PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

deano ou812 said:
He’s more than just a whopper,but the fella needs medical help,when the hearing is done and dusted Harris unfortunately for him is going to be in a bad place mentally..
Click to expand...
i think he need medical help just full stop, him and alot of others have invested so much time and energy into their hatred of us regardless of what happens they are going to crash when the hearing is over regardless of how it goes, when we win they will nash their teeth and say its not fait, it was a swizz, it was a technicality etc etc but they will really have nowhere to go and nothing to do and have to find something or someone else to hate, if the worst happens they will say see i was right and once again have nowhere to go and nothing to do and have to find someone else to hate, its a looming crisis to them as they have nothing else to offer and that attention and potential revenue stream for all of them is about to go away really really fast and then what will they do?
 
mancboy said:
i think he need medical help just full stop, him and alot of others have invested so much time and energy into their hatred of us regardless of what happens they are going to crash when the hearing is over regardless of how it goes, when we win they will nash their teeth and say its not fait, it was a swizz, it was a technicality etc etc but they will really have nowhere to go and nothing to do and have to find something or someone else to hate, if the worst happens they will say see i was right and once again have nowhere to go and nothing to do and have to find someone else to hate, its a looming crisis to them as they have nothing else to offer and that attention and potential revenue stream for all of them is about to go away really really fast and then what will they do?
Click to expand...
Unless of course we have something else threw at us..
 
Cityfan1977 said:
Mad hat still going on and on and on now he is talking down Stefan , tell me is it not correct that email will not be enough for the panel to find City guilty.

@slbsn @Prestwich_Blue tell me if I am wrong, emails are not enough to find City guilty of the main charges.
Click to expand...
I would say that it depends what it says in the emails. CAS stated that an email suggesting that we could do x, did not amount to proof that we actually did x.

But an email stating that we had done x might be seen in a different light.
 
It wouldn't surprise me if the Premier League actually produced the fabricated emails in court as evidence as they are coming across as amateurish and clueless as of late, well actually not as of late but for the last 2 years since they accused us.

Whilst the Premier League and rival football fans accuse us of fraud, inflating sponsorship deals and fabricating figures, we announce news of sponsorship deals being extended with current partners and new sponsors coming aboard.

Sometimes actions speak louder than words.
 
Cityfan1977 said:
Mad hat still going on and on and on now he is talking down Stefan , tell me is it not correct that email will not be enough for the panel to find City guilty.

@slbsn @Prestwich_Blue tell me if I am wrong, emails are not enough to find City guilty of the main charges.
Click to expand...
Are people still getting worked up by the Harris alter ego?

Internet crackpot. Nothing more. Block and move on.
 
Cityfan1977 said:
Mad hat still going on and on and on now he is talking down Stefan , tell me is it not correct that email will not be enough for the panel to find City guilty.

@slbsn @Prestwich_Blue tell me if I am wrong, emails are not enough to find City guilty of the main charges.
Click to expand...
I read the evidence he posted on X and most of it was out of context rubbish. Some of it was based on forecasts which are just forecasts and aren't worth looking at. Others based on payments from ADUG which are are already explained in CAS. So he's basically spent days researching it and come up with no tangible evidence whatsoever. I put these points to him and he couldn't come up with a reply. Ignore him he's a nutter
 
mancboy said:
Maybe they have, but i cant see us going to arbitration if there is new bang to rights evidence, i would imagine our legal representation would have advised us to cut a deal.
Click to expand...
I mean after the 115 is done and dusted I wouldn’t be surprised say a year or 18 months down the line some other bollocks crops up for us to clear our name..
 
BerkshireBlue said:
I read the evidence he posted on X and most of it was out of context rubbish. Some of it was based on forecasts which are just forecasts and aren't worth looking at. Others based on payments from ADUG which are are already explained in CAS. So he's basically spent days researching it and come up with no tangible evidence whatsoever. I put these points to him and he couldn't come up with a reply. Ignore him he's a nutter
Click to expand...

If you didn't get blocked, you aren't doing it right :)
 
BerkshireBlue said:
I read the evidence he posted on X and most of it was out of context rubbish. Some of it was based on forecasts which are just forecasts and aren't worth looking at. Others based on payments from ADUG which are are already explained in CAS. So he's basically spent days researching it and come up with no tangible evidence whatsoever. I put these points to him and he couldn't come up with a reply. Ignore him he's a nutter
Click to expand...
He’s an idiot Harris a mentally disturbed one at that ..
 
deano ou812 said:
He’s an idiot Harris a mentally disturbed one at that ..
Click to expand...
i genuinely dont understand his pathological hatred of city, he has set himself up as some kind of bastion of moral integrity yet hasnt had a peep to say about any other case apart from ours much less the shady accounting practices employed by the rags and the dippers, and nothing about standard chartered either so his schtick just doesnt ring true, he just despises city and hes embarrassing himself with it.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
I would say that it depends what it says in the emails. CAS stated that an email suggesting that we could do x, did not amount to proof that we actually did x.

But an email stating that we had done x might be seen in a different light.
Click to expand...

Those emails may carry more weight but they would still have to prove it was actually reflected in the accounts, imho.

For example, the attachments to some of the emails consistently refer to the AD sponsorships as shareholder funding and, in the emails at least, it was never corrected by Pearce or anyone else. It means nothing, however, people mislabel things all the time. The only thing that matters is where the money came from and if the PL can prove on the balance of probabilities that it came from ADUG. I don't think they can.
 
Pam said:
State of this from the MUEN

www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk

Man City told when they will learn outcome of Premier League court case

Manchester City are waiting to learn if their challenge against the Premier League's Associated Party Transaction rules has been successful.
www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk
Click to expand...
It's actually from The Athletic but like all "articles" in the MEN it's just a couple of soundbites that can be read in multiple ways and then padded out with nonsense ramblings. It means absolutely nothing.
 
mancboy said:
more than likely the pl dont seem to be bothered about embarrassing themselves.
Click to expand...
Legacy of hubris.
Had everything their own way including appeals procedures.

Certainly the ones who pull their strings are not reliable PL members so is the penny about to drop with Mr M.?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top