That statement was from the ex head of the FA not the former Chairman of MCFC.
Much like when he was in the Royal Box at the FA Cup Final when we were been presented with the cup, he was struggling to keep his emotions in check!
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Much like when he was in the Royal Box at the FA Cup Final when we were been presented with the cup, he was struggling to keep his emotions in check!
Bluesince1979
Well-Known Member
Yeah i agree.
I dont think for one second our owners are the sort to go all put attack. It would be a complete 360 on their normal way of doing things. I think they will just want an end to it all.
I would however hope that any future slander is jumped on from a great height
If they try to get us to pay a share of their costs, we should tell them to fuck off. You just know they will do that, the arseoles
The PL wanted Everton to pay the legal costs. The cheeky f*ckers.
If the PL lose against City the costs will be paid by the PL and other 19 PL clubs. That won't go down well with the Red Shirt Cartel clubs. :-)
What about legal costs?
This specific case is six years in the making, so legal fees on both sides are already estimated at tens of millions of pounds before the hearing even starts.
Expect whichever side 'wins' to make a claim for costs.
For context, the Premier League wanted Everton to pay the full £4.9m legal costs of their first PSR six-point deduction case from last season.
Everton's lawyer Celia Rooney told the appeal that those figures were “frankly eye-watering”.
However, an appeal board ruled Everton should pay £1.7m and the Premier League cover the remaining £3.2m legal fees.
Any costs being paid by the Premier League at the end of the City case would have to be spread across the 20 clubs which make up the league.
Man City hearing: Premier League 115 charges case begins
The hearing into Manchester City's 115 charges for alleged breaches of the Premier League's financial rules begins on Monday.www.bbc.co.uk
They have no self respect. The employer just wants clicks? Here you go, some click-bait nonsense.
Scott mcfc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Jun 2020
- Messages
- 622
- Team supported
- Man city
I breathe fine u tool
Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
Scott mcfc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Jun 2020
- Messages
- 622
- Team supported
- Man city
Suppose thats one way of us gettin our own back,hitting them in there pockets,ill take that
The PL wanted Everton to pay the legal costs. The cheeky f*ckers.
If the PL lose against City the costs will be paid by the PL and other 19 PL clubs. That won't go down well with the Red Shirt Cartel clubs. :-)
What about legal costs?
This specific case is six years in the making, so legal fees on both sides are already estimated at tens of millions of pounds before the hearing even starts.
Expect whichever side 'wins' to make a claim for costs.
For context, the Premier League wanted Everton to pay the full £4.9m legal costs of their first PSR six-point deduction case from last season.
Everton's lawyer Celia Rooney told the appeal that those figures were “frankly eye-watering”.
However, an appeal board ruled Everton should pay £1.7m and the Premier League cover the remaining £3.2m legal fees.
Any costs being paid by the Premier League at the end of the City case would have to be spread across the 20 clubs which make up the league.
Man City hearing: Premier League 115 charges case begins
The hearing into Manchester City's 115 charges for alleged breaches of the Premier League's financial rules begins on Monday.
nmc
Well-Known Member
What on earth is M Ogadon on about?
The Football Leaks material formed the basis of UEFA's action against City, but after finding the club guilty and imposing a two-year Champions League ban, UEFA's decision was then overturned by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) because the alleged offences were "time-barred" by UEFA's five-year statute of limitations.
Man City vs. Premier League: 115 charges, but what's at stake?
The hearing into Man City's 115 alleged breaches of Premier League financial rules begins Monday, and the ramifications could be huge.www.espn.com
Ogden. Never one to let the facts get in the way…..
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
This point will doubtless be addressed when dealing with costs at the end, given that section 61(2) of the Arbitration Act 1996 (assuming applicable here) expressly states costs should follow the event. City can’t be expected to help fund the other side in a litigation they have prevailed in, especially as if we lose we’ll have to pick up the tab (or much of it) for the other 19 clubs. It’s probably already been covered off between the parties, or is expressly provided for in the PL rules - unless it comes out of some nebulous pot, I guess.
Fuck knows!
Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,044
Water isn’t wet though.
nmc
Well-Known Member
They won’t because the Red Cartel won’t let them… and when this hopefully goes tits up for them they will walk away like it’s nothing to do with them…. It’s all that idiot Masters.
ayrshire_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2008
- Messages
- 6,614
Again it doesn't change my outlook. I'd expect a business as usual approach regardless. Club confidence, investment in infrastructure, it's just noise imo. It'll be a long hearing and the PL have a mountain to climb to prove guilt, they may do so but we'll see.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 12,904
Business as usual is not a £300m investment in extending the stadium & building a hotel.
I hope City say we aren’t paying a share of legal costs for effectively prosecuting ourselves
The PL wanted Everton to pay the legal costs. The cheeky f*ckers.
If the PL lose against City the costs will be paid by the PL and other 19 PL clubs. That won't go down well with the Red Shirt Cartel clubs. :-)
What about legal costs?
This specific case is six years in the making, so legal fees on both sides are already estimated at tens of millions of pounds before the hearing even starts.
Expect whichever side 'wins' to make a claim for costs.
For context, the Premier League wanted Everton to pay the full £4.9m legal costs of their first PSR six-point deduction case from last season.
Everton's lawyer Celia Rooney told the appeal that those figures were “frankly eye-watering”.
However, an appeal board ruled Everton should pay £1.7m and the Premier League cover the remaining £3.2m legal fees.
Any costs being paid by the Premier League at the end of the City case would have to be spread across the 20 clubs which make up the league.
Man City hearing: Premier League 115 charges case begins
The hearing into Manchester City's 115 charges for alleged breaches of the Premier League's financial rules begins on Monday.
And hopefully any club that wasn’t in the league at the time the charges were brought takes a leaf out of Leicester’s book and says they weren’t a PL club at the time so they aren’t either
Fanciful, but would be amusing
Remember when Stefan first appeared on talksport, he did pretty much read out the CAS verdict and align it to this case but all Jim White wanted to know was what punishment we get, they then put the headline out 'city financial expert says city will be relegated'.
When you notice all the media reports they all start with the allegations then lead onto possible punishment, not one report I have seen has gone into any sort of detail about the bit in the middle, the actual case itself.
I believe they are intelligent people and choose to ignore the CAS verdict and focus on clicks instead.
And a wannabe MIB
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
I wouldn’t mind but they don’t even need to read the full report. Just the bit that says we didn’t use disguised equity funding for sponsorship payments. And even if any of the brain dead cunts were to accept that we won on ALL the non time-barred charges, what makes them think it would’ve been a different outcome on the time-barred ones?!