United Thread - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
jimharri said:

Mason Greenwood to leave Old Trafford

So to wrap things up: 1- We need him (obviously). 2- He was legally proven not guilty. 3- Made peace with his fiancee. BUT the minority mob in power wanted to cancel him, so, we should cancel him. After ronaldo, de gea and him now, I'm getting the impression that a bunch of wankers are...
www.redcafe.net www.redcafe.net



Wow!
Click to expand...
WOW indeed.
 
Wow

The rags saying he didnt do it

While we were unable to access certain evidence for reasons we respect, the evidence we did collate led us to conclude that Mason did not commit the acts he was charged with.

Why would you sack someone when you believe they didnt commit the acts he was charged with ?

What a joke of a club. So on what grounds are they sacking him if utd dont think he did anything wrong ? You cant just sack someone !
 
I just read the utd statement as saying we didn't have all the facts but had a bit more than got put in public domain, and on that basis believe MG was not guilty.
Enough to put doubt in a few peoples minds, so they can ship him out on loan to inflate his value for when they sell him in a season or two.

The Greenwood statement is a disgrace.
 
Ghandi's Flip Flops said:
I just read the utd statement as saying we didn't have all the facts but had a bit more than got put in public domain, and on that basis believe MG was not guilty.
Enough to put doubt in a few peoples minds, so they can ship him out on loan to inflate his value for when they sell him in a season or two.

The Greenwood statement is a disgrace.
Click to expand...

On the pictures she posted of what he had done to her with blood streaming down her face which got into the public domain. What evidence do they have to counter that? She had fallen down the stairs?
 
give it to gordon said:
Wow

The rags saying he didnt do it

While we were unable to access certain evidence for reasons we respect, the evidence we did collate led us to conclude that Mason did not commit the acts he was charged with.

Why would you sack someone when you believe they didnt commit the acts he was charged with ?

What a joke of a club. So on what grounds are they sacking him if utd dont think he did anything wrong ? You cant just sack someone !
Click to expand...
If he didnt commit them, why get rid
 
Corky said:
Fair play to them sacking him.
Click to expand...

I thought this at the time, but don't read the headlines mate. They haven't sacked him or released him. They are asking for a fee and offering to negotiate to a buyer. Not only that, they have openly stated that he is innocent. Satanic organisation that would make the world a better place if it was burnt down.
 
Corky said:
Fair play to them sacking him.
Click to expand...
They aren't sacking him. Both statements (club & player) are very poor, but at no point is sacking mentioned, just that he will continue his career away from the swamp. The club statement can almost appear sympathetic towards him, in that they are working with him/supporting him in his next career move (probably hoping they can get a transfer fee out of it).

United said in a statement: "All those involved, including Mason, recognise the difficulties with him recommencing his career at Manchester United.

"It has therefore been mutually agreed that it would be most appropriate for him to do so away from Old Trafford, and we will now work with Mason to achieve that outcome."
 
The united view on this is he is innocent then cut ties with him, Charges against the 21-year-old England international, including attempted rape and assault were dropped, That statement is wrong because the CPS did not drop the case, it was because the Greenwoods and her father got her to change her statement to let greenwood play football and earn millions,

Sorry, he is not innocent by any means and the video and pictures make him guilty in the public eye. Nobody is buying into his innocent claims because the case was dropped, We know what went on and the truth is he should also have been charged with intimidation of the witness when she changed her statement,
 
CarlosTevez'sEnglishTutor said:
I thought this at the time, but don't read the headlines mate. They haven't sacked him or released him. They are asking for a fee and offering to negotiate to a buyer. Not only that, they have openly stated that he is innocent. Satanic organisation that would make the world a better place if it was burnt down.
Click to expand...

Oh I didnt read that about selling him I thought he was sacked !
 
youngbob said:
Big hand to Adam Crafton on this. His reporting has exposed United's dirty tactics and arguably turned the tide.
Click to expand...
Plus whichever person / employee at United that had the sense or moral fibre to appreciate they were taking the wrong path by setting the scene to eventually keep him.
 
So is he a free agent or are they going to profit from the sale of this abuser?

**Sky saying still under contract, so they will try to profit from a sale….
 
Last edited:
bluetonium said:
He'll have to go abroad. He's probably thinking a few years in Italy or somewhere and then he'll pop back into the England squad, if so I'd wager he'd be underestimating the strength of feeling towards him in England.

Would be a brave or stupid team to take him on now. Innocent until proven guilty sure, but I think we can firmly put this in the OJ camp of alleged crimes. I'll not await his self promoting book about how if would have done it, hypothetically, if it was him.

Also means that Rachel Riley can continue supporting the rags in her Giggs duvet and Rio PJ's. What could be more wholesome, her unwavering support can continue because whilst Greenwood was a step too far, the rest of the gang are ok because,...why exactly it that again Rachel? Of course, that famous Man United History!

Whether it's selling rotten meat to school children, paying celebrities to appear in a charity match out of the actual raised charity funds, cheating on your dying wife, sucking your own daughter's toes, assaulting your other half,, claiming special pant crapping dispensation to get off with a driving ban, all allegedly of course, Man United surely are the club to support, if you're as morally questionable as their actual staff that is.
Click to expand...
Surely not her Giggsy duvet. I doubt he’s signed up to the stop gender based violence campaign.
 
I tell you what I’ve learnt over the last few days, too many blokes, particularly outside of the UK but a fair few in it considered it a matter between a bloke & his missus. Over the years & without the evidence I’ve been guilty of under-estimating what cunts blokes have been towards women but that audio was a fucking tough listen & yet people excuse it.

I hope one day the young lady breaks free from this horrible ****, he’s not worthy of her affection.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top