United Thread - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cumbie Blue said:
I can't see ground share working at all. 29 home games last season for us lets assume 24 for both clubs, no rest for the pitch, potential for 4 games in 7 days on the surface on a regular basis, that's going to impact on the teams performance. That level of regular use is expected on community fields not an EPL ground, we don't need the revenue so on and off the pitch it makes no sense to us so its a no.

We've world leading ground staff and facilities but this is asking too much to maintain the standard required. For me there's a reason we've not held the Super League Magic weekend since we fulfilled contractual obligations back in 2014 and that's we don't need the cash or damage, better for us the grass recovers under the watchful eye of the grounds team over the breaks in the season and pretty sure this would be Pep's stance as well.
Click to expand...

Totally agree the pitch would be knackered by Christmas
 
Hi all.

Newcastle fan here. Last night I started the process of creating a government petition to prevent any tax payers money being given for Man Utd to rebuild or refurbish Old Trafford.
It is currently in the approval stage, and hopefully it will be approved.
If it is, I was wondering if I could provide a link to it when it was approved, if people on here would support it, and possibly help share it?

Government petitions generally have to be debated in parliament once they reach 100k signatures, so it could be a good way of saying that those who don’t approve of it, don’t want Man Utd and Jim Ratcliffe to have a stadium built for them via public funds.
 
give it to gordon said:
Totally agree the pitch would be knackered by Christmas
Click to expand...

It’s not about the pitch.

Don’t give the rag scum the steam off our piss.

These are the twats that have tried through uefa, the premier league and their cocksuckers in the media to fight us every inch and blacken our name.

When this case with the premier league is done innocent or not I want us to go for their throat’s
Uncovering all the shady dealings and corruption of the premier league and every club that have wronged us.
 
r.soleofsalford said:
It’s not about the pitch.

Don’t give the rag scum the steam off our piss.

These are the twats that have tried through uefa, the premier league and their cocksuckers in the media to fight us every inch and blacken our name.

When this case with the premier league is done innocent or not I want us to go for their throat’s
Uncovering all the shady dealings and corruption of the premier league and every club that have wronged us.
Click to expand...

I totally agree with you I was just saying the pitch wouldn't cope with over 100 matches !
 
I wonder what Jim ratcliffe real aims are
He tried to buy chelsea last year and now he is after united
Pretending to be a manc, but really couldn’t give a fuck
He is a strange character. Is it about profile? He is rich but does he now want some level of fame??
He obviously isn’t gonna spend his own money on anything and if he could ffp would stop him
 
Cumbie Blue said:
I can't see ground share working at all. 29 home games last season for us lets assume 24 for both clubs, no rest for the pitch, potential for 4 games in 7 days on the surface on a regular basis, that's going to impact on the teams performance. That level of regular use is expected on community fields not an EPL ground, we don't need the revenue so on and off the pitch it makes no sense to us so its a no.

We've world leading ground staff and facilities but this is asking too much to maintain the standard required. For me there's a reason we've not held the Super League Magic weekend since we fulfilled contractual obligations back in 2014 and that's we don't need the cash or damage, better for us the grass recovers under the watchful eye of the grounds team over the breaks in the season and pretty sure this would be Pep's stance as well.
Click to expand...
Fuck them, they can groundshare with Salford and FC United. They all play in red, they are all red mardarses, they all fuckin hate citeh, Gary chuckle has enough money to stump up costs.

There is not a cat in hells chance we will allow them cry babies to ground share with us. They'll just have to either not build another stadium or stay where they are.

Pricks.
 
Chris-NCL said:
Hi all.

Newcastle fan here. Last night I started the process of creating a government petition to prevent any tax payers money being given for Man Utd to rebuild or refurbish Old Trafford.
It is currently in the approval stage, and hopefully it will be approved.
If it is, I was wondering if I could provide a link to it when it was approved, if people on here would support it, and possibly help share it?

