You’re a weirdo who has that nasty habit of stalking people, and rather than debate the issues, attack the individual instead.You came back within no time, it's why I call you Keir you're basically both liars. Say one thing in the moment then do another. You can't bear him getting any sort of criticism.
The only other reason is you are actually Keir Starmer.
Anyhow wipe your fanny Kier you dont want tears on your new suit, I know it was free but getting fitted for another one is such a ball ache you have that free dinner to attend remember.
Until the laws change, he’s guilty of being naive, not corruption, as far as I can see.
Given not much else has happened since the election was won, this, along with WFA are the two avenues available for attacking him.
As soon as something major happens, this will be a damp squib.
Because the boss likes to look at themAssuming you're a bloke, why would you be looking at dresses anywhere.
I do and that isn’t being debated because Starmer took some gifts. Therefore you’ve got to wonder what the motives for attacking the WFA decision were. People seem to have moved on to funding of a private box at a football match.You don’t see 2m pensioners struggling even more than usual to heat their homes as major?
I agree the gifts is a bit of a storm in the Westminster tea cup largely driven by the fact he promised to be better/different. I do expect he will calm it down now and this will be forgotten about in a months time. Much like the infighting on Sue Gray. The WFA is not going away however….
It’s hard being in power, the scrutiny is off the scale. Reeves was accused of being naive in WFA… perhaps a bit of a trend forming if you look at it in the round - their ambitions writing cheques their current ability cannot cash. They’re learning and will get better.
Nail on head, or he/she has a medical issueYou’re a weirdo who has that nasty habit of stalking people, and rather than debate the issues, attack the individual instead.
You remind me of the child, that nobody will talk to, so you get your kicks by resorting to little tantrums.
Sometimes people need to stop and think before posting stuff on SM, soiling yourselves in public is not a good look.
And yet not one single poster has managed a no Hilts you are wrong on this because....., not one.North Korea Whataboutery.
Whataboutery about the Whataboutery about the Whataboutery.
You debate in bad faith and are PatronisingtotheHilt.
I wouldn't say this is a left wing forum to be honest. Maybe you are more right wing than you think, or maybe I am more left wing than I think?
Says you is ironic. You crossed the line in your “debating” style this morning. Hence you got dotted.There reasons might not be though. Argue the point not the poster people
He should send every household this
They moved on to the grabbing because its this week. Both are getting mentioned. Its the order they came about. Some Tories will use these stories for their own ends, christ knows why but that's always been the case from both sides.I do and that isn’t being debated because Starmer took some gifts. Therefore you’ve got to wonder what the motives for attacking the WFA decision were. People seem to have moved on to funding of a private box at a football match.
It’s almost as if people don’t really care about the pensioners and are simply interested in attacking Starmer,
Id say its more like a Grealish version of left wing, doesn't look like a left winger, spends a lot of time trying to cut inside to the more central position and occasionally find itself running over to the right hand side only to be called back by those in power.
If it’s any consolation, should I win the lottery, I would offer to pay for Starner’s box in return for reintroducing the WFA.They moved on to the grabbing because its this week. Both are getting mentioned. Its the order they came about. Some Tories will use these stories for their own ends, christ knows why but that's always been the case from both sides.
Sides is the main problem.
None of this is new. The only change is who is in power.
Just so we know where you and your tag team partners are. Is there anything this Government has done since coming into power that have improved things - anything?
Ha ha
But its him fitting the window for me ;)
And … he does it mates rates because when i do work for him he gets mates rates
Why should people being dishonest be protected, I haven't attacked anyone who doesn't give it out on here.Says you is ironic. You crossed the line in your “debating” style this morning. Hence you got dotted.
I have no interest in debating with your whilst you go on your mega insulting of anyone you deem to have the moral high ground over.
All that can be true whilst also coming across as condescending. You’ve seen it isn’t just me that has thought that this morning. Whether you’re arsed by that or not is your business.Why should people being dishonest be protected, I haven't attacked anyone who doesn't give it out on here.
I do post honestly and I accept I'm blunt. There are plenty of people I have never had a crossed word with on here. But the same posters seem to be forever at loggerheads with me. There is a reason for that.
If you honestly believe that constantly saying yeah but the Tories is not just a deflection from a biased poster who won't admit a wrong doing from 'his side' then just put me on ignore. I gave the Tories on here the same treatment.
We have been through this before, I don't post to change people minds, I post to either have a laugh or show the sheer hypocrisy and dishonesty in posters.
In reply to this and @hilts post I agree with both of you voting current labour does not make you left wing in my book.100% it is. About 60% of respondents on here said they were voting Labour, twice what actually happened. Although Labour are right wing so maybe it isn’t true ;)
I’m conflicted.
Yes it’s ridiculous.
Although technically he probably hasn’t broken any rules because it’s all been declared and it remains to be seen whether any influence has been bought, Starmer’s been incredibly naive if he thinks that accepting multiple gifts wasn’t going to come back and bite him on the arse. It should have been obvious to him that accepting that level of freebies at the same time as calling out the Tories for doing similar was not going to be ignored.
On the exclusion zone around abortion clinics , there was an interview on yesterday with some religious nutter who stands outside such places. He believes even if a woman is raped she shouldnt have the right to abort.Absolutely.
Renters bill
Sorting out the strikes
Binning off Rwanda.
Getting the riots under control.
Exclusion zones around abortion clinics
Off the top of my head…and they will do a lot more.
The thread for various reasons isn't going anywhere. The fact is you and another poster who did see his arse big time actually discussed how Starmer got it wrong.All that can be true whilst also coming across as condescending. You’ve seen it isn’t just me that has thought that this morning. Whether you’re arsed by that or not is your business.
What is doesn't do is get the thread anywhere.