Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
Inter Me Nan said:
Jamie Carragher, the font of football knowledge. The only thing he should be giving advice on is spitting at young girls and being a scouse ****, stealing a living!
Click to expand...


FyWbJpDXsAE4WOK


c069d4037b0f4cbea31ca0da042fd50a.jpg
 
jockblue said:
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/man-city-kit-price-store-27472281

MUEN article about how United's kit is jointly most expensive in the league.
Not that you'd tell by the headline and first three quarters of the piece.


No agenda....
Click to expand...
Jock
Article penned by the literary master Chris Burns. It’s (seriously) a follow up to his impressive piece two days previously in the MUEN

‘Manchester United charging almost more than any other Premier League club for 2023/2024 kits’
 
bakerdave76 said:
On sky .
Click to expand...


This is laughable, PL only investigating because Chelsea reported themselves.
City only investigated because of stolen hacked emails lol.

PL isnt fit for purpose.

So unless you get hacked or reported yourself you are fine lol
 
Last edited:
give it to gordon said:
This is laughable, PL only investigating because Chelsea reported themselves.
City only investigated because of stolen hacked emails lol.

PL isnt fit for purpose.

So unless you get hacked or reported yourself you are fine lol
Click to expand...

I said it on another thread, it’s clearly not fit for purpose if you can only be found out bybthese means.

Imagine you could make all sorts of shit up like £50m to dig a hole with a spade etc
 
cheekybids said:
Do we know if these are minor ??
Click to expand...
Were we not told that the forced Abramovich sale wrote off £1.5bn of loans (from him)? That money may have been injected before ffp but, if it was still on the book as a liability at point of sale, surely that is very much a major influence on whether they pass the rules now..?
 
Eccles Blue said:
Wow, I've just got next week's Radio Times, the Kick Off to the new season they say. Anyway they've asked 6 pundits for their predictions:
Jamie Redknapp- can't see past Manchester City.
Michael Dawson- I don't see anyone getting close to Manchester City
Troy Deeney- Manchester City will win the league
Owen Hargreaves- Manchester City, then United will be back, Liverpool are right there and Arsenal.
Joleon Lescott- I'll say Arsenal. They've strengthened and the mental fatigue of last season's Treble could take a toll on City, even though they're still the team to beat.
Sam Matterface- Manchester City look a little light in terms of acquisitions but never bet against Pep Guardiola.

So the only one going against the trend and against us is our own Joleon!! Ok still saying we're the team to beat but ..... Joleon, Joleon, Joleon!!! ;-)
Click to expand...
Joleon shouldn’t be allowed out without his carer to do his thinking and speaking for him.

Nice fella but a dim as a tock h lamp !!
 
train man said:
Were we not told that the forced Abramovich sale wrote off £1.5bn of loans (from him)? That money may have been injected before ffp but, if it was still on the book as a liability at point of sale, surely that is very much a major influence on whether they pass the rules now..?
Click to expand...

The part of the loans that are relevant to FFP will have been considered for FFP (ignoring the inaccurate reporting thing, as we don't know what that related to).
The part that are irrelevant to FFP (age, infrastructure) don't matter at all.

There's a difference between accounts for different purposes - FFP, balance sheet, Profit&loss are all worked out on a different basis.
Having a whacking great loan outstanding does not matter to FFP.
 
train man said:
Were we not told that the forced Abramovich sale wrote off £1.5bn of loans (from him)? That money may have been injected before ffp but, if it was still on the book as a liability at point of sale, surely that is very much a major influence on whether they pass the rules now..?
Click to expand...

Tongue in cheek….that’s how they described the Rags breaches.
 
MillionMilesAway said:
The part of the loans that are relevant to FFP will have been considered for FFP (ignoring the inaccurate reporting thing, as we don't know what that related to).
The part that are irrelevant to FFP (age, infrastructure) don't matter at all.

There's a difference between accounts for different purposes - FFP, balance sheet, Profit&loss are all worked out on a different basis.
Having a whacking great loan outstanding does not matter to FFP.
Click to expand...
No, but writing it off makes it owner investment.
 
train man said:
No, but writing it off makes it owner investment.
Click to expand...

It makes no difference to FFP, which is the only aspect that cares about owner investment.
FFP views any investment in the same way - whether a loan or not.

If FFP didn't view a loan the same as investment, an owner could loan 500m now, spend 500m on the team and have it not count. That's not what happens.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top