media has ever been held to account for that and they should be, that's the point he's trying to make in this case.

If someone like Piers Morgan is against you on this then you're probably doing something right.
 
inbetween said:
Just finished reading Harry's book Spare and I do feel for the lad. He's had to put up with a lot of shit from the media over the years and obviously they were directly responsible for his mums death.

I certainly side with him more than any bastard who thinks that hacking a dead young girls phone is okay. No-one in the media has ever been held to account for that and they should be, that's the point he's trying to make in this case.

If someone like Piers Morgan is against you on this then you're probably doing something right.
Click to expand...

 
bluethrunthru said:
People are tired of experts ( copyright M Gove ) - this woman is deemed an expert



and don't start me off on this despicable **** - I'd have him deported back to NZ tbh

Click to expand...

Both cunts , that woman hates the couple , along with tom bower , they get lots of air time on sky and the vine show , along with that bitch malone , wish they would just fuck off
 
He doesn't seem to have nailed them on anything as of yet. A lot of things where stories were already out there, even if there's clear suspicion over where they got their information. Others certainly look quite clearly to be from hacking, but it's so difficult to prove and the paper would just say "that came from a private source".

Does anybody know what the others involved in this case have? You've got Kevin Webster (Michael Le Vell), Nikki Sanderson and Fiona Wightman all with cases which might be more clear cut you'd imagine because they're not going to be surrounded by people willing to flog their stories for a quick buck.

This really is Prince Harry's life work. Since Diana died as a result of these scum, he's wanted to stick it to them. He's openly admitted he recognises certain stories are in the public interest but that others would be interesting to the public which is quite different.

I like him, but I do wish in his book he'd risen above some of the things he went into detail over. He's lowered himself to a level he didn't need to go to and that was purely because he was advised to in order to boost book sales.
 
Trickyblues said:
Published his OWN private text messages to correct an incorrect story already in the public domain. That’s not illegal or slagging anyone off. Maybe Kate and William should have corrected the story when it first came out instead of throwing their sister in law to the wolves.
Click to expand...
He published a transcript from communications with another person who had the right to expect that the matter would remain private. The other party had no prior knowledge of the publication and did not provide any consent to do so.

The means and scale are different from phone hacking, as it’s described in the current court case, but the end result is publishing information which was intended to remain private, without the knowledge or consent of the other party.

Phone hacking is clearly wrong, as are Prince Harry’s actions. But like most things in life, he appears to think it’s okay when he does it. A bit like when he put the Nazi uniform on - somebody else’s fault, naturally - and when he routinely called his Asian colleague a ‘p**i’, even when he knew it was wrong to do so.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top