PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Damocles said:
Nah, I'd invite them on. All of them. I don't feel that they have the facts at their fingertips and I'd want them to justify their opinions in a fair and non-partisan way.
Click to expand...

Thing is, you're presuming they'd listen, not shout over you and not resort to catchphrases. Trust me, I've been there. It's really easy to presume you'll get a chance to have your say but they're just all professional gobshites. They double down, cut you off and gang up. I know the game they play. Facts don't matter when they're feeling a certain way. It's not good faith at all.
 
twosips said:
Thing is, you're presuming they'd listen, not shout over you and not resort to catchphrases. Trust me, I've been there. It's really easy to presume you'll get a chance to have your say but they're just all professional gobshites. They double down, cut you off and gang up. I know the game they play. Facts don't matter when they're feeling a certain way. It's not good faith at all.
Click to expand...
Good points.

You would need to have your own professionals from a media, financial and legal background then see who is brave enough to come on.
 
twosips said:
Thing is, you're presuming they'd listen, not shout over you and not resort to catchphrases. Trust me, I've been there. It's really easy to presume you'll get a chance to have your say but they're just all professional gobshites. They double down, cut you off and gang up. I know the game they play. Facts don't matter when they're feeling a certain way. It's not good faith at all.
Click to expand...
As they say ‘never let the facts get in the way of a good story’ or in this case a good money making clickbait story full of lies, innuendos and half truths at best. Wouldn’t call them professional gobshites either as there is nowt professional about them . Call them what they really are, hypocritical, lying cunts and that isn’t a word I use often.
 
Damocles said:
Ahsan (rightly) doesn't trust me on podcasts any more but I do sometimes think that I'd love to have some of these people in front of me in a live format where they couldn't dodge questions. Was thinking of doing some Youtube shit about all these issues when I have the time, I dunno.
Specific to City and their legal/financial issues. I'm no genius but I know enough smart people to present the other side of the case which I feel that we're lacking in the media.
Click to expand...
You've got my vote.
 
abu13 said:
Just out of interest I watched the Piers Morgan show, in the first minute i was laughing.

When the guy stated that we were taken over and had financial rules that we had to follow.

No we fucking didn't, when we were taken over any club could spend what they wanted, they soon shit the bed and decided to introduce rules designed to stop us.

Fuck the lot of them.
Click to expand...

Premier League FFP was introduced 2014, the CAS judgment confirmed there was no issue with the £30m paid by the 'mystery man' (which is actually no mystery at all) in 2012/2013 - so exactly what is being alleged?
 
Don’t let them bait you it’s what they want.

Ignore them and it’s yesterday’s chip paper.

If it paid City to fight they would. They are doing the right thing by giving them zero air time. It’s by far the best tactic and has worked a treat.

City concentrate on winning while others are selling up because they can’t compete having wasted years moaning about us.
 
Last edited:
twosips said:
Thing is, you're presuming they'd listen, not shout over you and not resort to catchphrases. Trust me, I've been there. It's really easy to presume you'll get a chance to have your say but they're just all professional gobshites. They double down, cut you off and gang up. I know the game they play. Facts don't matter when they're feeling a certain way. It's not good faith at all.
Click to expand...
This. For instance.

The whole George Best argument with them ends with a statement that he was world class. They won’t brook any further opinion. Cunts.

Tell them that he never played at a World Cup so how could he be considered as such and the answer is always that it wasn’t his fault. No way will they accept that the argument is that he didn’t and not that he couldn’t.

He’s perpetually held up as the greatest ever, Rico Lewis is one medal behind him, he’s behind Phil Foden and his greatest achievement is that he scored 6 goals against Skips brother.

They don’t do debate unless it’s all one way in their self entitled favour.

SCUM.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top