PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Jam Tomorrow said:
don’t they need a super majority of 14/6 to bring this in? If the turkeys want to vote for Christmas it’s up to them. on the face of it, shouldn’t impact us, unless there is something in the small print about clubs called Manchester City.
Click to expand...

I think Nobody can stop Manchester City Now, We are now more important to the Premier League because of the Worldwide TV audiences and our superstar players and manager selling the EPL rights to counties all over the world
 
Yeah but this time they don’t need evidence. They just have to think we probably did what we’re accused of. Theyl Fuck us over big time! But as someone else said on here earlier, it will all end up in a real court one day. One of the most powerful men in the world has his reputation on the line here. No way he’ll take it lying down
 
ancoats said:
I think the Premier League needs Manchester City more than ever now because we are the best-run club in football
and makes the most money and will only grow bigger and bigger,
Click to expand...
Hmm I’d like to think so but. If they get rid of us and the rags are getting government help to do up the swamp again! Everything will be like it was in the 90s. We aren’t wanted. They want the rags back on top. I’ve said before on here once we’reone the scum will copy our business model. The plans they have for the swamp is a carbon copy of the Etihad campus.
 
ancoats said:
I think Nobody can stop Manchester City Now, We are now more important to the Premier League because of the Worldwide TV audiences and our superstar players and manager selling the EPL rights to counties all over the world
Click to expand...
You'd like to think that mate and in an ideal world that's true.
But don't underestimate people in power cutting their nose off to spite their face.
A lot of people in power and with a lot of money make stupid decisions.
 
Berts Neck said:
Please excuse me for perhaps asking silly questions or making dubious points.
1. I have tried to ascertain exactly what the 115 charges are and cannot find this online anywhere.
2.Do the PL not have a duty to clarify these charges to fans of a club ?
3. When precisely did the PL become aware of these misdemeanours ?
4.My reasoning is simple. I do not hold a SC, go when I can.But say you are a SC holder, and were made aware of the charges you may not wish to renew your SC. You will have spent money following City on the premis we have done nil wrong.You will have paid for travel, SCs, and yet a possible sanction would be losing those titles which devalues the investment you have made following City.So you have incurred a loss.
5. If you have incurred a loss due to the intransigence of the PL are you able to make a claim in the small claims court ?? i am aware that you can make a personal claim against the CEO of an organisation if you have incurred a loss.
6. So let us say 5k SC City fans serve Richard Masters a notice to prosecute him personally for potential losses in light of the fact they have failed to clarify matters, when exactly accusing City of the same, is this argument feasible.

One for the leagal eagles.

I understand that one answer will be the claim could be made against City !!
Click to expand...
Ffs.
 
ancoats said:
here we go again changing the rules to suit the scum

Click to expand...


Am I missing something? UEFA still has a break-even requirement doesn't it? It's one of their three pillars: no "debts", % player costs and break-even. So all this talk of the PL dropping break-even to be in line with UEFA is bollocks?
 
Imo FFP was brought in to stop City spending and slow down their progression, for two reasons

1 so we couldn’t break up the cartel

2 and so they didn’t have to spend to keep up with us

The American owned clubs slowed spending down before City came into theirs. In the belief top 4 was secured for years to come all they want is to subsidise their American franchises. And using money from the Pl enables that.

Fortunately for us, and not them, they acted way too late.

So if the PL does go inline with UEFA I doubt these clubs will want to spend anywhere near what the new rules will allow
 
The Stockport Iniesta said:
The lunatics are well and truly running the asylum nowadays.
Click to expand...
I like the quote by the politician at the hearing, where at the end she said to Masters and Parry, We are at the point now, where if we had been at a match and you two were referees the crowd would be singing "You don't know what your doing"
 
Pontypool Blue said:
Only a year it feels like more?
Anyway I'm off out to get a cake with 1 candle to celebrate, might even do a bit of a song too!
Click to expand...
Ah a song ,maybe
LETS CHEAT AGAIN
LIKE WE DID LAST SEASON
LETS CHEAT AGAIN
LIKE WE'VE DONE FOR YEARS
you get the drift.
 
Damanino said:
many owners clearly happy with the PL revenues, the status of being a PL club owner, and the fact they can vote for saving their own ass in a way not really allowing for any ambitious other club to grow quickly let alone someone coming from Championship all of a sudden become a force.
on top of this with these rules they can always point at the rules when asked for spending more etc.

how mike Ashley would love these stricter rules...
Click to expand...

The nicest thing I can say about Ashley is how he fought his corner against Masters and the PL to get the takeover done. No love loss, he ran the club into the ground, but he played his part in taking legal action against the PL.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top