Maybe he can slide awayDon’t look back in anger!
Maybe he can slide awayDon’t look back in anger!
Which chippy in Cleckheaton
Not been in that one it’s mainly tea cakes but it’s YorkshireThe one that sell chip muffins.
Don’t look back in anger!
Once again influence simply cannot happen, however the panel rule they have to show ironclad legal reasoning for the decision that they came too and because the red tops pet press really really want them to be guilty just aint gonna cut it.media coverage will be so desperate once the hearing starts. even if panel knows not to be influenced by media, you can imagine the added level of vitriol from all usual suspects and even secret PL executives offering words.
can see this autumn having some fights around or in stadiums between fans due to this topic. media will up the "tempo", expect that guy who called City fans rats or what the hell write some new articles. was it Syed or some other fool.
from our lawyers it would be a nice gift to take some pro bono cases of going after some journos and put them straight after all this is done. unfortunately we will put out the red carpet and hospitality to them still at Etihad.
cannot imagine what Whiskey Ferguson would have done with a journo criticizing his club as our club is attacked constantly. he banned some for much much less. but there is a line which is long stepped over where that would have been the bare minimum in our case.
the one asking Pep of taking bungs from City, imagine thats asked of the old Redface hahaha, he probably would have asked the security to take him outside and wait for him to turn up after the presser with a hammer or talk to his bosses to get rid of him and make him unemployed.
Don't blame you - I gave it away after the first couple of comments.
Don't blame you - I gave it away after the first couple of comments.
I absolutely fucking despise the way that trash publications put things ‘in quotes’ likes that in headlines in an attempt to create shock and grab attention. It’s cheap and spineless.Football365 are pretty well convinced that we are guilty. Oh hang on, they are now we'll convinced we're innocent.
Confused or just a clever way of getting click money from people.
View attachment 129550View attachment 129551
Won't be long now just a few more monthsCan't it be over with already, sick to death of all the bollocks
It’ll never be over with, they’ll come up with something else once we’re cleared, that’s the only reason it all exists - bitterness. Part of me thinks the PL will punish us anyway so they can keep it going (through the courts) for another 5 or 10 years. Those “in charge” of the PL know they will be done and dusted by then either way, in fact they’ll stay in a paid position longer if they try to make the charges stick.Can't it be over with already, sick to death of all the bollocks
Just the things that their desciples want to be fed.I absolutely fucking despise the way that trash publications put things ‘in quotes’ likes that in headlines in an attempt to create shock and grab attention. It’s cheap and spineless.
Once you understand that their sole purpose is just to get clicks, which then gives them data tat they then sell on to advertisers which makes them money you don’t bother clicking or if you do never accept cookiesI absolutely fucking despise the way that trash publications put things ‘in quotes’ likes that in headlines in an attempt to create shock and grab attention. It’s cheap and spineless.
Once you understand that their sole purpose is just to get clicks, which then gives them data tat they then sell on to advertisers which makes them money you don’t bother clicking or if you do never accept cookies
In theory, three month hearing,three month deliberation and the potential of appeal either way,so it's a fair way off unfortunately.Won't be long now just a few more months
Once you understand that their sole purpose is just to get clicks, which then gives them data tat they then sell on to advertisers which makes them money you don’t bother clicking or if you do never accept cookies
I admire your naivety, personally I think we'll be found guilty of most charges with scant evidence just like UEFA's independent panel, it'll be buried under the red-top outrage to disassemble Manchester City and ten year bans.Once again influence simply cannot happen, however the panel rule they have to show ironclad legal reasoning for the decision that they came too and because the red tops pet press really really want them to be guilty just aint gonna cut it.
It's nothing like the UEFA panel,much closer to the CAS one.I admire your naivety, personally I think we'll be found guilty of most charges with scant evidence just like UEFA's independent panel, it'll be buried under the red-top outrage to disassemble Manchester City and ten year bans.
You will catch a few with that.I admire your naivety, personally I think we'll be found guilty of most charges with scant evidence just like UEFA's independent panel, it'll be buried under the red-top outrage to disassemble Manchester City and ten year bans.