My guess would be late March at the earliest. A 10-12 week hearing covering multiple alleged serious charges won't be decided quickly when deliberating unless it is an absolute slam dunk for either party. And that includes the panel forgoing Christmas dinner too :)Yes judges will be deliberating throughout Jan. so more like Feb we will finally find the fuker out (imho). Happy to start any sportsmans bets - what about I start - Valentines Day massacre **FRIDAY FEB. 14th**
Regarding our case on them twats sure I read somewhere good chance the actual outcome won't be released . . .
Times vs The Sun
Bigger words and less tits and bingo.
Liverpool and Arsenal are not shit they're just not as good as us.It's their comfort blanket that explains why their team are shit and not special
Strange that the very people who demanded justice after Hillsborough have already decided our guilt in the comments, and frightening to think some of these could actually have been on jury service. The very same people who attended a victory parade on the day of the Heysel anniversary.One thing you don't need to speculate on is how many people were murdered at Heysel and by who. It's sometimes worth putting things into perspective, lar.
Doesn't Winter write for the times, so I'm not so sure about the tits, so ,Times vs The Sun
Bigger words and less tits and bingo.
Strange that the very people who demanded justice after Hillsborough have already decided our guilt in the comments, and frightening to think some of these could actually have been on jury service. The very same people who attended a victory parade on the day of the Heysel anniversary.
Without the cooking the books, the EPL couldn't look at Mancini contract, which were the supposed revelations from der speigel post CASNo legal expert, but my view is this: the PL has gathered more "evidence" in the form of emails, spreadsheets and the like that have extended the time period of the allegations from the limited UEFA investigation to the full ten years. The PL and the club both know the evidence to prove or disprove the most serious allegations is external. The PL wanted it (and they know it exists because it was provided, for the limited period, at CAS) and the club didn't want to provide it (or will claim they made their best efforts but the externals refused). So the PL could either drop the allegations without seeing the counter-evidence, or just go ahead and refer the allegations knowing that, probably, the club miraculously provides the necessary counter-evidence at the panel. Clearly, dropping everything without being satisfied by counter-evidence would set a terrible precedent. I don't think the PL had a real choice. Explains the non-compliance allegation too, btw.
I think Stefan’s calm, somewhat cerebral, fact-based approach would just tie ‘Goldbridge’ up in knots. There’s no way he’d let himself be humiliated like that - Goldbridge is smart, making a good living out of spouting shite but I don’t think he’s the sharpest tool in the box.
Strange that the very people who demanded justice after Hillsborough have already decided our guilt in the comments, and frightening to think some of these could actually have been on jury service. The very same people who attended a victory parade on the day of the Heysel anniversary.
Still waiting for HMRC and the fraud squad to get involved.
After all we're being accused of cooking the books and submitting false figures.
Made redundantDoesn't Winter write for the times, so I'm not so sure about the tits
Exactly mate.Odd how the HMRC can go after Newcastle and the Rags but the PL had no interest… I wonder why?
Absolutely this.Can you imagine the amount of column inches dedicated to the outrage if Liverpool had been charged by UEFA for something, banned from Europe for two years, and then had to go to an independent appeals process who reversed the decision, confirmed that they had not cooked the books but still fined them mega-ding for non-cooperation.
The outrage about bloody UEFA attacking a British institution would be off the scale. David Conn would be deep-diving into the evidence, Zeigler and Panja writing uninformed "its not fair" articles, UEFA officials buses bricked etc etc..
And what did we hear.... tumbleweed....
Can you imagine the amount of column inches dedicated to the outrage if Liverpool had been charged by UEFA for something, banned from Europe for two years, and then had to go to an independent appeals process who reversed the decision, confirmed that they had not cooked the books but still fined them mega-ding for non-cooperation.
The outrage about bloody UEFA attacking a British institution would be off the scale. David Conn would be deep-diving into the evidence, Zeigler and Panja writing uninformed "its not fair" articles, UEFA officials buses bricked etc etc..
And what did we hear.... tumbleweed....
Their double standards on the champions league final in 2022, no issues with Real Madrid supporters accessing the ground but Liverpool and their history of causing chaos jumping turnstiles. Could you imagine the vitriol if it would have been City supporters delaying the start of a major final? Or Pep telling supporters to turn up without tickets?
We heard "Guilty!", and after CAS, "well, technically, and obviously, still Guilty!"Can you imagine the amount of column inches dedicated to the outrage if Liverpool had been charged by UEFA for something, banned from Europe for two years, and then had to go to an independent appeals process who reversed the decision, confirmed that they had not cooked the books but still fined them mega-ding for non-cooperation.
The outrage about bloody UEFA attacking a British institution would be off the scale. David Conn would be deep-diving into the evidence, Zeigler and Panja writing uninformed "its not fair" articles, UEFA officials buses bricked etc etc..
And what did we hear.... tumbleweed....