Pep's contract situation | 2 year extension confirmed! (pg1817)

[citizen_maine]

Any reason why we should believe this?

 

[Gaz (FMwkdsoul)]

Any reason why we should believe this?

your choice.

 

[citizen_maine]

your choice.

Ha - wasn't having a go at you mate, just wondering if the source was reliable or just some no mark

 

[Gaz (FMwkdsoul)]

Ha - wasn't having a go at you mate, just wondering if the source was reliable or just some no mark

take em all with a pinch of salt personally.

 

[Shazza458]

take em all with a pinch of salt personally.

The one year seems like it’ll be the length though

 

[Gaz (FMwkdsoul)]

Ha - wasn't having a go at you mate, just wondering if the source was reliable or just some no mark

hoping its inaccurate and its longer than that.

 

[blueparrot]

The one year seems like it’ll be the length though

Thats what they said last time. Complete guess,could be anything between 0 and 3

 

[mscenterh750]

The players have given everything to give us the best time ever , i am so very proud of them , the ones who go will go with all my love . Hate posts using the phrase get rid , disrespectful mother fuckers

115% agree with you on this kaz. People have very short memories of what these players and manager have given us. Like you say disrespectful motherfuckers.

 

[GaudinoMotors]

The players have given everything to give us the best time ever , i am so very proud of them , the ones who go will go with all my love . Hate posts using the phrase get rid , disrespectful mother fuckers

Nobody wishes to be disrespectful. So what would an acceptable phrase be?

Moved on?
Sold lovingly?
Allowed to seek pastures new?
Escorted to the Elysian Plains?

 

[Shazza458]

Thats what they said last time. Complete guess,could be anything between 0 and 3

Good point, pretty much all of his extensions were touted as being one year.

 

[Roy paul brother]

An appeal seems to be an unlikely option for either side according to our legal experts but if there was one it wouldn't be decided before the end of the season

Don’t think the Premier will but this panel is a lot weaker than the APT one, so might be
something in the decision that warrants an appeal on our side.

depends whos' available in 2026 that's isn't now and if the both think a decade and done is fine etc

Naglesman will be ,end of the World Cup.

 

[kaz7]

Nobody wishes to be disrespectful. So what would an acceptable phrase be?

Moved on?
Sold lovingly?
Allowed to seek pastures new?
Escorted to the Elysian Plains?

We let the oldies go with our thanks , as we have always done

 

[Stoned Rose]

I know “one year” has always been the touted length as each extension has approached and it’s sometimes ended up being longer than that.

However, given the current need to refresh one year seems a bit mental.

Let’s say Pep directs the refresh and decides on player x,y and z, then leaves a year later and the new kid doesn’t want/like those players?

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

I know “one year” has always been the touted length as each extension has approached and it’s sometimes ended up being longer than that.

However, given the current need to refresh one year seems a bit mental.

Let’s say Pep directs the refresh and decides on player x,y and z, then leaves a year later and the new kid doesn’t want/like those players?

It’s one year with the extra time to convince to to stay the following year too. It’s not worked out too badly so far.

 

[Beaker]

Nobody wishes to be disrespectful. So what would an acceptable phrase be?

Moved on?
Sold lovingly?
Allowed to seek pastures new?
Escorted to the Elysian Plains?

Nothing wrong with believing a few players are reaching the end of their time with us, I myself think it about a few. It’s comments like such and such a body is shit, get rid etc that is grating with people. These players have produced arguably the greatest period in the history of English club football and they should be treated with the respect they deserve.

 

[citizen_maine]

I know “one year” has always been the touted length as each extension has approached and it’s sometimes ended up being longer than that.

However, given the current need to refresh one year seems a bit mental.

Let’s say Pep directs the refresh and decides on player x,y and z, then leaves a year later and the new kid doesn’t want/like those players?

He'll just have to put up with them - the same as he will with the rest of the squad that are currently here - until he gets his own say in recruitment

 

[Stoned Rose]

He'll just have to put up with them - the same as he will with the rest of the squad that are currently here - until he gets his own say in recruitment

But why do that?

Why not just bring a new guy in, let him choose who he wants staying/going and avoid the situation you refer to?

 

[Mcfc1.9.8.0]

I know “one year” has always been the touted length as each extension has approached and it’s sometimes ended up being longer than that.

However, given the current need to refresh one year seems a bit mental.

Let’s say Pep directs the refresh and decides on player x,y and z, then leaves a year later and the new kid doesn’t want/like those players?

I would think it be done on the same grounds before Pep came no way the like of sterling and KDB were coming for Pellegrini they knew Pep was coming

 

[Stoned Rose]

I would think it be done on the same grounds before Pep came no way the like of sterling and KDB were coming for Pellegrini they knew Pep was coming

Good shout mate.

 

[Shazza458]

I know “one year” has always been the touted length as each extension has approached and it’s sometimes ended up being longer than that.

However, given the current need to refresh one year seems a bit mental.

Let’s say Pep directs the refresh and decides on player x,y and z, then leaves a year later and the new kid doesn’t want/like those players?

Minimise his say round the club in terms of players /squad/ recruitment if it is one year.

These are the players you’ll be working with type thing