United Thread | 2024/25

[jrb]

He really is a two faced, lying, deluded, Forest fan, making headlines up, and contradicting himself, just to get more views on Youtube, and to make more money.(from the Rag fools)

No link.

 

[ancoats]

I’ve said it on here previously but I used to live on a road in Davyhulme where a united player who died at Munich lived. United used to own a few houses in Davyhulme for players.

His surviving wife was given notice to quit the house one month after the disaster. Disgusted by the club she immediately moved across the road and lived with a family for a few weeks before moving out permanently. I moved from the road in 2007. The old lady who had taken the widow in, was still alive then.

I was told this story by a big United fan neighbour, he lived next door to the old lady, who was very critical of the club even though he had seen nothing but success in his life. He was absolutely fuming when Cantona got paid out for playing at the Munich families fundraising match in 98.

Team Eric

£90,000 bill for Team Eric

ORGANISERS of a fund-raising match for survivors of the Munich air disaster paid a staggering £90,000 to bring Eric Cantona and his team back to Old Trafford.

www.independent.ie

It took 40 years for the survivors and family members received £47,000 Team Eric got double

Disaster leaves bitter legacy

For those who survived that terrible night, the treatment they received from the club left a bad taste

www.irishtimes.com

 

[Onholiday(somemightsay)]

Funny as fuck that whoever owns that "1958" page is slagging off the current ownership...

The club kicked families out of their homes when players past away in the Munich Disaster...

Nothing has changed with them, They've always been complete scumbags, He can piss and moan all he likes, He's still the cretin supporting that shower of shite.

Reading through the list of misdemeanors of Scruffy Jim it's difficult to argue with any of them.

However, what they are still missing the point of is that the only reason any of this becomes a problem is when they stop / stopped winning.

No-one over there gave the slightest fuck about the Glazier's whilst they were winning. They are still unable to call out their most successful manager for forcing the sale of the club (regardless of how it was going to be funded) as he was too pig fucking headed to back down in a row over horse semen.

Fuck they guys in charge, Rat-Boy the sell out, the club and the Piss can................. :-)

 

[Mike N]

‘In times of adversity and hardship we all need to look at each other for the light.

It’s your choice.

It’s now or never.

No matter who you are, underestimate the fans and Mancunians at your peril.’

The 1958


Jesus Christ, cringy stuff indeed. This could have easily been written by our Scouse friends.

Not sure why we get a mention in the last paragraph?

 

[give it to gordon]

‘In times of adversity and hardship we all need to look at each other for the light.

It’s your choice.

It’s now or never.

No matter who you are, underestimate the fans and Mancunians at your peril.’

The 1958


Jesus Christ, cringy stuff indeed. This could have easily been written by our Scouse friends.

Not sure why we get a mention in the last paragraph?

Lol any true mancs support their local team not a team from Trafford.

 

[blue by birth]

1958 probably don't know the truth about the way the bereaved families were treated.
British press/media hide alot of the rags and dippers history

They should read The Lost Babes..
It tells the story of how the players and families were treated after the crash..
Sad the way they were dismissed from club owned houses and how badly the players who couldn't play were fucked off quickly

 

[bennyboy]

Incredibly damning on INEOS if this is true and just shows how utterly inept the rags’ new sporting directors are. Didn’t hire Amorim in the summer because the players wouldn’t suit his system and then let tent peg spunk £200m on more dross. Unbelievably hilarious

Are them 2 not rag pricks that put the boot into City at every opportunity.

 

[Vienna_70]

He really is a two faced, lying, deluded, Forest fan, making headlines up, and contradicting himself, just to get more views on Youtube, and to make more money.(from the Rag fools)

No link.

View attachment 141587

Good luck to him, I say.

I’d love to be in his shoes.

As the old saying (nearly) goes, there’s no fool like a rag fool.

 

[KentBlue]

You would have thought even the dimmest of rag followers would have cottoned on to this duplicitous prat by now.

 

[jrb]

Good luck to him, I say.

I’d love to be in his shoes.

As the old saying (nearly) goes, there’s no fool like a rag fool.

But he never goes to Forest or United matches.

And he wouldn’t be welcomed at either ground by the fans.

He might be a millionaire, but given a similar choice, I’d rather go and watch City instead of making a dick of myself on Youtube before, during, and after every match.

Money can’t buy you everything. Even when you how money, you become a salve to it.

In the future he will look back at his millions, reflecting on the fact that he hasn’t been to a United match.

 

[jrb]

The fans aren’t happy.

Peppered with the usual United self-righteous guff.

But worth a read.

