There is absolutely no need for City to charge extra if ticket-holding fans want to use the new facilities. Many of those fans will be paying a fuck ton of money once inside anyway and that’s how it will pay for itself over time.
That is now outdated btw, been replaced with the latest amendment. Not the uses themselves, just the proportion of them.
I’m waiting for City to announce you’ll have to pay to go in the fan zone, nominal fee of £5 for the privilege another way to fleece the fans.
Skybar view is not going to be that brilliant is it? Not that I'll ever get the chance to get in it mind.
Can we all get together and pretend we are a family unit?I’m definitely going to do the roof walk. There probably won’t be much change left from £30-£40 for that.
Can we all get together and pretend we are a family unit?
I never said they would. Another poster suggested they might and then others defended the club's right to do soSo what makes you think they would then charge fans extra just to enter the zone? Beyond an innate distrust?
Skybar view is not going to be that brilliant is it? Not that I'll ever get the chance to get in it mind.
I never said they would. Another poster suggested they might and then others defended the club's right to do so
Agree, what a ****"fleece the fans"
FFS, with what we have seen in the last decade, I would rethink your terminology.
Exactly, and yet people are arguing about it. At least with the 600 odd GA+ seats there's some room for doubt.City won’t charge for entrance to the fan zone or City Hall on a match day.
It’s part of the stand. In fact it’s the main indoor area of the stand. I don’t see any reason for the club to charge fans to go in there. City Hall also gives fans access to their seats in the stand.
Because all this has to be paid for somehow, it is a distrust as we become more successful people moved out of seats, increase in ticket prices etc. it’s the price you pay for success I suppose. They more than likely won’t charge, yet, but when someone cottons on they probably can, like charging the disabled to park then I wouldn’t put it past them.Apologies, thought it was the same person in both posts that I was responding to. Meant for @Blue Maverick .
Why do you say that? Due to the distance? For the people who can afford that I'm not certain that's going to be much of an issue. It would certainly be a different experience.Skybar view is not going to be that brilliant is it? Not that I'll ever get the chance to get in it mind.
The people in there will watch the game on the TV.Will be similar to the view from the top of the south stand back rows. But it will be the separate facilities, access, its own lift, and bar and offerings that is what will sell it, rather than the view. I would imagine.
The people in there will watch the game on the TV.