halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 14,886
The problem is they had to vote for FFP or they wouldn't have been allowed to compete.
Naah, they could have voted against it, but once it was voted in, they had to comply with it.
The problem is they had to vote for FFP or they wouldn't have been allowed to compete.
I’m missed their inability to say bootiful properly too.Family tree...mainly trunk.
Same here. But would you put it past them to bring in new rules to stop coming back? I certainly wouldn’t!I trust our club even if we were relegated which is highly unlikely we would win promotion the next season and conquer the premier league again.
Highly unlikely.I believe ‘The other big 6 teams have funded the PL’s case against City’
The rest is horse shit.
It’s only fair as well to acknowledge the charges for failing to cooperate, which being more black and white than subjective the club is likely to end up found in breach and incurring at least some sort of punishment which technically could itself be points deducted but of course would most likely be a chunky fine, which City’s executives would have your arm off now for as an end result.
I believe Rishi Sunak recently announced that the independent regulator is due very soon. Would this bring about a re-examination of the facts of our case?
And don't forget Reading, who abstained and cost the vote!!
Penny for their thoughts now, eh?
So with Everton they detailed the exact amount failed by to justify punishment. With the United ffp failure they mentioned no figures and something about a small loss! Talk about fudging it!
It’s only fair as well to acknowledge the charges for failing to cooperate, which being more black and white than subjective the club is likely to end up found in breach and incurring at least some sort of punishment which technically could itself be points deducted but of course would most likely be a chunky fine, which City’s executives would have your arm off now for as an end result.
Any points deduction would mean Pep walks
you know you can use a wallet like everyone elseI would bet my bottom dollar they have not lied to Pep.
I agree entirely it is harsh, I was simply highlighting that it has no relevance to the City case. But obviously your biased media have no interest in that factual view of things.In football terms is it well in excess tho?? If they’d finished a few places higher in a couple of those 3 seasons. They’d have likely passed due to the increase in prize money….
It seems an excessive punishment when such small differing outcomes of a game or two would see them in the clear
Having said all that they did vote for it…. ;)
View attachment 98974
He knows himself only too well.
Their stupidity and ignorance has proved to be very costly.