You can edit your post... use the 3 dots.Sorry should have read APT challenge.
You can edit your post... use the 3 dots.Sorry should have read APT challenge.
So, 4 PL clubs then? From memory I don't think it included Southampton.Here you are, maybe a shade over 3.
List of owners of English football clubs - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Not to mention the piddling amount of the advantage.Tenuous in the extreme and too remote from a causation perspective.
A question for our legal friends. Aren't arbitration proceedings supposed to be confidential? Why have the PL been writing to all the PL clubs about City's challenge to the new APT rules at all?
Because they are a bunch of cnuts especially that yes man masters..A question for our legal friends. Aren't arbitration proceedings supposed to be confidential? Why have the PL been writing to all the PL clubs about City's challenge to the new APT rules at all?
Because the PL is actually owned by the 20 clubs, each having one share, so an arbitration being brought against the PL's rules is effectively being brought against the other clubs.
Ah, the old c and v mistype. Happens more as you get cery much older. What a silly bunt.
This is conflating the Rule X arbitrations (confidential) and the challenge brought to the High Court and CoA regarding the Rules X arbitrations. No judgment of the Rule X arbitration was ever made public in that case.
if anyNot to mention the piddling amount of the advantage.
Not really correct - it is a claim vs the PL regardless of the shareholdings.Because the PL is actually owned by the 20 clubs, each having one share, so an arbitration being brought against the PL's rules is effectively being brought against the other clubs.
This is conflating the Rule X arbitrations (confidential) and the challenge brought to the High Court and CoA regarding the Rules X arbitrations. No judgment of the Rule X arbitration was ever made public in that case.
In terms of the APT2 case, the rules do not say the existence of arbitration is confidential as such. But the proceedings are "X.25 The proceedings of an arbitration convened under this Section X shall be confidential and shall be conducted in private."
Also, the claim is clearly a matter that is relevant to the shareholders.
Is this coming out of todays meeting ??why the delay to new concocted rules finally realised their unlawful
quick fix they said
yeah no vote but sticking with present psr for another season according to ssnIs this coming out of todays meeting ??