PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

WRicko said:
I don’t think you understand my point wasn’t that the fact the article exists is odd it makes perfect sense that it does and it should exist what’s odd is our figures not making any sense especially when it’s not even written to grab anti city click bate
Click to expand...
GiveMeSport: "We are looking for writers who can commit to producing 15 1,500-word articles per week (ideally Mon-Fri, three per day) paid at a rate of £25 per article"

That's why the data is wrong, and no-one is going to fix it.
 
WRicko said:
I don’t think you understand my point wasn’t that the fact the article exists is odd it makes perfect sense that it does and it should exist what’s odd is our figures not making any sense especially when it’s not even written to grab anti city click bate
Click to expand...
Of course we're added for the click bait, we're the biggest name in the PL if not in world football. Any click bait article is missing out if they don't include us, actual facts don't concern them. I can't see why this would be news to any Blue.
 
bluenova said:
GiveMeSport: "We are looking for writers who can commit to producing 15 1,500-word articles per week (ideally Mon-Fri, three per day) paid at a rate of £25 per article"

That's why the data is wrong, and no-one is going to fix it.
Click to expand...
Wow and you’re correct. In old money: 3 A4 pages @ 500 words per page. Repeat three per day each weekday and ongoing. I would guess an average hour a page start to finish if you’re a accomplished writer.
Fifteen articles, 45 pages of A4 a week. That’s some volume and basically full time hours on a treadmill.
Forgetting the £375 earned per week if all published- what quality of work could someone produce without inventing shit up or making assumptions or copying others.
I bet the final submission isn’t quality checked let alone fact checked.
 
BeerIsTheBest said:
Wow and you’re correct. In old money: 3 A4 pages @ 500 words per page. Repeat three per day each weekday and ongoing. I would guess an average hour a page start to finish if you’re a accomplished writer.
Fifteen articles, 45 pages of A4 a week. That’s some volume and basically full time hours on a treadmill.
Forgetting the £375 earned per week if all published- what quality of work could someone produce without inventing shit up or making assumptions or copying others.
I bet the final submission isn’t quality checked let alone fact checked.
Click to expand...

This is how Mail Online operates as well - or at least used to about 10 years ago.

It's mostly staffed by new graduates and unemployed journalists trying to get some money in the door while they look for another job. I had a friend from Uni do it and he said it's about as shit a job as you can imagine. It pays badly, it's quite hard work, you don't get your own desk or anything, it's a really mean place to work (people and bosses) and you get loads of shit and abuse online for weeks whenever some stupid article you've been told to write goes viral for being stupid.
 
BeerIsTheBest said:
Wow and you’re correct. In old money: 3 A4 pages @ 500 words per page. Repeat three per day each weekday and ongoing. I would guess an average hour a page start to finish if you’re a accomplished writer.
Fifteen articles, 45 pages of A4 a week. That’s some volume and basically full time hours on a treadmill.
Forgetting the £375 earned per week if all published- what quality of work could someone produce without inventing shit up or making assumptions or copying others.
I bet the final submission isn’t quality checked let alone fact checked.
Click to expand...
Most probably use AI to write it for them these days!
 
Centurions said:
Of course we're added for the click bait, we're the biggest name in the PL if not in world football. Any click bait article is missing out if they don't include us, actual facts don't concern them. I can't see why this would be news to any Blue.
Click to expand...
You are missing the point still It’s a review of all the premier clubs not even with a negative city headline they could have used any figures for us seeing as they got them wrong and the affect would be the same from a click point of view. And if they thought they needed a negative slant they could have picked any negative figure but some how they got the figures completely wrong in a negative way with no apparent justification for why they got that figure and not a different figure
 
@projectriver I see Matt law is suddenly very concerned about Chelsea failing PSR today.

Hasn’t he been telling you that you’re wrong about Chelsea’s finance for the last 6 months?
 
It is in the Daily United, so a large pinch of salt comes with the post.

Football's spending rules are facing further scrutiny after it emerged that Leicester have dodged sanctions this season by claiming to be both a Premier League and an EFL club at the same time.

Mail Sport has learned that Leicester have not complied with the Premier League's new fast-track system for potential spending breaches this season despite being at risk of breaking their Profit and Sustainability rules [PSR] for 2022/23 as they were relegated at the end of that campaign, but also avoided being subjected to an EFL spending plan this year on the grounds that they were a top-flight club last season.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Leicester exploit huge loophole in football's spending rules

EXCLUSIVE BY MATT HUGHES: Leicester have complied with neither the Premier League's fast-track system or the EFL's demands to produce a spending plan.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
 
jrb said:
It is in the Daily United, so a large pinch of salt comes with the post.

Football's spending rules are facing further scrutiny after it emerged that Leicester have dodged sanctions this season by claiming to be both a Premier League and an EFL club at the same time.

Mail Sport has learned that Leicester have not complied with the Premier League's new fast-track system for potential spending breaches this season despite being at risk of breaking their Profit and Sustainability rules [PSR] for 2022/23 as they were relegated at the end of that campaign, but also avoided being subjected to an EFL spending plan this year on the grounds that they were a top-flight club last season.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Leicester exploit huge loophole in football's spending rules

EXCLUSIVE BY MATT HUGHES: Leicester have complied with neither the Premier League's fast-track system or the EFL's demands to produce a spending plan.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
Click to expand...
I’m not sure they are exploiting a loophole.
If those are the rules that’s fine.
If the bent bastards who make the rules can’t get their act together it’s their fault- it’s not a loophole.
 
Stoned Rose said:
Imagine if Spurs had 643m to spend.
Click to expand...
That does not surprise me at all.

Despite a lack of success, they do generate lots of money, and their new stadium has pushed up their income even more. They were not far off Liverpool in their last accounts.

The difference is that they have always been very careful spenders, so it would not shock me if their wages + player amortisation is much lower than any other club that size.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top