City launch legal action against the Premier League | Club & PL reach settlement | Proceedings dropped (p1147)

blueju said:
The comments sections are off the charts. Demanding we’re Hung drawn and quartered immediately, this proves we’re guilty, biggest cheats in history, got the most expensive lawyers, time wasting….id imagine there’ll be ‘fans’ all over the place unable to concentrate at work, seething, waiting for the next piece of sensationalised drivel from the usual suspects, whilst most of Dublin conveniently ignores the disgusting news emerging about the sponsors splashed across their club pyjamas.
Click to expand...

Matt, we'll give you an exclusive, but it has to come out on Tuesday. Some shit is coming out about our shirt sponsor on Tuesday. We need you to deflect it away from that. Thanks. LFC.
 
Just watching sky sports news, got 2 journalists on, Henry Winter and John Cross, both of them slating City for having the audacity to defend ourselves.
We're damaging the reputation of the brand, the Premier league, all the other teams should rally against us ( they've been doing that since the takeover) we're entering unknown territory and going against the grain of everything that the competition stands for.
Where we're these cunts when the Premier league and uefa started the clear and obvious witch hunt against us, did they defend us, did they speak positively about us, did they fuck, they jumped in with both feet in support of the cartel clubs and the vendetta against us, guilty as charged, hung drawn and quartered.
We'll fuck you all, if you keep backing a dog into a corner it's gonna bite back at some time, I hope we have evidence and bring the whole shit show to its knees, sort your leaks out you shower of cunts.
 
Just think when all this and 115 come to a conclusion the media click cash comes to an end! It's making them thousands of pounds and they are loving it the kunts
 
Fordyboy46 said:
Same here mate, got shoot delivered weekly back then and fuck me the excitement of getting the Christmas edition and the edition with the free Panini album was off the scale as a kid. Happy happy days
Click to expand...
I’ve forgotten which comic it was that gave out a cardboard sheet with ladders for all four divisions and a marker for each team to slot in. Early every Sunday morning, I snaffled our Sunday Express and adjusted my ladders. Magic.
 
Bottom line on this case? Disguising owner investment as sponsorship by a related company doesn't sound a particularly good thing, but does the case really go to the anti-competitive rules against owner investment that make related party sponsorship a way round those unfair rules?

It should be fairly easy to show that the rules were designed to restrict new entrants to a cartel, and not about financial sustainability when prospective owners could buy clubs with money they hadn't got and load the club with debt while personally taking money out of revenue after servicing the debt (and with some overvalued sponsorship - e.g. Chevrolet).
 
Last edited:
KS55 said:
I’ve forgotten which comic it was that gave out a cardboard sheet with ladders for all four divisions and a marker for each team to slot in. Early every Sunday morning, I snaffled our Sunday Express and adjusted my ladders. Magic.
Click to expand...
Think it was 'The Tiger' with Roy Race of Melchester Rovers.
 
The disingenuous way in which the press are reporting this is to be expected what they are failing to do is give it any context, what city are basically saying is that it is unfair that anybody decides how much money we get to earn and that these rules have only just been put in place to stop us and that is anticompetitive, in no other business in the world does an independent body get to decide the value of something, that is basic economics that the market sets the value, eg quite frankly if any journalists over 10 quid a year then in my opinion they are overpaid and their wages should be cut but i dont set the value and that is why.
 
Academica said:
Just read this explanation of tyranny of the majority on twitter.

Tyranny of the majority describes a scenario where the majority enforces its will on the minority, often to the detriment of minority rights and interests. While democracy aims to balance the will of the majority with the protection of individual and minority rights, tyranny of the majority refers to the failure of this balance, leading to majoritarian overreach and potential injustice
Click to expand...
Yes. The tyranny of the majority has always been my criticism of Utilitarianism. The greatest good to the greatest number sounds fine until you ask: “But what happens to minorities.?” Utilitarians like Jeremy Bentham never answered this question. In the nineteenth century women were treated as a minority and the women’s suffrage movement both here and in the US had to overcome utilitarian ideas in smug parliaments. That in itself was a huge struggle.
 
Gone for a Burton said:
So another leak of a supposedly confidential case......Deja Vu.

City will have been advised by the most competent of legal and commercial lawyers and will not have pressed the case unless they had been assured of an unbeatable case and successful outcome.

The clubs are divided & the PL will be broken if this case is won.

HH Sheikh Mansour has been provoked and his tanks are now parked on the PLs grass & have fired the first shells of the battle.

The cost will be very high for the loser.

Fortunate favours the just and brave !!
Click to expand...
Pity we haven’t still got Swales then.
 
KS55 said:
Yes. The tyranny of the majority has always been my criticism of Utilitarianism. The greatest good to the greatest number sounds fine until you ask: “But what happens to minorities.?” Utilitarians like Jeremy Bentham never answered this question. In the nineteenth century women were treated as a minority and the women’s suffrage movement both here and in the US had to overcome utilitarian ideas in smug parliaments. That in itself was a huge struggle.
Click to expand...
It's a criticism of democracy. See India.
Or Israel. Not Britain where FTPT has meant tyranny of the minority.
 
Ric said:
I still think United are far more likely to have sided with the PL on this, personally.
Click to expand...

Of course they will they aren't owned by the Middle East! You just have to look at Chelsea with there new shirt sponsor all fine and dandy
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top