Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
eyalluvitt said:
Today the media finally dropped the two week narrative that Chelsea are the greatest team ever in the issstree of football and replaced them with liVARpool briefly until they binned them off for Arteta’s champions elect, exhausting keeping up
Click to expand...
I'm out of breath with it all.. and at my age, I need all the breaths I can get..!
 
Mad Eyed Screamer said:
BBC being sneaky as per.....
A couple of paragraphs about Everton and then laying into the UAE and human rights
www.bbc.co.uk

Manchester City v Liverpool: Everton points-protest banner one of two flown over Etihad

A banner protesting at Everton's 10-point penalty was flown over Manchester City's Etihad Stadium on Saturday.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
Click to expand...

We should organise one for the next home game saying "FUCK THE BBC" and see if they spend 300 words explaining the background.

What is all that shit doing on a football page? People protest in the ground, they turn the sound down; people protest on the pitch, they turn the cameras away immediately. Fly a banner and you get a whole article.

Cunts.
 
Bald fraud said:
Ah well at least it stops the cole palmer wankathon!
Click to expand...
Indeed, I was thinking we had a new Maradona in our midst. In reality the match in question there were four wingers on the pitch and he was third or fourth best. Sterling and Foden were considerably better, and Doku possibly had his quietest game. I like your use of words too.
 
It happens every week. Those who control the narrative during or just after the game, on commentary, set the headline for the week and it is inevitably Neville and/or Carragher. 'Soft' penalty one week bought the card the next and the papers run with it for the week until the next game. Whether the scribblers and hacks have been doing the job too long and can't be arsed to come up with their own views (or write about what they saw), or whether they ever had that ability in the first place, is unclear.

And so we have this weeks gem. Ratboy reckons TAA is the new or better than KDB.

It's difficult to know where to start with this one. I understand, in truth, that there is very little for Liverpool to take away from this one, but lets look at the facts. Doku tore him a new one and he needed 2 or 3 covering him. Another 12 months under his belt and Doku would have tracked him back - Jack would have. TAA is an ok footballer but they couldn't find a position for him as he isn't a fullback, so the team has to suffer. He has been playing this 'hybrid' role for 5 mins and will get found out - meanwhile Kev has been the best creative midfielder for some years. To make the comparison is as insulting as it is ridiculous. He didn't have to think too long to come up with a motm - Bernie ran the game with some exquisite touches and intelligent play and was better defensively.

One thing is clear his dislike of us goes way above of his dislike of Liverpool.
 
Fuzzy80 said:
Surely that’s hiding owner investment not sponsorship
Click to expand...
Like I said kind of- disguising owner investment by injecting cash into the club via sponsorship relates to hiding sponsorship deals.
Your splitting hairs over a few words, given all of stuff that's published that's factually incorrect I'm struggling to be outraged about it TBH.
 
City draw against 2nd place Liverpool, Arsenal score a last minute goal against a hard working Brentford side.

Media = "City blow it; Arsenal now favourites for title!"

spongebob-how-many-times-do-we-need-to-teach-you.gif
 
I see Martin Samuel is going the way of the other hacks. Didn’t take him long after taking Murdoch’s shilling.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top