PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I have never said that Pinto was relevant following disclosure. The additional 14TB of hacked data has been available years before the disclosure.
But you have continued to reference him, even though it has been pointed out to you on multiple occasions that following disclosure he has no relevance. You've been like a fucking broken record.

Merry Christmas
 
But you have continued to reference him, even though it has been pointed out to you on multiple occasions that following disclosure he has no relevance. You've been like a fucking broken record.

Merry Christmas
What's relevant is what the Premier League potentially got from him before disclosure, and that we don’t know.

Merry Christmas
 
What's relevant is what the Premier League potentially got from him before disclosure, and that we don’t know.

Merry Christmas
Fuck me, if the premier league got it off him before disclosure then surely they were duty bound to share it with City and their legal team during disclosure. Surely disclosure is not a a one way street. If it is a way one street it makes refuting the allegations so much harder as even our legal team are not playing with a full deck.

Can one of the more knowledgeable posters please let me know if my understanding is correct
 
Fuck me, if the premier league got it off him before disclosure then surely they were duty bound to share it with City and their legal team during disclosure. Surely disclosure is not a a one way street.
Of course, I’ve never written anything else. City knows, but we who are discussing here have no idea what evidence the Premier League has presented, apart from what comes from Der Spiegel.
 
Of course, I’ve never written anything else. City knows, but we who are discussing here have no idea what evidence the Premier League has presented, apart from what comes from Der Spiegel.
But the club are still not showing any signs of concern. I give up as you obviously want to labour what I think is a moot point
 
What's relevant is what the Premier League potentially got from him before disclosure, and that we don’t know.

Merry Christmas
It’s been said before a million times. The Premier League has proven itself not to be MI5. If they had evidence it would be leaked. It hasn’t been leaked. The slam dunk smoking gun doesn’t exist. If it did we’d know. The Premier League, their acolytes in the clubs and media leak like a fucking sieve when it’s “good” news.

No one is biting. Why are you here? Take your face for a shit.
 
It’s been said before a million times. The Premier League has proven itself not to be MI5. If they had evidence it would be leaked. It hasn’t been leaked. The slam dunk smoking gun doesn’t exist. If it did we’d know. The Premier League, their acolytes in the clubs and media leak like a fucking sieve when it’s “good” news.

No one is biting. Why are you here? Take your face for a shit.
Let's hope so.
 
It’s been said before a million times. The Premier League has proven itself not to be MI5. If they had evidence it would be leaked. It hasn’t been leaked. The slam dunk smoking gun doesn’t exist. If it did we’d know. The Premier League, their acolytes in the clubs and media leak like a fucking sieve when it’s “good” news.

No one is biting. Why are you here? Take your face for a shit.
Unfortunately, plenty are, and it's killing the thread. Round and round in circles with the same person labouring the same irrelevant point.
 
What's relevant is what the Premier League potentially got from him before disclosure, and that we don’t know.

Merry Christmas
Did Khaldoon not come out after disclosure with his body of irrefutable evidence remark? Is so, that means he has seen any new evidence above the CAS evidence, from whatever sources and thinks its a load of bollocks.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top