US Presidential Election, Nov 5th 2024

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
AliBobbyJ said:
Michelle.
Click to expand...
No. Probably not Michelle. Smart of her not to run. Barrack would have had a slight chance. But hed have been running against an economic, immigration and cultural headwind.

As much as it was ignored here, the Issues were always 4 - 1.in favor of Trump.
Economy, Immigration, incumbency and foreign Policy were all pro Trump. And Abortion was Pro Harris.

She was always going up against a headwind. And she was probably the worst public speaker since Walter Mondale.

A Harris win would have been the greatest surprise.

Trump win highly likely
Trump Landslide less likely
Harris win possible but not likely.
Harris landslide was just not on the cards.
 
Last edited:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
WW3 started with 9/11.
Click to expand...
WW2 probably never ended to be fair.

Or WW3 began immediately afterwards and is still going in a sense.

Or did that end with the fail of the USSR and now we are in WW4.

I don't know but I do feel like the US was so brainwashed over generations about what Patriotism is and what America is that they ignore their very real challenges as a nation. They seem so have no real interest in coming together as one people.
 
Dax777 said:
No. Probably not Michelle. Smart of her not to run. Barrack would have had a slight chance. But hed have been running against an economic, immigration and cultural headwind.

As much as it was ignored here, the Issues were always 4 - 1.in favor of Trump.
Economy, Immigration, incumbency and foreign Policy were all pro Trump. And Abortion was Pro Harris.

She was always going up against a headwind. And she was probably the worst public speaker since Walter Mondale.

A Harris win would have been the greatest surprise.

Trump win highly likely
Trump Landslide less likely
Harris win possible but not likely.
Harris landslide was just not on the cards.
Click to expand...
True. "Michelle" was a forlorn comment. But at least she wouldn't have had the weight of being Biden's VP round her neck. And she IS a far better speaker.
 
An expected but none the less awful result for common decency. Maybe Biden should use those wide ranging powers bestowed on him by the SCOTUS to put the criminal Trump where he should be, in prison.
 
super_city_si said:
To be honest, she did talk about those things. She could have been more detailed but she did raise policies. Trump just lied and spoke absolute nonsense for 6 months. Where did trump talk about healthcare, job security and cost of living in any detail beyond “it will be the best ever”?

Ultimately, to me, the democrats biggest mistake was nominating a woman with darker skin.
Click to expand...
Unbelievable post. She lost because she's Biden's deputy and voters are tired of neoliberalism and the establishment. They weren't falling for the stories that were released this week about her secretly hating Nethanyahu.
 
Jam Tomorrow said:
An expected but none the less awful result for common decency. Maybe Biden should use those wide ranging powers bestowed on him by the SCOTUS to put the criminal Trump where he should be, in prison.
Click to expand...
Interesting to see what sentencing is handed down to him now. After his comments about enemy within, any judge would need balls the size of melons to give him anything other than a slap on the wrist.
 
AliBobbyJ said:
True. "Michelle" was a forlorn comment. But at least she wouldn't have had the weight of being Biden's VP round her neck. And she IS a far better speaker.
Click to expand...
Id agree with that VP problem. And yes, she is a fat more accomplished and better speaker than VP Harris ever was.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top