Been biking myself since the mid 70's and I 'only' have an old VFR800 these days but that's plenty fast enough for me. Some of the latest bikes are completely over the top with 200+ mph top speeds and prices wayyy over 30k with ridiculously over complex electronics and even 'downforce wings' now! There is a worrying decline in bike sales and most 'superbikes' are bought by older riders who from what I've seen spend most of the time posing to each other and never speed. Even those riders are now downsizing to smaller cheaper simpler machines. You're dead right it is bloody good fun and such a shame that youngsters these days will miss the fun I had growing up with bikes in the heady days of reasonablly cheap bikes and petrol, no cameras etc.
Oh Yes. Those two strokes we leaned to ride on back in the day which provided us with such cheap thrills will never be experienced by new riders today. I started on a Yamaha RD200 in 1975, and I was blown away, almost literally, the first time I opened the throttle in first gear. When the rev needle hit 4,000 rpm, it was all systems go and it's probably impossible now to convey what 22 BHP could feel like back then.
I bought a Honda CB400F after passing my test in 1976, 37BHP, a four stroke that didn't have the zip of a 2 stroke, but it was so much fun with the way the power and gearbox worked together.
I bought a Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 18 months ago. It wasn't because I wanted to pose and massage my ego with anyone, truth be told I largely avoid biker haunts due to too many fragile EGO's on bikes with stupid power, but for the simple reaon I had always bought middleweight bikes and as I was getting older, I thought I'd like to see what a powerful bike was like before I got too old to find out.
I'm pleased I found out what they are capable of, namely the relaxing way they can breeze past other vehicles on the road with minimal effort, but would I buy one again?
Probably not.
They are not as much fun as a middlweight bike, and fun is the whole point of biking.