Could that picture not apply to either party?
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Testing their new AI subscription.
They should be asking for their money back, not up to their usual standards.
So a betting company know the results of the 115 case before the 2 main parties?
They are just milking the expectations of suggested timing for their own PR and profile exposure. Something they always do, and do pretty well. People are reading way too much into it.
Brendan110_0
Well-Known Member
We'll have fusion working before this verdict is out.
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
Spot on. They’ll have both outcomes covered for sure.
Much more significant is what Ornstein said. He’s well connected and if City have told him we’re confident at such a late stage in the process then that could indicate that the club know the outcome.
Maybe, but the image doing the rounds now doesn't cover either.
It does however remind everyone PP is around.
No.. that’s what I said?
Not personal to you but a lot are taking it as a "sign" we have won.
You forget the £13m team…..the most expensive ever built at the time (88/89). Obviously preceding the floatation
That £13m the spent in 2 seasons which I think was (can’t remember exactly how much) over 80% of their turnover for those 2 years
Pretty much all borrowed from the bank if memory serves
The further organic injection of cash did indeed come from floating, which circumnavigated the rules at the time
They got more organic cash from 1992 onwards with the deal they struck with Arse, Liverpool, Everton, Spurs & the Prem. Obviously an organic influence & increase in revenue
Then the G14 decided they wanted another organic decision on how to widen the gap between themselves & the rest with CL top 3 (then 4)
So that’s 4 examples of how to grow organically without even mentioning the abolishment of sharing gate receipts in the 80’s
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 19,990
Except he didn't say he'd heard anything new. He just reiterated the clubs initial stance
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
I never said that he had. I just happen to think that the club have re-iterated that stance to him very recently and considering the hearing ended over 2 months ago, I think that could be significant. You can't tell me that the club are totally in the dark at such a late stage.
Uncle Wally One Ball
Well-Known Member
That isnt what he is saying is it? He said they will be filming 2 adverts, one for being cleared and one for being found guilty
Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,504
Exactly my view, no way imo was it a coincidence that Ornstein happened to make those comments.
Who cares they like everyone else do not know the verdict.
Uncle Wally One Ball
Well-Known Member
They arent claiming to are they? Hence filming 2 adverts, one for either verdict
LangleyBlue1970
Well-Known Member
That was fucking quality by PP. Same with the Tottenham one when their greats all started to be Blues. Their ads are funny.Their PR is outstanding, they have my total respect for that...
