Managinf to shift the blame of tory policy onto the lib Dems and washing your hands of any accountability (despite accountability being one of the loudest arguments used for conservativism) was incredibly statesman like.What was it he did as PM between 2010 and 2015 that led you to think he was pretty competent and statesman-like?
Reality is that the way the government have acted, they’ve got nothing left to give and what we’re seeing is basically a closedown of anything good for this country.Yeah, but sadly the business of government is being ignored while they factionalise and backbite and bad mouth each other.
I think we deserve better and we must never forget this debacle of a party and an administration.
Reality is that the way the government have acted, they’ve got nothing left to give and what we’re seeing is basically a closedown of anything good for this country.
We can now see the disaster that is with us, now we have to expect further stuff that will take us deeper into the mire.
Basically, enjoy your shitshow, we’re all in this together.
Is Cameron up to something and playing the long game here? With all the money he has being foreign secretary for a year won’t enhance his bank balance, all this crap about wanting to serve the country again doesn’t wash if you look at what he did to lead us towards the disaster which was brexit.
The Tories will be wiped out by January 2025, they will have two choices. Keep going down the racist gammon little England pathway under the stewardship of Sue Ellen as leader. Then there’s the other way of returning back to broadchurch Conservatism which Cameron managed to wrestle away the keys to number ten from New Labour. Cameron isn’t doing this to help out poor Rishi, he wants something which is having his political party back.
The tories are already planning on post election wipeout reform. The two wings of the party are drifting apart and Cameron coming back is part of that power struggle. Its the moderate wing trying to beef up the appeal to moderate voters.It’s not ridiculous to think he fancies another go at leader in 2025.
In many ways I’m fine with that.
Starmer vs Cameron would be a refreshing return to sensible politics.
The problem for them is the grassroots of the party has been taken over by UKIP, you won’t get selected to stand unless you are very right wing, unless someone gets a grip they are going to destroy themselves, it’s lovely to watchThe tories are already planning on post election wipeout reform. The two wings of the party are drifting apart and Cameron coming back is part of that power struggle. Its the moderate wing trying to beef up the appeal to moderate voters.
The shape of the party post election will depend on who survives the cull. All seats are now in play and the next leader has to win their seat first and hope enough of their supporters also win.
Think the Macmillan government is generally considered to have been a good one for the majority of people.Please let us know a period of Tory rule which hasn't resulted in a shit show for the rest of us
True but its a very undemocratic model. All the power is in the head office. When it comes to leader it only goes to members if the MPs can't decide themselves. Its lining up for a full on civil war as the members and tory press are full loony. Given half the chance they would have Boris back, or Liz.The problem for them is the grassroots of the party has been taken over by UKIP, you won’t get selected to stand unless you are very right wing, unless someone gets a grip they are going to destroy themselves, it’s lovely to watch
It’s not ridiculous to think he fancies another go at leader in 2025.
In many ways I’m fine with that.
Starmer vs Cameron would be a refreshing return to sensible politics.
The tories are already planning on post election wipeout reform. The two wings of the party are drifting apart and Cameron coming back is part of that power struggle. Its the moderate wing trying to beef up the appeal to moderate voters.
The shape of the party post election will depend on who survives the cull. All seats are now in play and the next leader has to win their seat first and hope enough of their supporters also win.
I think it is.
To be PM, Cameron would now need to resign his peerage before somehow getting elected.
Can't see that happening.
I suspect the same thing. He's got the gravitas to be elected leader again and I could see him taking a safe Tory seat "For the sake of democracy", or some other PR bollocks.Is Cameron up to something and playing the long game here? With all the money he has being foreign secretary for a year won’t enhance his bank balance, all this crap about wanting to serve the country again doesn’t wash if you look at what he did to lead us towards the disaster which was brexit.
The Tories will be wiped out by January 2025, they will have two choices. Keep going down the racist gammon little England pathway under the stewardship of Sue Ellen as leader. Then there’s the other way of returning back to broadchurch Conservatism which Cameron managed to wrestle away the keys to number ten from New Labour. Cameron isn’t doing this to help out poor Rishi, he wants something which is having his political party back.
He'd happily resign it when his accounts are due to be made public for the role.I think it is.
To be PM, Cameron would now need to resign his peerage before somehow getting elected.
Can't see that happening.
He could be PM from the House of Lords, Marquess of Salisbury was the last person to do it 1902. Lord Home did it but then renounced his peerage. The arrangement that he has now that allows him to be Foreign Secretary probably means he could be PM and not sit in the commons. Remember this is the Conservative Party who illegally shut down Parliament, they don’t care about rules and laws to get what they want.
He'd happily resign it when his accounts are due to be made public for the role.
It’s unlikely, the party is so fractured and grassroots are now rabid right wing, who hate himHe could be PM from the House of Lords, Marquess of Salisbury was the last person to do it 1902. Lord Home did it but then renounced his peerage. The arrangement that he has now that allows him to be Foreign Secretary probably means he could be PM and not sit in the commons. Remember this is the Conservative Party who illegally shut down Parliament, they don’t care about rules and laws to get what they want.
I know it has happened a long time ago - the electoral system has changed somewhat since then.
I don't think it's tenable nowadays.
Douglas-Home is a rather more relevant precedent, resigning a peerage to become an MP.