halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 14,938
I've long suspected this could be the case. The way they changed the APT rules to entitle themselves to third party documentation also supports this point.
As did the change in guidelines to the PL rules regarding providing information halfway through the investigation to include a requirement for the club to get third party information "when able to do so" (clever wording when they know we were able to do so at CAS).
As did the challenge the club made against applying new rules to a historic investigation after the allegations were referred.
As did the commercial court hearing which stated that the PL had asked for information from external parties.
So yes, very likely that non-cooperation will centre around the provision of third party information, along with deliberately delaying the investigative process, which is something the PL accused the club of in the commercial court hearing.
Last edited:
