PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

bobbyowenquiff said:
Yes. I hope it is. But it is impossible to know for sure. Would Puma do a deal with the PL if City had lost the case? But as someone else pointed out Puma may have another motive, perhaps damage limitation. I also am surprised by the suggestion that the independent regulator is being scrapped. This could also be good or bad for us!
Click to expand...
I wouldn't read anything - positive or negative - into Puma signing a deal with the PL and rumours that the independent regulator is going to be scrapped. I doubt either of those have anything to do with our case.
 
Last edited:
As has been mentioned on here previously, and as happened with the CAS verdict, the parties get an advance copy of the verdict a few days before it's made public. This is so any obvious errors can be corrected. At that point there will almost certainly be leaks.

When Ian Cheeseman prematurely announced the CAS outcome, I'm pretty sure his information was legit, and not a lucky guess. I'd be surprised therefore if the formal announcement came completely out of the blue.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
As has been mentioned on here previously, and as happened with the CAS verdict, the parties get an advance copy of the verdict a few days before it's made public. This is so any obvious errors can be corrected. At that point there will almost certainly be leaks.

When Ian Cheeseman prematurely announced the CAS outcome, I'm pretty sure his information was legit, and not a lucky guess. I'd be surprised therefore if the formal announcement came completely out of the blue.
Click to expand...
Any indication about the information floating about suggesting either outcome? Or likely that the club and Prem have not received it?
 
International breaks come at an ideal time. Hoping for the best outcome.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top