Middle East Conflict

Are we all going to negotiate parts out of the Koran that call for the eradication of the Jews, or the other things that go along with it ?

Best of luck with that, because as already stated it is apparently the immutable word of god !

Best we can hope for is some form of truce that will not be legally binding on Islam (another thing stated in their scripture) until they find themselves powerful enough to break treaty.
It’s funny that Jews and Muslims have lived together throughout the world without killing each other, there are still some small communities left, but you are taking this to extremes, this is not a war against Islam, and your are kind of turning it that way.

And it’s strange how some far right groups in this country have latched on to this war and the brutality, back in the day it was the Jews who were the target for their hate, and all the same arguments were trotted out about the Jews and Judaism as are being trotted out about Islam and Muslims, they just need a minority group who they can’t understand or never try to understand

I hope you are not one those people, it’s a deep rabbit hole to fall into
 
Yeah, I get your point.
What about flooding tunnels, wouldn't that be a threat? No idea how realistic that is at all. Just a thought how to minimize own losses in tunnels.
I know, where does the water come from.
I'm no expert here but due to its geographical location I'm guessing the water table is low. There's the sea along the coast but you'd need a lot of pumps and pipes and it would only be effective for a very limited distance and then only in something like a small bunker/tunnel complex. It probably isnt feasible. There's a good book on tunnel warfare called the tunnels of Cu Chi . The Americans couldn't eradicate them even with B52 bombers. They had fully equipped hospitals and even cinemas in them. One of the things that that the Viet Cong did was to dig the entrances and initial access tunnels so small that the average American couldn't fit through. The Vietnamese being of smaller physical build could crawl through with ease.
 
What is the negotiated way to end it? I agree a negotiation is necessary but that comes after both parties have agreed to stop killing each other. I'm more talking about getting to the latter. Israel could negotiate with people like Arafat many years ago but this is different.

Israel has no sensible and calm leadership to negotiate with, they're all in Qatar waging war and sunning it a million miles from the war they have started.

You have to remember that Hamas currently hold hundreds of hostages. Many posters on here conveniently forget that when they call for restraint and in the same breath almost justify shite such as armed struggle in desperation.

Taking hostages for a political cause pretty much fulfils the definition of terrorism so should a country negotiate with terrorists?

Countries always negotiate with terrorists if they see it is in their interests to do so. We did with the IRA. They even became the part of the official Govt.

Right now, Israel via the US and others will be negotiating with Hamas to free the hostages.
 
Are we all going to negotiate parts out of the Koran that call for the eradication of the Jews, or the other things that go along with it ?

Best of luck with that, because as already stated it is apparently the immutable word of god !

Best we can hope for is some form of truce that will not be legally binding on Islam (another thing stated in their scripture) until they find themselves powerful enough to break treaty.
The Quran doesn't call for the eradication of Jews though.

It does call them killers of the prophets (JtB and JC) and that they shunned the phophet so will be scattered from the holy land and given no land of their own.


Many mistake Sura 9 which calls to take the sword to non believers as a call to kill any non muslim,
but the same Sura also calls for those of the book (any follower on non muslim abrahamic religions) to be allowed to live peacefully with reduced status until they see the prophets word.

The sultinates and Ottomans followed the latter hence why Jews, Muslims and Christians lived in relative peace for centuries with jews and christian subject to heavier taxes and some limitations on ownership of businesses.

Unfortunately post otterman Cunts like those who follow Wahhabism, Qutbism and terrorist like Hamas and Boko Haram, only reqd the first part and use it to justify being evil bastards

As with every religous text, people will interpretate it to suit their agenda and care little for those they make suffer.

Hamas are cunts doing just that.
 
Last edited:
Just having a thought having chickened out of work after yesterday’s gallon of stout. I know / have known lots of Muslim people. I have never known one to utter a negative word about Jewish people. Apart from one Zionist at College 30 odd years ago. I’ve never come across a Jewish person say a bad word about Muslim or Arab people. Isn’t Britain a wonderful place. (I’m talking in person and not on the news or social media). Maybe I just live a sheltered existence.

