Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quite apart from being a dog whistle racist and Islamophobe, Colin Shindler is a terrible writer. Awful
Many years ago I spent several weeks in hospital with a destroyed leg that required multiple surgeries
Never let anyone ever say that the Harry Kane ‘making a back’ is harmless….
My then work colleagues delivered a package of books which included his collected works
Jesus Christ. What a dullard
His book about the Summerbees was virtually unreadable, riddled with repetition and old fartery, and boring as fuck
It was a good substitute to send me to sleep when the morphine drip ran out
 
Just as an aside - I keep seeing FOC being used in many threads and when I search for what it stands for I get a number of options - none of which seem relevant.

Knowing that I will be embarrassing myself with this question - can someone please tell me what it stands for
Something the Charming Man -Manuel Pellegrini- was referred to by a cockney wanker that managed the barcodes at the time. There are gifs about it that I cannot seem to find.
After that the reference became popular amongst the bluemoon FOCs
 
Mahrez just like Sterling hasn’t got a personality that connected with the fanbase despite the unbelievable contribution they both gave.

It has nothing to do with race, ethnicity, religion of nationality, it is just human personality.

SWP, Yaya, Bernarbia, Kompany, Fernandinho, even Adebayor all had the personality to connect with fans, I could name more.

The key moment you know a player connects with a fanbase is when a song is created and aired. All of the above had one.
I used to sing "Raheem Stirling is top of the league"

Guess he won't hear it again..
 
Last edited:
It’s a shame when someone puts virtue signalling and attention seeking over and above the club they profess to have once loved.
There are a myriad of different reasons as to why someone might stop attending matches, however his claim to not have even watched the Champions League final strikes me as being a lie to gain further attention. If anybody simply chose not to watch that match then they never really loved the club.
I don’t know anyone young or old who’s ever fell out of love with City and I suspect nobody on here genuinely has, which means this prick was never a proper blue. I even have a mate who was a season ticket holder and one eyed red who came to despise them in the 90’s and turned into a season ticket holding blue. Nobody leaves god’s own.
 
Last edited:
I used to sing "Raheem Stirling is top of the league"

Guess he won't hear it again..
I recall when we had a Bluemooners meet up in the Northern Quarter and watched England Vs Sweden. Raheem was getting a tough time in the English media. We chanted about Raheem being top of the League, every time he touched the ball, much to the surprise of most of the punters in the bar.
 
Quite apart from being a dog whistle racist and Islamophobe, Colin Shindler is a terrible writer. Awful
Many years ago I spent several weeks in hospital with a destroyed leg that required multiple surgeries
Never let anyone ever say that the Harry Kane ‘making a back’ is harmless….
My then work colleagues delivered a package of books which included his collected works
Jesus Christ. What a dullard
His book about the Summerbees was virtually unreadable, riddled with repetition and old fartery, and boring as fuck
It was a good substitute to send me to sleep when the morphine drip ran out
You are correct, my friend. He is a sinfully boring ****.
 
So I’m hoping that July 2023 will be remembered for American football club owners taking over the sports washing reputation.

Fenway Liverpool FC became a Saudi Arabia shell club. The Glazer rags were prosecuted as FFP cheats and the Lewis Spurs have uncertainty about their ownership. However, there’s not much of a murmur in our media.
 
So I’m hoping that July 2023 will be remembered for American football club owners taking over the sports washing reputation.

Fenway Liverpool FC became a Saudi Arabia shell club. The Glazer rags were prosecuted as FFP cheats and the Lewis Spurs have uncertainty about their ownership. However, there’s not much of a murmur in our media.
Not forgetting the insider trading too.

 
Here's my list of media johnnies that completely do my head in:

1 Clickbait Merchants
For goodness' sake, being a sports journalist should be one of the greatest, most fun jobs in the world. It's not about creating revenue for some behemoth of a corporation or some media mogul living on a yacht in the Mediterranean. Grow some cojones and create some meaningful, truthful football reporting or else go do some useful work to help the community, like clearing drains or emptying recycling bins..