The Integrity Downfall of Manchester United​

Jon Lyndon - Linkedin

President & Chief Executive Officer / Executive Technology Advisor / Top LinkedIn Strategist / Ex-LinkedIn

December 29, 2024

Manchester United is a name known worldwide, synonymous with football greatness, success, and immense wealth. For decades, the club’s prestige has been unmatched, earning its place among the most iconic sports institutions in history. Yet, in recent times, the very values that once defined the club seem to be slipping away—especially its integrity.

Integrity is about doing the right thing, even when no one is watching. It’s about maintaining strong moral principles in business dealings, showing respect and kindness to others, and acting in a way that upholds a legacy. Unfortunately, recent actions by Manchester United's leadership have cast a long shadow over the club’s once-proud reputation.

The Glazers, who own the majority of Manchester United, were joined in 2024 by billionaire Jim Ratcliffe, who purchased a 27.7% stake in the club for £1.25 billion. Since then, a series of decisions have highlighted a concerning shift in the club’s direction—one that feels at odds with its historic values.

In July 2024, Manchester United made the decision to implement widespread layoffs across the business, a move that drew criticism for its impact on staff morale. Then, in October, Ratcliffe took the step of terminating Sir Alex Ferguson's long-standing ambassadorial contract. Ferguson, United’s most successful manager, led the club to 38 trophies over 26 years, becoming a symbol of its glory. His departure from the club’s ambassadorial ranks, after decades of service, left many fans questioning the motives behind the move.

But perhaps most troubling of all is the recent decision to cut the £40,000 annual payment to the charity supporting former Manchester United players. This charity, established in 1985, helps players who gave their all for the club but are often left without the financial means to support themselves after their careers end. In contrast to the staggering wages of current players—some earning £350,000 a week—this £40,000 donation might seem like a drop in the ocean. And yet, this small but meaningful gesture of support has now been revoked.

Jim Ratcliffe’s personal wealth stands at $15.8 billion, while Manchester United’s revenue reached a record £662 million this year. With such vast resources, the decision to cut this modest charity contribution raises serious questions about the club’s priorities and values.

While Manchester United’s issues are not unique in the world of professional sports, it is deeply disappointing to see such a historic club seemingly abandon the principles of integrity. It’s often in the small, overlooked decisions that the true character of an organization reveals itself. And if these smaller actions lack integrity, what can we expect when it comes to the bigger issues?

Are Manchester United the only club where this is happening? Absolutely not. However, the case of Manchester United is especially frustrating, as it once stood as a beacon of excellence both on and off the pitch. Today, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to reconcile the club’s legacy with the actions of its current leadership.

In the end, integrity is not just about making headlines for success—it’s about doing the right thing, even when no one is watching. Unfortunately, it’s becoming harder to see Manchester United and integrity in the same sentence.

 

[mancityvstoke]

But he never goes to Forest or United matches.

And he wouldn’t be welcomed at either ground by the fans.

He might be a millionaire, but given a similar choice, I’d rather go and watch City instead of making a dick of myself on Youtube before, during, and after every match.

Money can’t buy you everything. Even when you how money, you become a salve to it.

In the future he will look back at his millions, reflecting on the fact that he hasn’t been to a United match.

He's a loaded dick




ooooo errrrrrr mrs

 

[mexico1970]

The fans aren’t happy.

Peppered with the usual United self-righteous guff.

But worth a read.

The Integrity Downfall of Manchester United​

Jon Lyndon - Linkedin

President & Chief Executive Officer / Executive Technology Advisor / Top LinkedIn Strategist / Ex-LinkedIn

December 29, 2024

Manchester United is a name known worldwide, synonymous with football greatness, success, and immense wealth. For decades, the club’s prestige has been unmatched

Integrity is about doing the right thing

one that feels at odds with its historic values.



it is deeply disappointing to see such a historic club seemingly abandon the principles of integrity

However, the case of Manchester United is especially frustrating, as it once stood as a beacon of excellence both on and off the pitch.

I took the poignant bits out and placed them in isolation for all to see, those absolute cunts deserve everything they get and more if that's how they think.

Let them rot and then when they have rotted salt the ground so they can't breed again.

 

[Vienna_70]

But he never goes to Forest or United matches.

And he wouldn’t be welcomed at either ground by the fans.

He might be a millionaire, but given a similar choice, I’d rather go and watch City instead of making a dick of myself on Youtube before, during, and after every match.

Money can’t buy you everything. Even when you how money, you become a salve to it.

In the future he will look back at his millions, reflecting on the fact that he hasn’t been to a United match.

I agree with you, but we all make choices in life.