I know Jewish people too. Purely by chance I celebrated Erling’s record breaking goal against West Ham with Howard Bernstein. There’s plenty of people I know who could be Jewish and I’m not aware of it. I’m not interested in religion.

My supporters club branch has a zero tolerance to bringing up religion, say on the coach to games. It doesn’t have to be enforced because nobody brings up religion. Our policy stems from being formed on a US military base where discussion about religion wasn’t accepted for common sense reasons. The world is a much better place when people get on.

Boring but true!
 
Hamas is Isis
I think and hope no one on here will argue that hamas are diabolical - I have not seen a single post on here argue they are anything but that. Just in case you are misinterpreting anybodys condemnation of the barbaric war crimes - such as cutting off the populations water supply - that the Israel regime are committing in Gaza, with that
 
Last edited:
It’s funny that Jews and Muslims have lived together throughout the world without killing each other, there are still some small communities left, but you are taking this to extremes, this is not a war against Islam, and your are kind of turning it that way.
It's actually funny that you are saying that, were you the one who posted about the fine relations and 'golden age' of Jews in the Ottaman empire ?

You do realise that the status quo was maintained by any minority (not just Jews) accepted that they were of lower social, and legal status than a muslim (dhimmi), and that they paid tribute/tax (jizya) to their masters ?

It is not a war against Islam, as you seem to claim, but it is a war against the Jews !
 
The reality is that Israel became a formally recognised country by the decleration of the UN. You can argue about the rights, wrongs and wherefores of that all you want, but that remains a fact.
Not aware that I said otherwise or made any arguements about rights, wrongs and wherefores.
 
Not long off going global..back to aldi to replenish the cider. Might need something stronger
 
So they've spouted plenty about the state of Palestine and Illegal Israel settlements. But they've spoken the truth about the Israel's right to exist.

A bit like everything i say is the truth when its in your favour but its spouting when its not in your favour.

The right of a state to exist isn't a concept in international law.

The right of self-determination is what exists in international law.
 
It’s funny that Jews and Muslims have lived together throughout the world without killing each other, there are still some small communities left, but you are taking this to extremes, this is not a war against Islam, and your are kind of turning it that way.

And it’s strange how some far right groups in this country have latched on to this war and the brutality, back in the day it was the Jews who were the target for their hate, and all the same arguments were trotted out about the Jews and Judaism as are being trotted out about Islam and Muslims, they just need a minority group who they can’t understand or never try to understand

I hope you are not one those people, it’s a deep rabbit hole to fall into

It’s nothing to do with being right wing and everything to do with being of a position that says terrorists and death cults like Hamas, ISIS etc have no place in this world.

To try and suggest holding that opinion makes you right wing or disappearing down some rabbit hole is rubbish but sadly, par for the course on here at least.

Thankfully off here and away from social media, a majority agree.
 
So they've spouted plenty about the state of Palestine and Illegal Israel settlements. But they've spoken the truth about the Israel's right to exist.

A bit like everything i say is the truth when its in your favour but its spouting when its not in your favour.
No, if you checked you may find that the UN has changed more than a little over the years. In 1948 there were 58 members. The OIC have 57 members, of which 56 are UN members.

Now there are over 190 members, and groups formed within that that 'promote' special interests. We now have some of the larger human rights abusers sat on the boards that deal with human rights for instance.
 
It's not walking back anything. Jewish settlers formed terrorist groups and carried out a campaign of violence, which included targeting civilians.

The British withdrew in response to the chaos.

Why do you ignore the UN's declaration that Israeli settlements are illegal?
Mr. Kobayashi, I have read your comments and agree with you!! So please do not take these points as a criticism !! I have clearly stated before, that other than the recent Hamas attack, I have taken a Pro Palestinian approach to this conflict. The danger comes when people start making comments that without proper research could be flawed.Much like us being led on with chat of WMD in Iraq. Now I stand to be corrected, and any comments are welcome. I have taken time to listen to the Israeli side of this matter and perhaps was a little surprised.

