its a Barm
Well-Known Member
What worries me is they will not want us to walk away Scott free of all charges it will make them look fools they will want something to appease the red shirted masses.
bollocks, beat me to it!Dineage should surely be asking the questions just like her Dad used to do:
“How”
One for the FOC’s.
Ah, so this is it.The rule requiring annual accounts that show a true and fair view goes back way before 2009, so the alleged breach of not providing such accounts is valid even if FFP didn't yet exist.
I imagine, though, a defence will be, what was the point?
Yep,they’ll have to get something to stick regardless of the truth.What worries me is they will not want us to walk away Scott free of all charges it will make them look fools they will want something to appease the red shirted masses.
Let's ask Jack Hargreaves.HOW! is she allowed to make such statements??
They’re not going to appease the red shirt masses. We will either be found guilty of something and punished accordingly, or our lawyers will do their job and throw it all out, with us being cleared of everything.What worries me is they will not want us to walk away Scott free of all charges it will make them look fools they will want something to appease the red shirted masses.
I don't think it is the only animating force, but one of them is no doubt that rival fans wanted to scupper Pep's (possible) final few seasons with us and they're annoyed "it's taking too long" because it probably won't.Ah, just enough time to add a shit load of trophies to our haul, just to piss everyone off that little bit more when we get to keep them all.