inchy14
Well-Known Member
At his time incarcerated?He wasn't a terrorist.
At his time incarcerated?He wasn't a terrorist.
Ok, what are you implying?
Well what did you mean by your post then?I don't believe I implied anything, it was a statement that I believe to be true.
At his time incarcerated?
Well what did you mean by your post then?
I guess the starting point is the pre 67 borders minus the Golan HeightsExcept we have nothing on the table, only an empty phrase.
Or did I miss the details?
Yes! He wasn'tAt his time incarcerated?
Yes! He wasn't
IDF using White Phosphorous now.
Been doing that a lotIDF using White Phosphorous now.
The South African government, which is the relevant government here, didn't designate him a terrorist. And the U.S. designation was a function of the support the ANC began to receive from the Soviet Union in their fight for freedom. A cold war designation
You know Israel could never go back to that for their security issues.I guess the starting point is the pre 67 borders minus the Golan Heights
I didn't check the story, but I know it is false. Common sense suggests Israel will not use white phosphorous. Not because they are good guys. But because they are not stupid!IDF using White Phosphorous now.
Of course compromises will have to be made on all sides, that’s what a negotiation is all aboutYou know Israel could never go back to that for their security issues.
Jerusalem would be unsolved.
Gaza and West banks were unconnected.
We have no whatsoever idea of a 2-state solution.
We need a new idea.
I didn't check the story, but I know it is false. Common sense suggests Israel will not use white phosphorous. Not because they are good guys. But because they are not stupid!
Perhaps AIPAC should pivot and work on this issue and bingo, full house. It's interesting that the U.S. backs Israel to the nth degree when it comes to her borders, but what is the U.S. doing to secure their own? Physician, heal thyself.I see the money has still not arrived, I suspect that this is part of the US carrot and stick approach
hit a brick wall over border security
The South African government, which is the relevant government here, didn't designate him a terrorist. And the U.S. designation was a function of the support the ANC began to receive from the Soviet Union in their fight for freedom. A cold war designation
Violence against civilians in the pursuit of political aims was not an offense or crime Mandela was convicted of. So, no, he was not a terrorist.
At his time incarcerated?
Someone said that all terrorists should be executed so I asked did that include Mandela.. then this debate just went on and on.Nelson Mandela was undoubtedly classed as a terrorist when he was a leader in the ANC, which was categorised as a terrorist organisation by the South African government as well as the US and UK government.
leaders in officially designated terrorist groups are called...terrorists.
He wasn't convicted of terror offences, but from what I read no one said he was. There are plenty of Hamas leaders in Qatar who are definitely terrorists and haven't been convicted of being a terrorist.
Now Emmeline Pankhurst? She was both a terrorist and convicted for carrying out a terrorist attack.
What was the point of all this anyway?