United Thread | 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not assuming anything without it being based on first hand observation of your firm and consistent opinion on this particular issue.

Unless all your posts on this issue are you just wumming and acting deliberately contrarian... in which case, well done, you got me to bite and reeled me in properly!
I wish I was that clever.
 
when the bidding process was happening, they repeatedly asked for proof of funds, it never came, the thing which i dont understand is where the rags are coming from, they act like the glazers have never spent any money, yesterdays lineup was 580m , the prob is they have spent it on crap, its nothing to do with not spending money and they genuinely cant see that.
They also neglect to mention winning things with glazers owning the club
 
Yep I've made that point numerous times.

Qatar spent 6 months during the due diligence phase using the very best forensic accountants and auditors possible to scrutinise united's accounts and yet they still couldn't establish a clear picture of their finances or debt levels.

And yet the PL are quite happy to accept any figures that united's accounts department briefly wave under their nose when it come to FFP/PSR compliance.

It’s quite telling that they made one round of redundancies and recently made a further group of people redundant. If chemical Jim was provided with a proper representation of what the clubs accounts were when buying, why is he having to take further actions now to stop them failing psr. Surely it would have been acted on right away? I wonder if Radcliffe now has buyers remorse at having £1.5 billion taken from him to prop up the Glazers?
 
It amazes me how many people fall back on the it’s incompetence not corruption line every time VAR is manipulated to help the cartel. Even the biggest VAR cock up of all happened because they were trying to help Liverpool, but didn’t listen to what the on field decision was. One simple question about the rag game yesterday - same incident and decision at the other end, would VAR have intervened and denied the rags a penalty? Not a cat in hells chance, and that is why it is corrupt.
Total silence in the media?
 
Dermot will be on soon enough " we'll the first shift pull wasn't long enough there an unwritten 3 minute rule the second grab was just that all part of game young .made most of it
Move along nothing to see
The angle they’ll use is that despite being pulled backwards, Young fell forwards.

It’s one of the rare incidents where it’s 100% a foul and also 100% a dive.

That being said, the fact the penalty was given on field, it should have remained a penalty as whichever call was made was justifiable.
 
It’s quite telling that they made one round of redundancies and recently made a further group of people redundant. If chemical Jim was provided with a proper representation of what the clubs accounts were when buying, why is he having to take further actions now to stop them failing psr. Surely it would have been acted on right away? I wonder if Radcliffe now has buyers remorse at having £1.5 billion taken from him to prop up the Glazers?
Billionaire tax dodgers financial advisors/thieves would have gone through the rags accounts under due diligence surely?
 
The biggest thing about the pen was not that it wasn't given it's the fact that the VAR team didn't show the ref the best angle that it WAS a penalty. If that isn't cheating i don't know what is ?
We've seen these actions before a couple that spring to mind were the disallowed goal v the dips from Akanji and the spursy handball goal that they were awarded right on the goal line.

You're of course correct it's cheating in plain sight by VAR manipulating the referee.

I'd expect Webb when they do the round up of contentious decisions to say they got it wrong........ apparently that's ok then, fuck the fans and integrity, after all they'll pull out some shite figure of getting xx% correct.
 
I won't post a link to the Daily United. It's the headline article if you really want to read it?

It's getting very bitter at Old Toilet if the article is true?

--------

The Mirror claims that INEOS director of sport Sir Dave Brailsford and his staff have grown tired of hearing about how Ferguson dominated English football in the 1990s and 2000s.

Some of United's top decision-makers are even said to blame Ferguson for United's stagnation since his retirement in 2013, with the suggestion being that his failure to embrace modern developments in coaching and scouting caused the club to fall behind their rivals.
 
We've seen these actions before a couple that spring to mind were the disallowed goal v the dips from Akanji and the spursy handball goal that they were awarded right on the goal line.

You're of course correct it's cheating in plain sight by VAR manipulating the referee.

I'd expect Webb when they do the round up of contentious decisions to say they got it wrong........ apparently that's ok then, fuck the fans and integrity, after all they'll pull out some shite figure of getting xx% correct.

You’ll never get any transparency whilst PIGMOL are in bed with the red shirt cunts…..
 
I won't post a link to the Daily United. It's the headline article if you really want to read it?

It's getting very bitter at Old Toilet if the article is true?

--------

The Mirror claims that INEOS director of sport Sir Dave Brailsford and his staff have grown tired of hearing about how Ferguson dominated English football in the 1990s and 2000s.

Some of United's top decision-makers are even said to blame Ferguson for United's stagnation since his retirement in 2013, with the suggestion being that his failure to embrace modern developments in coaching and scouting caused the club to fall behind their rivals.

Clutching at any straws to shift the blame for the scums demise away from current leadership

They were happy to embrace the govan bully when they were successfully cheating
 
Var should use the same principles they use in Rugby league
All in angles that are available should be shown in real time and slow motion.
The conversation between the on pitch referee and var should be heard live.
Freeze frames should not be used.
It's the only way I would except VAR
 
So the referees are corrupt?
Yes and I can prove that.

Remember when Aguero got a retrospective ban for a supposed elbow on Winston Reid? The ref was Andre Marriner and his initial report said he saw it and didn't see it was a red card offence. He was asked to change that to say he hadn't seen it (so Aguero could be retrospectively charged) but initially refused.

