Some California producers can call their product Champagne.
US Tariff War
- Thread starter BlueHammer85
- Start date
Dubai Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2007
- Messages
- 15,423
They can if they were already doing so before 2006.
According to chatgpt
No, only sparkling wine produced in the Champagne region of France can be called "Champagne." This is protected by the term's status as a **Protected Designation of Origin (PDO)** under European Union law and international agreements. Sparkling wines made outside of the Champagne region, even if they are made using similar methods, must be labeled with terms like "sparkling wine" or other regional names, such as "Cava" (from Spain) or "Prosecco" (from Italy).
No, only sparkling wine produced in the Champagne region of France can be called "Champagne." This is protected by the term's status as a **Protected Designation of Origin (PDO)** under European Union law and international agreements. Sparkling wines made outside of the Champagne region, even if they are made using similar methods, must be labeled with terms like "sparkling wine" or other regional names, such as "Cava" (from Spain) or "Prosecco" (from Italy).
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
what about Babycham?
Don't think I've ever drunk it. The bottle was too small.
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
you shake on and spray it if you win a Scalextric race
grunge
Well-Known Member
Nope they can’t. Some try to get around the law by calling their sparkling wine “California champagne” but it’s not Champagne.
Champagne only comes from 1 area of France.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 69,681
Surprised Americans don’t just spell it Shampane.
idahoblues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Mar 2009
- Messages
- 21,530
grunge
Well-Known Member
Here’s a bit more info into “California Champagne”. Basically a legal loop hole that allows some legacy vineyards the right to use the name.
Generally speaking it’s cheap shit by the sound of it.
Which it doenst need to be as California sparkling can be decent.
vinepair.com
Generally speaking it’s cheap shit by the sound of it.
Which it doenst need to be as California sparkling can be decent.
The 100-Year-Old Loophole That Makes California Champagne Legal
For a bottle of sparkling wine to be labeled Champagne, it has to be made in Champagne, France and produced using the méthode champenoise. If that bottle is produced using the exact same method, anywhere else, it must carry a different name. The production method itself must even be referred to...
vinepair.com
FogBlueInSanFran
Well-Known Member
Ha ha so am I TBF!
FogBlueInSanFran
Well-Known Member
Fascinating — and complicated — article. Thanks for posting.Here’s a bit more info into “California Champagne”. Basically a legal loop hole that allows some legacy vineyards the right to use the name.
Generally speaking it’s cheap shit by the sound of it.
Which it doenst need to be as California sparkling can be decent.
The 100-Year-Old Loophole That Makes California Champagne Legal
For a bottle of sparkling wine to be labeled Champagne, it has to be made in Champagne, France and produced using the méthode champenoise. If that bottle is produced using the exact same method, anywhere else, it must carry a different name. The production method itself must even be referred to...
You know the old saw: “How do you make a small fortune in the wine business? Start with a big one.”
Toot toot hic
mancity2012_eamo
Well-Known Member
Where’s that then?
roubaixtuesday
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 5,718
- Team supported
- City
I think in the US you can label some US wines as champagne. Not in the EU though.
From Wiki:
The United States bans the use of all new U.S.-produced wine brands.[19] However, those that had approval to use the term on labels before 2006 may continue to use it, provided the term is accompanied by the wine's actual origin (e.g., "California").[19] The majority of US-produced sparkling wines do not use the term Champagne on their labels,[20] and some states, such as Oregon,[21] ban producers in their states from using the term
And yes, we should indeed expect Stilton tariffs.
RadcliffeRick
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 10,148
- Location
- Kuala Lumpur Via Radcliffe
- Team supported
- Manchester City since 2008 Chelsea before that :-)
Bordeaux I think.
mancity2012_eamo
Well-Known Member
Thanks.
mancity2012_eamo
Well-Known Member
I think Micheal Martin should slap a 200% tariff on the Doonbeg Hotel and Golf Course, while he’s still over there.
BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 40,610
Tesla, run by Donald Trump cheerleader Elon Musk, has warned US officials it risks being exposed to "disproportionate" retaliatory tariffs under the president's escalating trade war.
The electric carmaker raised the issue in a letter to the US Trade Representative's (USTR's) Office on the same day Mr Trump bought a Tesla car in a show of support for his close ally after a bloodbath for the company's shares.
Investor concerns, mostly linked to the trade war, have pushed Tesla's market value 50% down from its December peak - a hit of roughly £800bn.
The electric carmaker raised the issue in a letter to the US Trade Representative's (USTR's) Office on the same day Mr Trump bought a Tesla car in a show of support for his close ally after a bloodbath for the company's shares.
Investor concerns, mostly linked to the trade war, have pushed Tesla's market value 50% down from its December peak - a hit of roughly £800bn.