By kicking over it! ;)So, our "geriatric" midfield outplayed Chelsea's shiny 300m midfield. How come?
Eh??Gvardiol was poor.
Oh, and just one more thing, this is from sky sports, you know, the neutral impartial media outlet who had to apologise live on air for airing a slanderous statement that seems to flow so freely from their red cartel infested mouths at will.
View attachment 144411
View attachment 144412
you could almost think gvardiol shagged his wife but not a fucking chance hes marriedOnly 36 pages. Most of that generated by Bluewars II baiting.
Would have been 130 by now if lost. Annoying.
Lol. Football isn't for everyone.Gvardiol was poor.
A bar is were you'd find the most logical reasoning of course.
Wonderful footballerStones coming on made us look like a proper unit again. That can’t be overlooked
I thought it was his best game for ages but he is suspect at times one on one at the back. He doesn’t have the defensive instincts of Ake.He must...Such a bizarre post.
He was the best player on the pitch.
khusanov doesnt even speak english but knows that gary neville is a ****
I said he was anonymous today . You think he wasn't.?Are you saying he’s a flat track bully?
a bit of an arse? Thats like saying the grand canyon is a bit of a holeNeville is a bit of an arse. Carragher is a thick bitter Scouse ****.
Again, why was he poor?Digging?? If you thought he was excellent congrats to you.
You've just watched Bernardo play in defence, midfield, upfront, starting the press and picking up from ederson and you think Gvardiol was the best player on the pitch, lool! Bunch of jokers!He must...Such a bizarre post.
He was the best player on the pitch.