 

[mancboy]

The fans aren’t happy.

Peppered with the usual United self-righteous guff.

But worth a read.

The Integrity Downfall of Manchester United​

Jon Lyndon - Linkedin

President & Chief Executive Officer / Executive Technology Advisor / Top LinkedIn Strategist / Ex-LinkedIn

December 29, 2024

Manchester United is a name known worldwide, synonymous with football greatness, success, and immense wealth. For decades, the club’s prestige has been unmatched, earning its place among the most iconic sports institutions in history. Yet, in recent times, the very values that once defined the club seem to be slipping away—especially its integrity.

Integrity is about doing the right thing, even when no one is watching. It’s about maintaining strong moral principles in business dealings, showing respect and kindness to others, and acting in a way that upholds a legacy. Unfortunately, recent actions by Manchester United's leadership have cast a long shadow over the club’s once-proud reputation.

The Glazers, who own the majority of Manchester United, were joined in 2024 by billionaire Jim Ratcliffe, who purchased a 27.7% stake in the club for £1.25 billion. Since then, a series of decisions have highlighted a concerning shift in the club’s direction—one that feels at odds with its historic values.

In July 2024, Manchester United made the decision to implement widespread layoffs across the business, a move that drew criticism for its impact on staff morale. Then, in October, Ratcliffe took the step of terminating Sir Alex Ferguson's long-standing ambassadorial contract. Ferguson, United’s most successful manager, led the club to 38 trophies over 26 years, becoming a symbol of its glory. His departure from the club’s ambassadorial ranks, after decades of service, left many fans questioning the motives behind the move.

But perhaps most troubling of all is the recent decision to cut the £40,000 annual payment to the charity supporting former Manchester United players. This charity, established in 1985, helps players who gave their all for the club but are often left without the financial means to support themselves after their careers end. In contrast to the staggering wages of current players—some earning £350,000 a week—this £40,000 donation might seem like a drop in the ocean. And yet, this small but meaningful gesture of support has now been revoked.

Jim Ratcliffe’s personal wealth stands at $15.8 billion, while Manchester United’s revenue reached a record £662 million this year. With such vast resources, the decision to cut this modest charity contribution raises serious questions about the club’s priorities and values.

While Manchester United’s issues are not unique in the world of professional sports, it is deeply disappointing to see such a historic club seemingly abandon the principles of integrity. It’s often in the small, overlooked decisions that the true character of an organization reveals itself. And if these smaller actions lack integrity, what can we expect when it comes to the bigger issues?

Are Manchester United the only club where this is happening? Absolutely not. However, the case of Manchester United is especially frustrating, as it once stood as a beacon of excellence both on and off the pitch. Today, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to reconcile the club’s legacy with the actions of its current leadership.

In the end, integrity is not just about making headlines for success—it’s about doing the right thing, even when no one is watching. Unfortunately, it’s becoming harder to see Manchester United and integrity in the same sentence.

what an absolute bunch of pish, for decades the clubs prestige has been unmatched, absolute drivel

 

[Paladin]

The Integrity Downfall of Manchester United​

Jon Lyndon - Linkedin

President & Chief Executive Officer / Executive Technology Advisor / Top LinkedIn Strategist / Ex-LinkedIn

December 29, 2024

Manchester United is a name known worldwide, synonymous with football greatness, success, and immense wealth. For decades, the club’s prestige has been unmatched, earning its place among the most iconic sports institutions in history. Yet, in recent times, the very values that once defined the club seem to be slipping away—especially its integrity.

Integrity is about doing the right thing, even when no one is watching. It’s about maintaining strong moral principles in business dealings, showing respect and kindness to others, and acting in a way that upholds a legacy. Unfortunately, recent actions by Manchester United's leadership have cast a long shadow over the club’s once-proud reputation.

How did this banner align with your "strong moral principles of showing respect and kindness to others". This went up at the ground in 2002. I believe it was removed for one day, when City honoured your Munich anniversary impeccably, and was removed permanently by City's success in 2011.

So your integrity has been non-existent since at least 2002, and that's not even mentioning hundreds of other misdemeanours that preceded and succeeded this.

Integrity? I don't think so.

 

[BamberBridgeBlue]

How did this banner align with your "strong moral principles of showing respect and kindness to others". This went up at the ground in 2002. I believe it was removed for one day, when City honoured your Munich anniversary impeccably, and was removed permanently by City's success in 2011.

So your integrity has been non-existent since at least 2002, and that's not even mentioning hundreds of other misdemeanours that preceded and succeeded this.

Integrity? I don't think so.

