73* and 95 is a big difference in cash though. Hopefully Palmer on loan can lower it 10m.Tolmie always uses that phrase too but the fact is we do. We can be ruthless. Kane was left swinging for one.
73* and 95 is a big difference in cash though. Hopefully Palmer on loan can lower it 10m.Tolmie always uses that phrase too but the fact is we do. We can be ruthless. Kane was left swinging for one.
Its obviously in Euros, the report.115m quid, this place is worse than twitter. Anyone saying it's 115m quid should get banned right away, haha.
Tolmie always uses that phrase too but the fact is we do. We can be ruthless. Kane was left swinging for one.
Tolmie tweeted in response to some guy that we would be willing to go as high as 85m quid + Palmer on loan. Sounds about right. I reckon this will get done by Wednesday next week.73* and 95 is a big difference in cash though. Hopefully Palmer on loan can lower it 10m.
Isn't that the problem that there is a bereft of world class players. 10 to 15 years ago you could ask football fans to pick a world 11 & there would be about 5 or 6 players who were nailed on & then the rest would depend on which team you supported or hated.West Ham won’t get that sort of money off anyone else outside Saudi. They must really want to keep him and have nobody lined up as a replacement.
Buying from another PL club is the worst VFM you can get. If City are happy with that then fair enough but you would think for that money there would be plenty of players better outside the PL.
On a second point Brighton’s hit rate is phenomenal….we need that algorithm and cut out the middle man!
It will be 95m Euro's,£80m pounds.73* and 95 is a big difference in cash though. Hopefully Palmer on loan can lower it 10m.
Is the correct answer.To those bandying about 9 digit numbers, a reminder that 110m Euros equates to £95mill. Surely £85m and Palmer on loan sees this done.
What's the co-relation between two defensive midfielders and Paqueta?The premier league market is absolutely cooked at the moment. It’s bad enough buying players in general as a PL club but transfers between PL clubs? Why not look a bit outside maybe Europe like we did for Alvarez? There are good players available like Florentino Luiz and Frederick redondo for example who would be available for a fraction of the price.
If they like Palmer surely our price for him must rise also.73* and 95 is a big difference in cash though. Hopefully Palmer on loan can lower it 10m.
Moot point but I think we only ever bid £75M.I think Kane was left hanging simply because the information his agent /brother told us was simply not reliable or true. We had no option but to walk away. We were told if we bid £100m Kane could secure a move. We were then told it was £150m which was wholly at odds with what the agent told us.
Didn't we agree personal terms with JorginhoJust have it done. If the personal terms are done they wont leave him hanging...
We were looking for a DM or proper “all-rounder” CM’s in rice and Bellingham no? So those two players fit the bill and continue the trend of the players we’re looking for. Plus Rodri is the only DM we have with Phillips seemingly not trusted.What's the co-relation between two defensive midfielders and Paqueta?
wtf? lol love itAs well as the phenomenal ball retention skills, Paqueta, like Kovacic, is highly industrious and has the energy to go hard in both directions for the full game. The harsh reality is that Gundogan and de Bruyne often looked puggled last season, particularly late in games, so their addition should see the work rate in the boiler room go even higher, something which will prove invaluable against teams such as Arsenal and Liverpool who have similarly reenergised their midfields