Liverpool Thread - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
Whether or not said:
They have now publicly said it wasn’t checked because the VAR thought it had been given as a goal on the pitch. So they consciously didn’t check a marginal Liverpool goal because they thought it had been allowed. There is a conspiracy alright, but not the one the scousers are implying.
Click to expand...
This to the power of a thousand. Despite the endless comment, this was a tight call. And we know from experience that players who look onside are very often off, and vice versa. We still haven’t seen both the horizontal lines and the vertical lines drawn from the furthest forward point of Diaz’s body. So we still have no conclusive evidence that the goal was onside.

It has been pointed out many times on this forum that tight Liverpool calls are not being checked. Clear evidence that this is the case.
 
mattcity5 said:
Are you able to go for the ball and somehow only connect with the top of it, bouncing off the ball into someone's leg, while being in control of the challenge?

I'd say it all adds up to not being in control. And when you see the bend of the defender's leg, it suggests there's enough force to cause serious damage.

I dont think it was deliberate, but it doesn't have to be any more. Remember when Kompany got sent off for his foul on Rooney when he didn't even make any contact??
Click to expand...
It was Nani he didn't make any contact with and the Granny Shagger went bleating to the ref to send him off which he duly did.
 
This will run and run because quite simply the next time liverpool get a contentious decision go for them, the other team that is affected is going to turn around and say this was only given because you are trying to placate liverpool and you are favouring them because of their tantrum and they will be absolutely within their rights to do so
 
Ballymagash Blue said:
This to the power of a thousand. Despite the endless comment, this was a tight call. And we know from experience that players who look onside are very often off, and vice versa. We still haven’t seen both the horizontal lines and the vertical lines drawn from the furthest forward point of Diaz’s body. So we still have no conclusive evidence that the goal was onside.

It has been pointed out many times on this forum that tight Liverpool calls are not being checked. Clear evidence that this is the case.
Click to expand...
Wow, that could be interesting.

So Liverpool, by complaining about the incompetence of miscommunication have unknowingly revealed that they are treated differently because tight decisions in their favour are not ‘checked from all angles’, they are just waved through.

And the incident would have been completely unreported if the VAR room had ‘correctly’ communicated their decision, (causing the goal to stand), burying the actual real corruption story that they didn’t review it at all.

As I’ve mentioned already, if this Liverpool complaint leads to release of VAR/ref audio and video to ALL, then it would be quite sweet if the corrupt bias is swept away by Liverpool’s own actions.

I await the media picking up these actual nuances and running with them… just like I await the heat death of the universe.
 
I was searching yesterday for the Sky Sports ref watch that would have discussed this. Cannot find it - anyone know if it happened?

I have just re-watched the episode that covered the shite decision at the swamp last year - Gallagher was squirming trying not to criticise Attwell
 
Tim Vickery on 5Live world football phone in revealed all the hate tweets and threats he received from Liverpool fans after tweeting about the goal.

He doubled down on his opinion calling some Liverpool fans "underdeveloped."

He half jokingly said the delay in the release in VAR audio Is to allow Darren England to leave the country before the Liverpool fans find him.
 
Ballymagash Blue said:
This to the power of a thousand. Despite the endless comment, this was a tight call. And we know from experience that players who look onside are very often off, and vice versa. We still haven’t seen both the horizontal lines and the vertical lines drawn from the furthest forward point of Diaz’s body. So we still have no conclusive evidence that the goal was onside.

It has been pointed out many times on this forum that tight Liverpool calls are not being checked. Clear evidence that this is the case.
Click to expand...
Was it the same end of the ground Wolves were denied a goal because VAR couldn't determine whether or not Nunes was offside?

If that is the case then it points to the fact that their ground has a known issue with VAR, and that teams are getting screwed over as a result.

Anfield is not and never has been a level playing field, but when you add shonky VAR into the mix, even more so.

Hornets nest anyone?
 
I said yesterday that i genuinely think their hubris could hurt them way more than help them, everyone knows that even 60-40 calls go in their favour and its an open joke that you dont get those decisions at anfield, if they are advocating for games to be actually fairly reffed then they are going to get way less decisions than they had before.
 
Oldham Exile said:
I was searching yesterday for the Sky Sports ref watch that would have discussed this. Cannot find it - anyone know if it happened?

I have just re-watched the episode that covered the shite decision at the swamp last year - Gallagher was squirming trying not to criticise Attwell
Click to expand...
The ref watch covering this weekends games?

It was an extended episode yesterday. 45 mins instead of the usual 30

Spent at least 35 mins on Liverpool then brushed over all the other incidents this weekend

Regarding the Korean guys second yellow, Gallagher just said the ref was 7 yards away so had the best view.. correct decision... then they moved on
 
chaddblue said:
The ref watch covering this weekends games?

It was an extended episode yesterday. 45 mins instead of the usual 30

Spent at least 35 mins on Liverpool then brushed over all the other incidents this weekend

Regarding the Korean guys second yellow, Gallagher just said the ref was 7 yards away so had the best view.. correct decision... then they moved on
Click to expand...
A wolves fan I know who was at the game said they all winced in the stand because they expected him to be sent off which would have changed the game in our favour.
 
chaddblue said:
The ref watch covering this weekends games?

It was an extended episode yesterday. 45 mins instead of the usual 30

Spent at least 35 mins on Liverpool then brushed over all the other incidents this weekend

Regarding the Korean guys second yellow, Gallagher just said the ref was 7 yards away so had the best view.. correct decision... then they moved on
Click to expand...
Yes - that would be the one thanks.

Probably just my poor searching skills. Now that I know it happened I can go and look again
 
Its getting like the JFK conspiracy.
Howard Webb joined the South Yorkshire Police in 1992. His work colleagues throughout the 90’s were gobshites like Sykes, Middup, Duckenfield, McKay, Burman, Bettison etc etc

And yet we’re mad to suggest the chief of English referring may have a slight anti-Liverpool leaning [emoji849]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top