Does anybody recall the MSM build up to the Munich anniversary fixture? They already had their narrative set on how City fans would be disrespectful and chant through the silence. Apparently we had fans planning to set off fireworks during the silence.

One of my proudest days to be a City fan. Gave them fuck all to write about.

These days they’d just make it up if it didn’t happen.

 

[Onholiday(somemightsay)]

The fans aren’t happy.

Peppered with the usual United self-righteous guff.

But worth a read.

The Integrity Downfall of Manchester United​

Jon Lyndon - Linkedin

President & Chief Executive Officer / Executive Technology Advisor / Top LinkedIn Strategist / Ex-LinkedIn

December 29, 2024

Manchester United is a name known worldwide, synonymous with football greatness, success, and immense wealth. For decades, the club’s prestige has been unmatched, earning its place among the most iconic sports institutions in history. Yet, in recent times, the very values that once defined the club seem to be slipping away—especially its integrity.

Integrity is about doing the right thing, even when no one is watching. It’s about maintaining strong moral principles in business dealings, showing respect and kindness to others, and acting in a way that upholds a legacy. Unfortunately, recent actions by Manchester United's leadership have cast a long shadow over the club’s once-proud reputation.

The Glazers, who own the majority of Manchester United, were joined in 2024 by billionaire Jim Ratcliffe, who purchased a 27.7% stake in the club for £1.25 billion. Since then, a series of decisions have highlighted a concerning shift in the club’s direction—one that feels at odds with its historic values.

In July 2024, Manchester United made the decision to implement widespread layoffs across the business, a move that drew criticism for its impact on staff morale. Then, in October, Ratcliffe took the step of terminating Sir Alex Ferguson's long-standing ambassadorial contract. Ferguson, United’s most successful manager, led the club to 38 trophies over 26 years, becoming a symbol of its glory. His departure from the club’s ambassadorial ranks, after decades of service, left many fans questioning the motives behind the move.

But perhaps most troubling of all is the recent decision to cut the £40,000 annual payment to the charity supporting former Manchester United players. This charity, established in 1985, helps players who gave their all for the club but are often left without the financial means to support themselves after their careers end. In contrast to the staggering wages of current players—some earning £350,000 a week—this £40,000 donation might seem like a drop in the ocean. And yet, this small but meaningful gesture of support has now been revoked.

Jim Ratcliffe’s personal wealth stands at $15.8 billion, while Manchester United’s revenue reached a record £662 million this year. With such vast resources, the decision to cut this modest charity contribution raises serious questions about the club’s priorities and values.

While Manchester United’s issues are not unique in the world of professional sports, it is deeply disappointing to see such a historic club seemingly abandon the principles of integrity. It’s often in the small, overlooked decisions that the true character of an organization reveals itself. And if these smaller actions lack integrity, what can we expect when it comes to the bigger issues?

Are Manchester United the only club where this is happening? Absolutely not. However, the case of Manchester United is especially frustrating, as it once stood as a beacon of excellence both on and off the pitch. Today, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to reconcile the club’s legacy with the actions of its current leadership.

In the end, integrity is not just about making headlines for success—it’s about doing the right thing, even when no one is watching. Unfortunately, it’s becoming harder to see Manchester United and integrity in the same sentence.

No idea who this guy is but upon first read;

1 - That opening paragraph shows up pretty much everything that is wrong and why they are in the mess - the self-entitlement and being stuck so far up your own arse that self-awareness is now only a gift bestowed on others.

2 - Still no calling out Ferguson for forcing the sale of the club and then happily remaining on the payroll for a couple of million quid a year from the point of retirement.

3 - The use of the term 'integrity' to describe them is laughable - ever since I have been alive they'd have sold their own grandmother for a soggy Wotsit the fuckers ...........

 

[Onholiday(somemightsay)]

How did this banner align with your "strong moral principles of showing respect and kindness to others". This went up at the ground in 2002. I believe it was removed for one day, when City honoured your Munich anniversary impeccably, and was removed permanently by City's success in 2011.

So your integrity has been non-existent since at least 2002, and that's not even mentioning hundreds of other misdemeanours that preceded and succeeded this.

Integrity? I don't think so.

Not disputing the above - I was there and I completely don't remember the banner being remov for that game............

 

[lefty goldblatt]

There is nothing to suggest Mainoo is any more than an average player. He's like that other flop Lingard. A couple of decent games for England against pub teams apparenty makes someone world class. Rashford was amazingly over-rated. Being fast doesn't make a player world class.

The daft cunts were comparing him to Seedorf last season smh

Tbf, Mrs Seedorf does track back, and makes lovely waffles