der bomber28
Well-Known Member
The meltdown if they don’t end up selling will be fookin biblical. Hahaha!
Considering a loan, you say?
Or more the case no team wants to pay United for a toxic asset, where even the United women's team have said they will strike if he ever plays for United again...
Rags will be holding a mass demonstration……..all 23 of them.The meltdown if they don’t end up selling will be fookin biblical. Hahaha!
Panic buying zebra pants haha.Rags will be holding a mass demonstration……..all 23 of them.
12 seconds in at Wembley and I thought he already was one!absolute twat behavior towards De gea, poor guy! Deserves a statue in my opinion
He has been imitating a statue recentlyabsolute twat behavior towards De gea, poor guy! Deserves a statue in my opinion
Colin - I assume the depreciation on the capex is added back when considering FFP profit?Dent can be cleared by an owner and they can also spend as much as they like on infrastructure improvements. That all goes through the balance sheet. There's no way we could've afforded to buy the players we've bought and extend the South Stand/build the CFA, without Sheikh Mansour funding the latter. So we've benefited from that.
What an owner can't do is pay excessive amounts of sponsorship, which inflates revenue in the profit and loss account.
Ten Hag has a weird habit of doing the wrong thing with these kind of things.
Marc Overmars got kicked out of Ajax for sexually harassing female employees and ten Hag backed him 100%.
Quincy Promes got arrested for attempted murder and drug smuggling and ten Hag backed him 100% and kept playing him even as damning evidence came out.
Antony's girlfriend has reported him to the police in Brazil where he's getting investigated for domestic abuse while he was at Ajax and United with ten Hag.
Now he wants to rehabilite Mason Greenwood after his girlfriend released audio of him raping her.
Yes, once it's capitalised in the balance sheet.Colin - I assume the depreciation on the capex is added back when considering FFP profit?
Ahh, is that why they refuse to mend the roof or get a new stadium?No wonder over 50% of thethousands hundredstens are hiding their faces behind banners.
I can see the Glazersquakeringlaughing at this level of protest
'What are you going to do with my 250K?'Really, the money they are siphoning out of the swamp, would have all 5 dragons fighting over a piece of the action if they could tag onto the Glazer model.
This is what happened.
(Always a good excuse to show it again)
A great day, followed by a great night in the Fletchers.
Nature now thrives in Chernobyl…nothing grows in this wasteland!Are you on a train passing through Chernobyl?
It's Manchester United we are talking about here, Man United, Man U were talking about, its Manchester United you know.Reading quite a lot recently about the status of this dump of a club. What really irks me is, this is the first time ever, that a club, as it has been presented of this size, has ever been linked with the red line of the Financial Fair Play regulations.
Now whether these are FA's or UEFA's rule structures this cannot just be a "whoops" we just got here situation. Something is absolutely stinking about that club financially, and the fact is, that from the latest news, debt is at 750 million, with 350 million still to go out in transfers from previous years. And in the last 5 years they have spent 500 million pounds in transfers but sold for 60 million.
How in the world, have these lot not been failing FFP for a while now, if they have't won anything of value in the last 10 years, red lined themselves year after year, and yet spent over a billion and a half.
Please someone with a bit more technical knowledge explain it to me. Because it really stinks to high heaven.