PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I trust our club even if we were relegated which is highly unlikely we would win promotion the next season and conquer the premier league again.
Same here. But would you put it past them to bring in new rules to stop coming back? I certainly wouldn’t!
 
It’s only fair as well to acknowledge the charges for failing to cooperate, which being more black and white than subjective the club is likely to end up found in breach and incurring at least some sort of punishment which technically could itself be points deducted but of course would most likely be a chunky fine, which City’s executives would have your arm off now for as an end result.
 
I believe Rishi Sunak recently announced that the independent regulator is due very soon. Would this bring about a re-examination of the facts of our case?

Are the pl just trying to screw any club that threatens the cartel before the independent regulator is appointed ?
 
It’s only fair as well to acknowledge the charges for failing to cooperate, which being more black and white than subjective the club is likely to end up found in breach and incurring at least some sort of punishment which technically could itself be points deducted but of course would most likely be a chunky fine, which City’s executives would have your arm off now for as an end result.

Failing to cooperate is also something that has to be proved though. Both parties may have different expectations on cooperation.

The Premier League may have asked information that City felt was private and none of their business. Again the burden of proof is with the Premier League on that one too.

30 of the charges are in relation to cooperation. I imagine a breach of cooperation is merely a fine anyway.
 
Everton potentially liable for £300m to other clubs. Chelsea and City with the potential to go to the wall. FFP doing a great job. Imagine clubs (City included) signing up to rules that gives a tin-pot commission the power to effectively put a £5bn company out of business, seemingly without any real avenue for appeal. Blows my mind.
 
In football terms is it well in excess tho?? If they’d finished a few places higher in a couple of those 3 seasons. They’d have likely passed due to the increase in prize money….

It seems an excessive punishment when such small differing outcomes of a game or two would see them in the clear

Having said all that they did vote for it…. ;)
I agree entirely it is harsh, I was simply highlighting that it has no relevance to the City case. But obviously your biased media have no interest in that factual view of things.
 
it does surprise me that if these numbers are true Everton lost overall 124m while the upper limit was 105m over 3 years.
to get a 10p deduction for that is quite harsh imo. what if they are 70m above the limit instead of 20m? 35points deduction?

Wolves failed Uefa FFP I think 2 times overall, how comes they never had any investigation.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top