PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

For someone who sat and read every word of this exchange.

According to Nick:

1) Nick doesn't think the emails will be enough because the PL lawyers know it won't be enough.
2) UEFA aren't giving evidence to the PL lawyers.
3) Nick knows what evidence the PL lawyers have and don't have, and is concerned they won't be able to demonstrate the main charges.
Did he get challenged on why why the PL Lawyers think this is the case?

Maybe…just maybe, because there is no compelling or substantive evidence that would stand up to any reasonable scrutiny, certainly not in the face of a body if irrefutable evidence?

Lol.

He looks like someone who’s just gone and bought a big f*ckoff spade and is trying to pretend it’s because he’s an archaeologist…
 
Do you mean he's not stupid because he works in a bank or he's not stupid because nudge nudge wink wink he said we got 115 charges?
What I'm saying is that if the 115 charges and guilty story has reached him, an intelligent guy who works in finance and understands fraud, and its persuaded him to message about it, then it proves the story is out of control and it is causing irreparable damage

When we were shit and people said "City are shit" we had to take it as it was true.
But when we beat the charges we will always be tarnished and called "cheats" and it is entirely the lack of any action from the club to not counter the story
 
With all this iron clad evidence against city I expect the legal authorities and HMRC to take the Harris and Hat threads to smash in the CFG front doors first thing in the morning.

Surely it’s time for the relevant authorities to act….

Nah? Didn’t think so. Twitter is a certified nut house. The degrading level people will go to in order to become a celebrity to other strangers is a sight to behold.
 
I was thinking about this.

Khaldoon is a very, very serious player. Not some spiv off Bury Market.

I'm sure his English is excellent. As good as any native's. He said 'irrefutable evidence.' That's a very high bar. He could have chosen many less definite constructions, without saying: 'They've got us bang to rights, guv.'

If the police came around tonight and accused me of murdering someone, I doubt I could offer 'irrefutable evidence' that I didn't. I'm confident I could present evidence sufficient to persuade a jury that I was not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

'Irrefutable evidence' would be me saying to the police: 'An independent cameraman filmed me for every single minute of yesterday. Here's the video. Feel free to run it past your technical people.'

A very high bar indeed. And if he is exaggerating he is going to look a right cock, as well as a liar. I find it hard to believe a guy like Khaldoon would be so reckless. Especially as it's not just his reputation on the line, but that of Sheikh Mansour, and by extension that of the UAE royal family. I mean, come on. These are people with huge resources and a shedload of influence. They aren't going to be happy if they are made to look like cocks and liars. No way is Khaldoon such a fool. No fucking way.
Irrefutable evidence refers to evidence that cannot be disputed, challenged, or denied. It is considered to be incontrovertible and provides a conclusive proof of a particular fact or phenomenon.

A high bar indeed.
 
Talk about indirectly outing your alter ego.

So magic hat, from North America, knows about us does he?

I bet Nick fuckin fruitloop cockwomble nuttier than a shithouse rat Harris accidentally told "Magic hat" about us when they was talking to eachother in a mirror.

Nick, you plonka, turn it in will you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jrb
Irrefutable evidence refers to evidence that cannot be disputed, challenged, or denied. It is considered to be incontrovertible and provides a conclusive proof of a particular fact or phenomenon.

A high bar indeed.

1716958449489.gif
 
I think this is Magic Hat. He is wearing a red silk bathrobe which means he must be an Arsenal fan. And, there is a laptop nearby so that he can send out another scoop of revelations about City using content that has been freely available online for some time. Just need to find out where he lives now. It's only a matter of time.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240529-214941_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20240529-214941_Chrome.jpg
    114.8 KB · Views: 96
NH (rightly imo) thinks he's rehashing old news as new evidence, and thinks his interpretation of the evidence is naive at best and ludicrous at worst. He wants to know what his experience is based on the fact that the hat fella thinks the emails will be enough to secure a guilty verdict when anyone close to the case and/or familiar with how these things work are adamant they won't be.
It's ironic, though, that NH is taking umbrage with someone who is unqualified to comment on financial and legal matters, given that's been his MO for at least a decade now.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top