He was then promised the League Cup final if he changed his report, so he did and he got the gig. I told people on here about that well before his appointment was announced. This came via a senior source at the club.

Then there was the Adebayor celebration after his goal against Arsenal. Clattenburg booked him for it, which he was entitled to do as goading the opposition fans is an offence. However the Head of the FA was an Arsenal fan called Ian Watmore, and on live radio on the Sunday morning, he said Adebayor would face a charge for his actions.

The problem was he'd already been booked for it, which would normally preclude a further charge so they had to find a way out. The involved getting Clattenburg to change his report to say he'd booked Adebayor for time wasting. So he could then be charged and got a suspended ban. I was at a meeting with club officials at that time and they were absolutely furious about it.

If that's not corruption then what is it?
 
I stand by what I said earlier. Premier League would be gutted if utd were relegated. They're a huge part of the cash cow. But we sound like the Dippers on RAWK when we say that there's corruption at play. If the refs are corrupt then they are not very good at it. Otherwise, why are utd languishing in 15th place?
To assist the rags so that they were in the top 4, the refs would have to act so corruptly even Scruffy Jim would call them out.
It would be like me winning the Euro millions, the fact I don't buy a ticket wouldn't matter.

They are that shit the refs can only help them so much.
 
Yes and I can prove that.

Remember when Aguero got a retrospective ban for a supposed elbow on Winston Reid? The ref was Andre Marriner and his initial report said he saw it and didn't see it was a red card offence. He was asked to change that to say he hadn't seen it (so Aguero could be retrospectively charged) but initially refused.

He was then promised the League Cup final if he changed his report, so he did and he got the gig. I told people on here about that well before his appointment was announced. This came via a senior source at the club.

Then there was the Adebayor celebration after his goal against Arsenal. Clattenburg booked him for it, which he was entitled to do as goading the opposition fans is an offence. However the Head of the FA was an Arsenal fan called Ian Watmore, and on live radio on the Sunday morning, he said Adebayor would face a charge for his actions.

The problem was he'd already been booked for it, which would normally preclude a further charge so they had to find a way out. The involved getting Clattenburg to change his report to say he'd booked Adebayor for time wasting. So he could then be charged and got a suspended ban. I was at a meeting with club officials at that time and they were absolutely furious about it.

If that's not corruption then what is it?
It’s obvious for all fans of teams that aren’t favoured ie rags, dippers, arse and to a point spurs that it’s corruption. I know lots of fans from several different clubs, none of the above, that feel exactly the same way.
 
Yes and I can prove that.

Remember when Aguero got a retrospective ban for a supposed elbow on Winston Reid? The ref was Andre Marriner and his initial report said he saw it and didn't see it was a red card offence. He was asked to change that to say he hadn't seen it (so Aguero could be retrospectively charged) but initially refused.

He was then promised the League Cup final if he changed his report, so he did and he got the gig. I told people on here about that well before his appointment was announced. This came via a senior source at the club.

Then there was the Adebayor celebration after his goal against Arsenal. Clattenburg booked him for it, which he was entitled to do as goading the opposition fans is an offence. However the Head of the FA was an Arsenal fan called Ian Watmore, and on live radio on the Sunday morning, he said Adebayor would face a charge for his actions.

The problem was he'd already been booked for it, which would normally preclude a further charge so they had to find a way out. The involved getting Clattenburg to change his report to say he'd booked Adebayor for time wasting. So he could then be charged and got a suspended ban. I was at a meeting with club officials at that time and they were absolutely furious about it.

If that's not corruption then what is it?
It's phenomenal what we've won in the cartel controlled era.Govan won 13 Premier League's with numerous late winners in "Fergie time" which was lauded in the media when in reality it was downright fucking cheating. If you need anymore visual confirmation just watch them v Arsenal with that bastard Mike Riley in charge.
Football is for everyone not just these wankers and their freeloading media shills !
 
Yes and I can prove that.

Remember when Aguero got a retrospective ban for a supposed elbow on Winston Reid? The ref was Andre Marriner and his initial report said he saw it and didn't see it was a red card offence. He was asked to change that to say he hadn't seen it (so Aguero could be retrospectively charged) but initially refused.

He was then promised the League Cup final if he changed his report, so he did and he got the gig. I told people on here about that well before his appointment was announced. This came via a senior source at the club.

Then there was the Adebayor celebration after his goal against Arsenal. Clattenburg booked him for it, which he was entitled to do as goading the opposition fans is an offence. However the Head of the FA was an Arsenal fan called Ian Watmore, and on live radio on the Sunday morning, he said Adebayor would face a charge for his actions.

The problem was he'd already been booked for it, which would normally preclude a further charge so they had to find a way out. The involved getting Clattenburg to change his report to say he'd booked Adebayor for time wasting. So he could then be charged and got a suspended ban. I was at a meeting with club officials at that time and they were absolutely furious about it.

If that's not corruption then what is it?
Still my favourite ever goal celebration. There was a thread on here with the Arse fans fury shown in slow motion - it was hilarious and should be in the Classic Thread section.

Ps. Great post PB - the cartel clubs have a lot to answer for.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top