Yeah why? What do you know that I don't?Are you being serious?
Yeah why? What do you know that I don't?Are you being serious?
The funny thing is that he - like every other fucker - only ever wants to ask why City haven't been deducted points or dealt with as quickly as Everton.
However the more logical and relevant question especially for Dyche is "why have Everton been deducted points and Forest haven't?"
I have yet to see that question asked anywhere, let alone seen an answer.
Both have been charged under (presumably) the same rules for (presumably) the same time period yet Everton have had points deducted immediately and Forest are only above them in the table because they haven't. That is what should be concerning Gravel bonce, not sticking his nose into something he admits he doesn't understand.
Of course there may be some sensible explanation, but as far as I can see it's about as clear and transparent as VAR .
Everton and Notts Forest have to present their defence to an independent commission in a couple of months then if found guilty they'll be punished. Everton current points deduction was for last season they're most likely to get another points deduction in April together with Notts Forest at the same timeYeah why? What do you know that I don't?
You know, I really hadn't realised Everton had broken the rules twice.Everton and Notts Forest have to present their defence to an independent commission in a couple of months then if found guilty they'll be punished. Everton current points deduction was for last season they're most likely to get another points deduction in April together with Notts Forest at the same time
You know, I really hadn't realised Everton had broken the rules twice.
Fuck, that it is quite an achievement to be so crap even after cheating for two years in a row.
Meanwhile because City have been so good it means we must have cheated despite our audited accounts showing we haven't broken the rules?
On the one hand the team that actually cheated two years in a row is absolute crap, but a team with no evidence of cheating against them must have cheated because it is so good - some weird logic going on there.
Commentator on the match said that Everton's starting eleven today cost less than Grealish. Must be hugely difficult to fail FFP by 20 million when your first eleven only cost 100 million. Kudos.
You know, I really hadn't realised Everton had broken the rules twice.
Fuck, that it is quite an achievement to be so crap even after cheating for two years in a row.
Meanwhile because City have been so good it means we must have cheated despite our audited accounts showing we haven't broken the rules?
On the one hand the team that actually cheated two years in a row is absolute crap, but a team with no evidence of cheating against them must have cheated because it is so good - some weird logic going on there.
This is epic to listen to:
He might need 115 blood pressure pills!
One for Chris in London
Quick question. Will the IC conduct an initial review of the evidence etc similar to a pre tribunal hearing in order to assess the merits and demerits of each sides case? If so, is it possible that if the evidence is weak or non existent like in UEFAs case that the IC could close this process out much earlier than autumn 2025?
Yep the old boring money card yet nothing said when they play Dippers, Rags or Chelsea. Twitter full of bitter Everton fans saying the same re Grealish and how messed up the PL is but dont realise our turnover and profits to allow us to buy Grealish and Co.Commentator on the match said that Everton's starting eleven today cost less than Grealish. Must be hugely difficult to fail FFP by 20 million when your first eleven only cost 100 million. Kudos.
Do you reside in Liverpool?I've been out and about and had a few scoops with proper Evertonians, you know the ones that actually pay money to go to watch real games. There's no doubt that City, Newcastle, Everton, Chelsea, West Ham and Villa have well and truly sussed out the cartel, ie the rags, dips, tarqs and their little poodle spud. The PL cartel have thrown Everton under a bus to create a landscape where they can wallop City, its absolutely pathetic to treat a club like Everton in that way. I'm thinking in terms of fans not owners, sponsors or hangers on but fans. We the fans need to start to rise up against MUFC, LFC, AFC and the little poodle and tell them to FUCK RIGHT OFF, you're days are numbered, it's not your game !
Do you reside in Liverpool?
Nope, i live in Ancoats...., there are shit loads of scousers who live in manc city centre, just talking to EvertonIans today, it was heart warming to hear how much they despise the dips, its on another level. They know what's going on and they know Bil Kenwright sent HHSM packing when he tried to buy Everton before us. That's why they turned against him...Do you reside in Liverpool?
Boycott the games at their grounds ?I've been out and about and had a few scoops with proper Evertonians, you know the ones that actually pay money to go to watch real games. There's no doubt that City, Newcastle, Everton, Chelsea, West Ham and Villa have well and truly sussed out the cartel, ie the rags, dips, tarqs and their little poodle spud. The PL cartel have thrown Everton under a bus to create a landscape where they can wallop City, its absolutely pathetic to treat a club like Everton in that way. I'm thinking in terms of fans not owners, sponsors or hangers on but fans. We the fans need to start to rise up against MUFC, LFC, AFC and the little poodle and tell them to FUCK RIGHT OFF, you're days are numbered, it's not your game !
Thats not playing cricketBoycott the games at their grounds ?
The sentiment shown from this Wyness is pretty much that of 'I'm concerned city are going to get off with it'. So in his head it's like he's already decided we are guilty and the government are going to get us out of jail. Given he's an ex PL CEO is shows you the problem we're dealing with
![]()
Man City 115 charges: Ex-PL CEO 'concerned' about 'political fix'
Football Insider has been told by ex-Everton chief Keith Wyness that he is "concerned" about a potential "political fix" when Man City face a hearing for their 115 outstanding financial charges.www.footballinsider247.com
Geoffrey?Thats not playing cricket