Altercation at Terminal 2

Bigga said:
I'm not really sure how to respond to someone who chooses not absorb conversation. I asked you to reveal your experience of being in a similar situation as to what I discussed. You chose to say "...typical assumption you jump to, knowing other people's experiences. Every time! You are the only authority on discrimination sexism violence and everything that poor sheltered everyone else has no comprehension of."

Not even close to anything I said. But, you do you, Boo. I hope you feel amazing from it.

And my adding of "scrotes" changed after I saw the second contextual video and violence emitted. The violence was unacceptable, but that's me having better context and not assuming like you did from the off.

That does not excuse the actions of the policeman after containing the suspect.

So, let me ask again the question ignored earlier about feeling 'threatened' and not 'angry'; why didn't he deploy a second taser rather than kick and stamp the man...??
Click to expand...

I think it is impossible for you or I to determine whether he was angry, threatened, or both.

It is easier to comment whether the situation was under control or if the guy was bo longer a threat. And I thinknhe still was and that was a step in getting control of the situation. As we see by his further need to restrain him evena fter the kick.
 
Bigga said:
So, your argument is 'it was better to enact physically over deploying a secondary taser from safe distance'?

Okay. Got it.
Click to expand...
I'm saying he did what what necessary and I for one fully support him in his actions, you are the other hand are a repetitive, anti poice nut job. I hope it's warm in that ivory tower and you never need police help after the support and concern you've shown for our officers of the law. Top man.
 
Coatigan said:
I think it is impossible for you or I to determine whether he was angry, threatened, or both.

It is easier to comment whether the situation was under control or if the guy was bo longer a threat. And I thinknhe still was and that was a step in getting control of the situation. As we see by his further need to restrain him evena fter the kick.
Click to expand...
Or concussed?
 
Drewmanc said:
I'm saying he did what what necessary and I for one fully support him in his actions, you are the other hand are a repetitive, anti poice nut job. I hope it's warm in that ivory tower and you never need police help after the support and concern you've shown for our officers of the law. Top man.
Click to expand...
^^100% this ^^

The Police's first concern was to make the scene safe and if there is any doubt whatsoever then take appropriate action. There was no time for him to kneel down and have a chat to determine how the twat was feeling and to see if he would be likely to react he had to act and neutralise him. Had he not reacted as he did and the incident developed further which was a possible likelihood and members of the public were injured or killed.... everyone would have been on the coppers back for him not doing what he was paid for.
Where the fuck does an iota of sympathy for these cunts come from?
 
BerkshireBlue said:
and what if the guy managed to get up and started fighting again. What would you do then
Click to expand...
Use the taser. Restrain him. They are trained to avoid a street fight. The guy was on the floor. He was not getting back up. Otherwise we have anarchy on streets.
 
Bez said:
Use the taser. Restrain him. They are trained to avoid a street fight. The guy was on the floor. He was not getting back up. Otherwise we have anarchy on streets.
Click to expand...
you only have one shot with the taser with two dangerous men in close proximity
 
BerkshireBlue said:
you only have one shot with the taser with two dangerous men in close proximity
Click to expand...

Think it might be 2 but no sure
He definitely uses it once, if you watch the video after the initial attack from the big lad you see a spark in between their hands, the big lad jerks his hands away like he’s had a shock and then sits down
 
Blackley_Blue said:
I'd just like to point out (again) that the copper in question had been smacked around the head and ear several times causing a loud ringing and hearing loss ...

They could've shouted TASER TASER on a megaphone and he'd have struggled to hear it
Click to expand...
That won't hold up in court. He could clearly see the prick was incapacitated on the floor, so then took a revenge kick. If the same thing happened in a town centre, the one kicking someone in the head when they're already knocked out on the floor is seen as a coward and gets prison.
 
Marklr said:
That won't hold up in court. He could clearly see the prick was incapacitated on the floor, so then took a revenge kick. If the same thing happened in a town centre, the one kicking someone in the head when they're already knocked out on the floor is seen as a coward and gets prison.
Click to expand...

I think the fact he lost his glasses while being attacked stating that he could “ clearly see “ is what won’t hold up in court
 
bluemc1 said:
I think the fact he lost his glasses while being attacked stating that he could “ clearly see “ is what won’t hold up in court
Click to expand...
It was a good shot considering he couldn't see. What will he claim, he was trying to kick a ball that had rolled into the area?
 
Marklr said:
That won't hold up in court. He could clearly see the prick was incapacitated on the floor, so then took a revenge kick. If the same thing happened in a town centre, the one kicking someone in the head when they're already knocked out on the floor i s seen as a coward and gets prison.
Click to expand...
He will say he had to make sure the guy stayed down and didn't grab his gun, thus protecting himself and the public. Only he knows whether he was really thinking revenge.
I don't know what a jury might decide, or the internal police investigation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top