Quite right.I prefer Citys approach allowing him to stew in his own piss, if we were remotely worried about clowns like this we would have reacted.
I'm pretty sure we will serve our revenge nice and cold.
No. Being a blue not a protected characteristicWould a City Scottish stand more chance of sucess, under teir new rules on hate speech?
I found this post strangely arousing.Give me 2 minutes with this prick and he'll change his fucking tune alright. He'll be an arsehole with a new arsehole torn into him. I'd rip his head off and shit down his neck.
Sorry I’m confused, are you a YouTube fan or not?Give me 2 minutes with this prick and he'll change his fucking tune alright. He'll be an arsehole with a new arsehole torn into him. I'd rip his head off and shit down his neck.
Problem is, all that was done off the books with brown envelopes... the trail was easier to hide that it is in today's modern digital age... no wonder he retired when he did.Maybe this actor needs to look at his clubs cheating and his manager with the dodgy players his son his company overpaid for! Oh and isn't the media on so quiet about that! Scummy kunts
If it came from an O.S.C.it would carry more weight as representatives of the fan base. Even a press release giving views on the constant attacks on our club about 115, state owned, cheats, etc.would be a start.Just out of interest, it's not just the likes of Carragher, Neville, Roan and Goldbridge who have crossed the line, but also Sky, the BBC and Talksport for broadcasting it? Could we (I don't mean the club, I mean concerned citizens) not put together a list of the various offenders/offences and distribute it to those organisations, along with a summary of the risks they are running by allowing those people to continue?
Good call. It certainly would add more weight to defending us from the ill informed, speculative and downright libellous attacks from the press, so called expert radio pundits and the spoon fed, easily led public.If it came from an O.S.C.it would carry more weight as representatives of the fan base. Even a press release giving views on the constant attacks on our club about 115, state owned, cheats, etc.would be a start.
I’d love to see the likes of Harris and Delaney having to publicly admit they got it all wrong to get out of being taken to the cleaners for their libellous shite over the last few years.Haven’t clicked on it, don’t need to as I know what the tedious **** will have said.
I hope, but don’t remotely expect the club to engage in a campaign of retribution against the most strident and egregious (and high profile) actors in defamation against the club once these preposterous charges are disproved.
Some, like Jordon are canny enough to stay (just) the right side of the line, but others (notably Carragher when he questioned the veracity of our accounts recently) have not and I just wish there were legal consequences for that, especially given the platform he was airing it on.
I’m not holding my breath though.
Not going to happen. The cunts will double down, pontificate about freedom of speech and hide behind the doctrine of vicarious liability.I’d love to see the likes of Harris and Delaney having to publicly admit they got it all wrong to get out of being taken to the cleaners for their libellous shite over the last few years.
As Harris is freelance not sure he could hide behind vicarious liability but I’m not a lawyer and you are.Not going to happen. The cunts will double down, pontificate about freedom of speech and hide behind the doctrine of vicarious liability.
I’m not a proper one…As Harris is freelance not sure he could hide behind vicarious liability but I’m not a lawyer and you are.
As a non-lawyer you do a decent impression of one!I’m not a proper one…
I’ve been doing that for the last eleven years!As a non-lawyer you do a decent impression of one!
Carragher hasn't got a clue about our finances. He also Isn't qualified to talk about FFP at all.Haven’t clicked on it, don’t need to as I know what the tedious **** will have said.
I hope, but don’t remotely expect the club to engage in a campaign of retribution against the most strident and egregious (and high profile) actors in defamation against the club once these preposterous charges are disproved.
Some, like Jordon are canny enough to stay (just) the right side of the line, but others (notably Carragher when he questioned the veracity of our accounts recently) have not and I just wish there were legal consequences for that, especially given the platform he was airing it on.
I’m not holding my breath though.
Just out of interest, it's not just the likes of Carragher, Neville, Roan and Goldbridge who have crossed the line, but also Sky, the BBC and Talksport for broadcasting it? Could we (I don't mean the club, I mean concerned citizens) not put together a list of the various offenders/offences and distribute it to those organisations, along with a summary of the risks they are running by allowing those people to continue?
Similar timing to me and exactly the same reason!Packed in Talksport back in 2012 when they had that idiot Ronnie Iranie slagging City off and lying that he was watching United when he was actually playing cricket. Don’t go near that awful radio station, it’s not produced for our benefit.
Are you saying we could be the ‘South Africa’ & bring the case forward?
:)
I was just thinking the broadcasters and their talking heads are way too comfortable at the moment, knowing the club isn't going to do anything and probably won't even after they are cleared. A little reminder of their "responsibilities' with examples of when they have gone too far may, at least, make their lawyers think again about what is broadcast. Or maybe it wouldn't. It was just a question, really.
I’d love an interviewer to say “And which particular items on the accounts do you doubt and why?”Carragher hasn't got a clue about our finances. He also Isn't qualified to talk about FFP at all.
I think they can argue that they are not reporting we are guilty just reporting the charges and opinions if they said we was guilty maybe if they said we are guilty and none of the charge stuff was happen then things would be different it’s a shame such seemingly flimsy charges can give them cover but they carry weight and give the media cover:)
I was just thinking the broadcasters and their talking heads are way too comfortable at the moment, knowing the club isn't going to do anything and probably won't even after they are cleared. A little reminder of their "responsibilities' with examples of when they have gone too far may, at least, make their lawyers think again about what is broadcast. Or maybe it wouldn't. It was just a question, really.