Everyone can do that. It was offside. Again though, if they wanted them through they wouldn’t have awarded the pen for cov. This moaning is RAWK like.Its offside if you dont put the line in the right place and/or dont measure from the end of the defenders foot but the middle instead
Quite right. Thing to remember is what the offside law was introduced for.
It was brought in to prevent what we used to call ‘goal hanging‘. It was not introduced to try see if a bloke with size 11 feet is marginally closer to the goal that the bloke with size 6’s!
Have never understood why they don’t just say, if ANY part of an attacker is onside, it’s onside. It’d clear all this nonsense up once and for all and would help the assistant referees no end.
Finally, to people who say ‘they’re the rules’, so is the rule saying the keeper should be behind the line until the kick is taken, which was undoubtedly ignored in that shoot out.
That angle and them lines he looks onside lol, but when I watched the reply live I did think shit he's offside. He was just offside sadly.Its offside if you dont put the line in the right place and/or dont measure from the end of the defenders foot but the middle instead
Yes, I have spoken about that before (and others have posted analysis from experts regarding those limitations) and that is part of my point.There is always an error as the frame rate of the cameras is not real time. It can be as much as several inches depending on how fast players are moving and how hard the ball is struck
Not luck, just bent.Is there a luckier team around.
They are a fucking joke.
Every fucking week!
No the rules have just been altered .Will onana, be suspended for the final? Martinez misses Villas next European match?
Wan Bisakas boots, and he still played the attacker off!Line goes thru the middle of AWB foot
I think he'll get a ban for the next league match.
I'd say you can't make it up.Didn't watch this but did watch the dippers game, goal scored and VAR decided it was so tight that they stayed with the on field decision - benefited the dippers obviously.
Cov foot is at 45 angle United player at straight ahead not sure how you can measure that accurately to rule out goalIts offside if you dont put the line in the right place and/or dont measure from the end of the defenders foot but the middle instead
This is correct.It wouldn’t clear anything up. You’re just moving the issue further up the field. Would still be as many marginal calls as there are now.
Simple answer is to have automated offside not some blind/bent/bias/bribable person running it, then it’s quick and acceptable to fans.There is always an error as the frame rate of the cameras is not real time. It can be as much as several inches depending on how fast players are moving and how hard the ball is struck
You know just thinking when the rags were winning titles and getting to FA Cup finals not once did we come close yes we were shit,but now the tables have turned I find it strange that they have got to finals when basically they are shit as well something just doesn’t add up ..
Absolutely, the Casimero 'tackle' was right in front of us , to say I was outraged that the free kick was given to the rags is an understatementSure look at last years final. Casimero should have got a straight red yet the ref gave them a free kick!..then the Grealish penalty. There were other things but can’t be arsed with the favouritism they get anymore. It’s a joke.
its quite simple. You measure the part of the foot which is the furthest forward. VAR havent dont this as can be clearly seen on the pics in this incident…Cov foot is at 45 angle United player at straight ahead not sure how you can measure that accurately to rule out goal