Blue and true
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Feb 2015
- Messages
- 4,509
They should have a duty to appoint the best football experts in the business, but they don't. That's the shit reality. Ironically, they appoint those who are going to aggravate the masses and get them talking, because it's all about "engagement" for them in the 21st Century. Before women were introduced to their current roles it was dominated by men and the vast majority of them were thick as pig shit and didn't know their arse from their elbow. The Sky Sports panel were no better than some modern female counterparts. Paul Merson is a classic example. He's awful but I just don't listen to him; I can still enjoy the game. Crap punditry is inconsequential if I can still watch Haaland bang in a hattrick live.I think this Joey Barton character is an absolute degenerate clown who lacks any intellect to communicate his points but people pay their hard-earned money to these TV channels and streaming services to receive the top end analysis of the game, it's all part of the fan experience, it's not just about watching the game but receiving a package. These TV companies have a duty to appoint the best knowledge football experts in the business.
And you're right, Barton is a degenerate and its unsurprising he of all people started this.
Quick edit: if they were going to appoint the best experts they'd appoint journalists; at the very least they're erudite and can engage in cogent arguments. But they don't.