metalblue
Well-Known Member
This is tricky ground legally as to be offered such a thing somebody would need to plead guilty first and that might affect the right to a fair trial. IE, somebody could plead not guilty or guilty with the sway between either not relying upon the facts at trial but instead upon the idea that they could always avoid prison and just commit suicide.
This also impacts victims because do they want the convicted to snatch an easy way out of a long prison sentence? Personally I think you'd have to add a clause where victims could overrule such a decision. It then gets into a bit of a human rights nightmare to be honest.
I’d have thought it you were innocent of a crime you’d want to clear your name rather than opt for death. I don’t disagree it’s legally, and morally for that matter, complicated.
I don’t think victims have the right to choose the punishment and in any case the bar would, for me, need to be set very high on what crimes (and or type of person the perpetrator is) fell within the scope of allowing the perpetrator to opt for death - this wouldn’t be first offence stuff but rather they’d have multiple victims in their current or a long list of prior convictions so landing on victim agreement would be impossible. Let’s be honest how many of us shed a tear when the likes of Ian Huntley or Fred West get a little prison justice?