Government petitions generally have to be debated in parliament once they reach 100k signatures, so it could be a good way of saying that those who don’t approve of it, don’t want Man Utd and Jim Ratcliffe to have a stadium built for them via public funds.
Click to expand...
Can't see there being much objection on here.
 
Mr Fraser said:
Is ownership not thro ineos sport https://www.ineos.com/investors-companies

Investors | INEOS Group

Here you will find links to INEOS Group, INEOS Styrolution and INOVYN investor sites.
www.ineos.com www.ineos.com
Click to expand...

This. no?

Trawlers Limited is a company registered under the laws of Isle of Man, and is completely owned by Sir Jim Ratcliffe.
Ratcliffe had said from the beginning that he wouldn’t use any of INEOS’ funds to purchase the 25% stake in United and that seems to be the case here.
Essentially, a company vehicle has been created to oversee the deal and in practice, United will be owned by Trawlers Limited, with Sir Jim Ratcliffe as the CEO.
INEOS will have no interference, or have its funds used in the running of United and they will remain two separate entities.

Edit: If that is right, I hope all these people, like Brailsford, who will be helping United aren't being paid by Ineos Sport. That would be very bad, as we know about Mancini ......
 
Last edited:
Chris-NCL said:
Hi all.

Newcastle fan here. Last night I started the process of creating a government petition to prevent any tax payers money being given for Man Utd to rebuild or refurbish Old Trafford.
It is currently in the approval stage, and hopefully it will be approved.
If it is, I was wondering if I could provide a link to it when it was approved, if people on here would support it, and possibly help share it?

Government petitions generally have to be debated in parliament once they reach 100k signatures, so it could be a good way of saying that those who don’t approve of it, don’t want Man Utd and Jim Ratcliffe to have a stadium built for them via public funds.
Click to expand...
Howay then, drop the link
 
halfcenturyup said:
This. no?

Trawlers Limited is a company registered under the laws of Isle of Man, and is completely owned by Sir Jim Ratcliffe.
Ratcliffe had said from the beginning that he wouldn’t use any of INEOS’ funds to purchase the 25% stake in United and that seems to be the case here.
Essentially, a company vehicle has been created to oversee the deal and in practice, United will be owned by Trawlers Limited, with Sir Jim Ratcliffe as the CEO.
INEOS will have no interference, or have its funds used in the running of United and they will remain two separate entities.

Edit: If that is right, I hope all these people, like Brailsford, who will be helping United aren't being paid by Ineos Sport. That would be very bad, as we know about Mancini ......
Click to expand...
Trawlers lmfao
No doubt plenty of seagulls following.
 
halfcenturyup said:
This. no?

Trawlers Limited is a company registered under the laws of Isle of Man, and is completely owned by Sir Jim Ratcliffe.
Ratcliffe had said from the beginning that he wouldn’t use any of INEOS’ funds to purchase the 25% stake in United and that seems to be the case here.
Essentially, a company vehicle has been created to oversee the deal and in practice, United will be owned by Trawlers Limited, with Sir Jim Ratcliffe as the CEO.
INEOS will have no interference, or have its funds used in the running of United and they will remain two separate entities.

Edit: If that is right, I hope all these people, like Brailsford, who will be helping United aren't being paid by Ineos Sport. That would be very bad, as we know about Mancini ......
Click to expand...
WADA certainty won't be.
Two well dodgy Knights of the Realm.
 
halfcenturyup said:
This. no?

Trawlers Limited is a company registered under the laws of Isle of Man, and is completely owned by Sir Jim Ratcliffe.
Ratcliffe had said from the beginning that he wouldn’t use any of INEOS’ funds to purchase the 25% stake in United and that seems to be the case here.
Essentially, a company vehicle has been created to oversee the deal and in practice, United will be owned by Trawlers Limited, with Sir Jim Ratcliffe as the CEO.
INEOS will have no interference, or have its funds used in the running of United and they will remain two separate entities.

Edit: If that is right, I hope all these people, like Brailsford, who will be helping United aren't being paid by Ineos Sport. That would be very bad, as we know about Mancini ......
Click to expand...
shirt or ground sponsorship incoming
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top