2 Red Shirt A*se Lickers
All graduates from the school of crawling. When one of these three clubs says 'Jump' the answer isn't a questioning 'Why?' but always 'How high, sir?'. Craven lickspittles, all adherents to the view expressed to me some 15 years ago by a respected footy journalist I had correspondence with regarding his paper's false estimations of City fans anticipated behaviour ahead of the 2008 derby at Old Trafford. In his e-mail reply to my complaint, including the way the press soft-pedaled on criticism of United compared to City, he said 'If you think I or any journalist is going to take on Alex Ferguson and Man United, you've got another think coming - it would be professional suicide'. 'Lickspittles' indeed.

3 'Ethical' Herberts
The ones who stand outside the Etihad to breathlessly impart their latest 'scoop' on why City and our owners are (hint, hint..nudge, nudge) a bunch of crooks who should be given a good kicking before being thrown out of the game. A 'scoop', by the way, that always turns out to be what Private Fraser from 'Dad's Army' would describe as 'rowlocks'.. Oh and by the way (2), most of them throwing the mud have 'unusual' pasts themselves..

4 Blue Moaners
Shindler, Conn et al, who profess to have been City fans but who now disown their connections with us all, from the club ownership through the players to us supporters on the terraces. Who also refuse to accept that football has become an international game funded, yes, by immense wealth compared to yesteryear but still no different in principal from the days when Johnny Haynes became the first £100 per week (yes, that's £5200 per year..); with that principal being money begets success and is more likely to win you those trophies that will create and add to your club's 'Istry.. If you really loved the club, if it was truly in your life's blood and taken in with your mother's milk, nothing and no-one could ever break that tribal bond you claim to have had in the first place.

5 (..that's enough of lists, John.. go and have a lie down or chill out with a beer.. oh, all right then..)

The ethical herberts are the ones that do my head in. Sport is sport and should never be political. It's always been a way of escaping normal life and the history of football is full of corruption and good and bad owners and characters. The Guardian's obsession with sport being this completely fair competition based on ethics and politics is bollocks. Ultimately, almost all of their journalists just don't like City because we're stopping their teams from winning. You have idiots like Jonathan Liew claiming Haaland scoring is boring. Get out of your fucking heads guys and just enjoy the game because what you are talking about is fucking boring and there's not a person out there that isn't lining the pockets of some dodgy people indirectly just by living their lives.
 
Not forgetting the insider trading too.

But of course, this herbert at Spurs, like each and every one of us who may find ourselves in such situations, should be presumed innocent until being found guilty.

Therefore, I am sure that the media, especially here in the UK, will bear this in mind when reporting on this story, just as it has with that other, recent case involving the owner of a football club.. you know, that one with.. who is it? 'wotsisname', you know.. it's on the tip of my tongue.. the fella with the towel on his head.. lives at number 115, or is it 117? you know who I mean don't you?
 
The ethical herberts are the ones that do my head in. Sport is sport and should never be political. It's always been a way of escaping normal life and the history of football is full of corruption and good and bad owners and characters. The Guardian's obsession with sport being this completely fair competition based on ethics and politics is bollocks. Ultimately, almost all of their journalists just don't like City because we're stopping their teams from winning. You have idiots like Jonathan Liew claiming Haaland scoring is boring. Get out of your fucking heads guys and just enjoy the game because what you are talking about is fucking boring and there's not a person out there that isn't lining the pockets of some dodgy people indirectly just by living their lives.
Sportintel is just about the most condescending, pretentious and patronising turn of phrase I've ever had the misfortune of turning my eyelids up at
 
Last edited:
So I’m hoping that July 2023 will be remembered for American football club owners taking over the sports washing reputation.

Fenway Liverpool FC became a Saudi Arabia shell club. The Glazer rags were prosecuted as FFP cheats and the Lewis Spurs have uncertainty about their ownership. However, there’s not much of a murmur in our media.

Liverpool and Saudi? Have I missed something?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top