PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Silva2021 said:
Well let that be a lesson to everyone, I have been on the forum for 10+ years and can say with utmost faith Tolmie knows more then me.

But he does not know everything, I am sure all information is passed on in good faith, but do not hang your hat on it, the reality is he is not that high on the food chain.

We should appreciate the knowledge but be realistic
Click to expand...

He posted a video. The rest was imagined by yourselves. He got nothing wrong.
 
Damocles said:
He posted a video. The rest was imagined by yourselves. He got nothing wrong.
Click to expand...

:) That's a pretty disingenuous description, tbf.

Personally, I enjoyed yesterday, don't get me wrong, but a lot of people won't have and I can understand why. A simple "you imagined it" won't really cut it, I don't think, for people who are worried about the upcoming judgment and who come to this thread (as I have said many times to anyone who listens) because it's the best (the only) source of actual information explaining what is going on.

Letting the misinterpretation of the video persist for so long was not a great look for the forum, imho, or for this thread, @tolmie's hairdoo himself, or the mods for that matter .

All imho.
 
Morning

For anyone interested. I have an update on my ongoing civil case.
Not as interesting as this but case in front of jury later this yr planned.
Judge has told them should they lose they will be liable for our costs circa 50k as well as damages.
Value of claim is nowhere near that figure so potentially good news as it puts them under pressure to negotiate unless they want to take the chance of going to court. Jeopardy on both sides of course but I am confident having seen there disclosure.
i will keep you posted.
 
Last edited:
halfcenturyup said:
:) That's a pretty disingenuous description, tbf.

Personally, I enjoyed yesterday, don't get me wrong, but a lot of people won't have and I can understand why. A simple "you imagined it" won't really cut it, I don't think, for people who are worried about the upcoming judgment and who come to this thread (as I have said many times to anyone who listens) because it's the best (the only) source of actual information explaining what is going on.

Letting the misinterpretation of the video persist for so long was not a great look for the forum, imho, or for this thread, @tolmie's hairdoo himself, or the mods for that matter .

All imho.
Click to expand...
I partially agree with you mate. I don’t really care how this thread looks as it’s looked a bit daft a number of times. Whilst it is the best source for real information and informed opinion that probably represents 20% of the content, the rest is fluff.
It does feel that posting that video was ill judged based on the information behind it. A soft sign yes, but hardly what a great many of us interpreted it as. Don’t really know what the mods could have done differently.
Anyway, at least yesterday wasn’t about negative news.
 
halfcenturyup said:
:) That's a pretty disingenuous description, tbf.

Personally, I enjoyed yesterday, don't get me wrong, but a lot of people won't have and I can understand why. A simple "you imagined it" won't really cut it, I don't think, for people who are worried about the upcoming judgment and who come to this thread (as I have said many times to anyone who listens) because it's the best (the only) source of actual information explaining what is going on.

Letting the misinterpretation of the video persist for so long was not a great look for the forum, imho, or for this thread, @tolmie's hairdoo himself, or the mods for that matter .

All imho.
Click to expand...
I’m really glad I was busy working yesterday so missed all the “excitement”, lol.
 
halfcenturyup said:
Letting the misinterpretation of the video persist for so long was not a great look for the forum, imho, or for this thread, @tolmie's hairdoo himself, or the mods for that matter .
Click to expand...
I think that’s a bit harsh! FWIW, I did say that I didn’t think any announcement was imminent, but what did you realistically expect us to do? Remove the video and all subsequent replies, and then lock the thread to prevent all the inevitable posts asking what had been said/why it’d been deleted?!

It was just a bit of levity whilst we await any actual developments, I wouldn’t take it too seriously. There are some excellent contributions to this thread from learned members (like @slbsn, @Chris in London, @petrusha, @gordondaviesmoustache amongst others) but much of the rest of it is just rumour, speculation, and general daftness. Given the almost complete wall of silence from all parties surrounding the case, it would be a fairly short, dull thread if we just stuck to the hard facts.
 
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
Morning

For anyone interested. I have an update on my ongoing civil case.
Not as interesting as this but case in front of jury later this yr planned.
Judge has told them should they lose they will be liable for our costs circa 50k as well as damages.
Value of claim is nowhere near that figure so potentially good news as it puts them under pressure to negotiate unless they want to take the chance of going to court. Jeopardy on both sides of course but I am confident having seen there disclosure.
i will keep you posted.
Click to expand...

That’s great news mate, is there a date of a court hearing just so you can see when it’s likely to be resolved by. If they have months, they’ll likely wait until then from my experience.
 
Last edited:
Ric said:
I think that’s a bit harsh! FWIW, I did say that I didn’t think any announcement was imminent, but what did you realistically expect us to do? Remove the video and all subsequent replies, and then lock the thread to prevent all the inevitable posts asking what had been said/why it’d been deleted?!

It was just a bit of levity whilst we await any actual developments, I wouldn’t take it too seriously. There are some excellent contributions to this thread from learned members (like @slbsn, @Chris in London, @petrusha, @gordondaviesmoustache amongst others) but much of the rest of it is just rumour, speculation, and general daftness. Given the almost complete wall of silence from all parties surrounding the case, it would be a fairly short, dull thread if we just stuck to the hard facts.
Click to expand...
Think you missed out @halfcenturyup
 
Ric said:
I think that’s a bit harsh! FWIW, I did say that I didn’t think any announcement was imminent, but what did you realistically expect us to do? Remove the video and all subsequent replies, and then lock the thread to prevent all the inevitable posts asking what had been said/why it’d been deleted?!

It was just a bit of levity whilst we await any actual developments, I wouldn’t take it too seriously. There are some excellent contributions to this thread from learned members (like @slbsn, @Chris in London, @petrusha, @gordondaviesmoustache amongst others) but much of the rest of it is just rumour, speculation, and general daftness. Given the almost complete wall of silence from all parties surrounding the case, it would be a fairly short, dull thread if we just stuck to the hard facts.
Click to expand...
Not sure I’d class anything from @gordondaviesmoustache as being an excellent contribution.
 
cheekybids said:
That’s great news mate, is there a date of a court hearing just so you can see when it’s likely to be resolved by. If they have months, they’ll likely wait until then from my experience.
Click to expand...
Also they have been given till June to decide if they want.to seek there own medical expert which they have not so far. They have had mine for about 12 months now
 
Ric said:
I think that’s a bit harsh! FWIW, I did say that I didn’t think any announcement was imminent, but what did you realistically expect us to do? Remove the video and all subsequent replies, and then lock the thread to prevent all the inevitable posts asking what had been said/why it’d been deleted?!

It was just a bit of levity whilst we await any actual developments, I wouldn’t take it too seriously. There are some excellent contributions to this thread from learned members (like @slbsn, @Chris in London, @petrusha, @gordondaviesmoustache amongst others) but much of the rest of it is just rumour, speculation, and general daftness. Given the almost complete wall of silence from all parties surrounding the case, it would be a fairly short, dull thread if we just stuck to the hard facts.
Click to expand...

Fair enough. Don't want to be telling you how to run your forum.

Ric said:
He was included in the “amongst others” ;)
Click to expand...

I like being amongst others, tbh. It reflects a little advice I was given in my early career: Keep your mouth closed and your bowels open.

I should have listened :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ric
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top