1. Illegal Israeli settlements. I feel that many people refer to UN Resolutions which are not legally binding.
2.Only the UN Security Council can create a final lawful situation. This has not yet happened.
3. I suspect when people discuss illegality, they may also be referring to Charter 49 of the Geneva Convention of which indeed the Israelis are in breach. But this does assume an illegal occupation.
4.In 1922 the League of Nations Council agreed that Palestine in total was to become the home of the Israelis but under a British Mandate. It did also say however that the rights of Palestinians were to be observed.Israelis argue that this in fact is the only binding agreement. But one can also argue that they failed to protect the rights of the Palestinians.
5.It does not help that the USA and Britain quite often abstain from UN votes on these matters.

Finally..I urge anyone who has Netflix to watch BORN IN GAZA..this documentary pre-dates this current crisis. In truth Gaza is a hell hole and the Palestinians have been treated abysmally.I could barely watch it,shocking footage.
 
No, if you checked you may find that the UN has changed more than a little over the years. In 1948 there were 58 members. The OIC have 57 members, of which 56 are UN members.

Now there are over 190 members, and groups formed within that that 'promote' special interests. We now have some of the larger human rights abusers sat on the boards that deal with human rights for instance.
Human rights ? Do they only exist for certain communities ? Do Palestinians have human rights?
Should a western country decide what human rights people of Middle Eastern countries have?
If west is adamant to have a standard charter of human rights, then why that is not applied to the rights of people of Palestine or Iraq or Afghanistan or Syria or Libya and so on … ?

Or do they only care about the human rights of people who identify themselves with the western values ? In essence they defend the western values rather than rights of humans who happen to identify themselves with the western values. If the same people changed their mind on the western values, would the west still talk about their rights? No, they’ll say they deserve to suffer because they have such backward (in west’s view) values.
 
It's also a state created by Terrorism.

And a state that decided to help the terrorists it now fights in order to divide and rule and prolong the limbo of the Palestinians.
Ridiculous, moronic and totally ignorant statement albeit typical of some, fortunately a minority, on here who love to spout cliches about this situation.

Israel is a democratic state, founded democratically by a vote at the UN. It's amusing how those who decry Israel for not accepting UN resolutions, refuse to accept the most crucial one in the history of the region and also fail to recognise that the actions of the Arab bloc had consequences. As actions do.

Had the Arab side accepted partition, things may have turned out differently. But they didn't, and that led to them (a) attacking Israel en masse, (b) losing quite a bit of the territory assigned to them in the Partition Plan and (c) creating a lot of refugees among the Palestinian people in the former Mandate. No war, no refugees.

After 1948, Gaza was under military occupation, but by Egypt, not Israel, and the West Bank was annexed, not by Israeli settlers but by Jordan. But the people screaming about Israel "occupying" Gaza and creeping annexation of the West Bank didn't seem to get too incensed about that. And if the 1948 war had turned out differentl, with a total Arab victory, then the territory would have been claimed by Syria, as part of its fantasy 'Greater Syria', which included most of that part of the world and even parts of the Arabian Peninsula.

Nasser rattled his sabres in 1967 and closed the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping and forcing the removal of the UN peacekeeping force in Sinai, despite Israel making it clear that these would be a causus belli. Yet he still went ahead and did that, leading to the Six Day War. That left Israel in control of Gaza and the West Bank, leading to the current situation. Actions, yet again, having consequences.

Then there was the rise of Palestinian terrorism, leading to the Munich Olympic massacre in 1972 and other notorious events. Followed by the 1973 Yom Kippur War, when Israel was attacked without provocation.

That's not to excuse the actions of the more recent Israeli governments, fuelled by the rise of the right-wing settler movement and the governments that have enabled and encouraged that. And of course those actions have had consequences as well.

And the notion that Hamas are somehow noble freedom fighters is completely simplistic and utterly wrong. Hamas clearly don't care one bit for their fellow Palestinian. In fact, as we're seeing now, they see hem as collateral damage in a wider ideological struggle financed and fuelled by the religious fanatics in Iran (who aren't even Arabs). The more innocents who die, the more they run their hands in glee and capitalise on it via their propagenda.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top