PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Jam Tomorrow]

Not sure who it was, but in response to the Blue who was verbally abused in the street when he was wearing his City scarf - I feel your pain bud.

Twice in the last few months I’ve been called a “cheat” by complete fucking strangers when I had my City hoodie on.

It’s genuinely bat shit mental.

Nothing has stopped me wearing my City colours out and about. Nobody has said a word to me, if they do I will happily engage them in a robust conversation about the merits of the allegations against our great club, failing that they will get what I have always found to an effective repost to anti City sentiments right back to my youth, a fist in the face.

 

[normskih]

Parole officer?

oh good heavens no

 

[jaiguruKun]

Good to see that prick Simon Jordan making a fool oh himself again on Talkshite suggesting that Barada decision to join United my that he knows what is coming regards City 115 Premier League charges. But not realising he was in charge of City's sponseship during the alleged period, before Jim Shite informed of this and good old Graham Souness suggested if United had done their due diligence on him may more likely to suggest his and City's are in the clear ! What complete bell end Jordon is !

I doubt he even knew who Barrada was before Saturday night.

 

[KS55]

Hand grenade or machine gun..... hmmm my mind's in overtime

Recording device under the table a better option.

 

[normskih]

I've come to realise over the last few weeks that Everton fans are fucking thick - directing their anger at city, but don't seem to realise their lovely neighbours are the problem, scheming with the other red shites and controlling the PL. They seem to forget that Liverpool objected to their new ground, and guess what, with the points deductions, there's a good chance that it will be the best ground in the championship - red dippers don't like competition.

To be fair, nothing was ever said until they had points deducted and it is mainly the same fan and I think it in jest however with the rest it isn’t. I hope to high heavens we get through all this and the PL don’t have a leg to stand on. I really hope our lawyers go to task on all those who have high media profiles who have chosen to speak out instead of keeping council until the hearings are over.

 

[JewelZee]

Nothing has stopped me wearing my City colours out and about. Nobody has said a word to me, if they do I will happily engage them in a robust conversation about the merits of the allegations against our great club, failing that they will get what I have always found to an effective repost to anti City sentiments right back to my youth, a fist in the face.

Be careful, your post will be deleted like mine were for advocating a good, old-fashioned smack across the face to someone who has blatantly crossed the line in terms of what they say...

 

[abu13]

Part of me hopes that the breaches are all put on hold until a PL regulator is in place and they can look at the evidence themselves, once they do they then hit us with 215 charges instead.

I always felt a little disappointed with the 115 and thought we could have upped our game.

 

[BlueMoonAcrossThePond]

IMO, Everton are being totally screwed by the current FFP regulations.

Yeah, it's their own fault, but still.. totally screwed.

I'm not an Everton fan and was routing for them to go down last season.

But this season, if they go down because of point deductions - especially more than the 10 they already have - is total bullshit IMO.

FFP as currently formulated is total nonsense and either needs to be scraped entirely or needs to be reconstituted to fit its original purpose, namely, to prevent clubs from ruinous overspending.

 

[KS55]

I really wish I had your faith in this independent panel of the Premier League's. The reason for my skepticism can be entirely summarised below:

Club Financial Control Body Adjudicatory Chamber decision on Manchester City Football Club

UEFA takes note of the decision of the independent Adjudicatory Chamber of the Club Financial Control Body (CFCB), issued today

www.uefa.com

"UEFA takes note of the decision of the independent Adjudicatory Chamber" (...to originally ban us from the Champions League for two seasons).

When a governing body creates its own independent panel, the one guarantee is that they'll ensure its genuine independence is at the absolute minimal level.

The adjudicatory chamber decides punishment based on the report from the investigatory chamber. The investigatory chamber is not independant, which is a flaw. In our case Leterme simply did what the G14 clubs wished. The adjudicatory chamber demonstrated independence in the very next case, PSG, also chaired by Leterme which reached a ludicrous decision that PSG were within the rules. Leterme again reaching a decision to favour the owners (in the guise of Bein Sports) who had just bunged a huge sum at UEFA for TV rights. The chair of the adjudicatory chamber was livid at this and appealed to CAS. Not surprisingly CAS just chuckled at UEFA appealing against themselves. Case dismissed.

 

[KS55]

I bet jordan was the kid at school with snot on the cuffs of his blazer

….and wank stains on his trousers.