PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

TedofChume said:
Bernado is the only outfield player to have been fit all season. He has run himself into the ground and is clearly exhausted.

He regularly runs over 15k a match, more than any other player in the league. I think he set a record against Liverpool in 2020 ofc12k and has regularly gone above that since, pushing 17k in one match. We'd be much lower down the league if it wasn't for him.

Despite his wife hating it here, he's always honoured his contract and given us everything, and you should see him dance at the victory parades when we sing his song, he loves it!
Click to expand...
Don’t waste your breath mate, he’s a WUM. As demonstrated in a recent David Silva thread.

Thrives on the attention.
 
mancboy said:
1 bn spent on the rags, 800m on the tarquins, same on the dippers, yes they are truly poor relations, this is what makes me laugh when people STILL think its about money and city buying everyone.
Click to expand...
Ahh, but they wouldn't have had to spend that much if not for trying (and failing) to keep up with us on the field. See, Manchester City, ruining football since 2008.
 
If we do somehow get away with it and manage to avoid relegation for systematically cheating and ruining football - all the current journalists and pundits should all resign in protest over such injustice. Every single one of them.
 
Given the likely, seismic repercussions of this decision, and, given the unseemly dispute as to who had won last time, is it beyond the bounds of possibility that the club and the PL would try to issue statements that were agreed or, at least, were consistent with each other ?

Much as we want City to go in for the kill if it has gone our way, I'm not sure any potential domesday scenario is in either party's interests.
 
Newman Noggs said:
Given the likely, seismic repercussions of this decision, and, given the unseemly dispute as to who had won last time, is it beyond the bounds of possibility that the club and the PL would try to issue statements that were agreed or, at least, were consistent with each other ?

Much as we want City to go in for the kill if it has gone our way, I'm not sure any potential domesday scenario is in either party's interests.
Click to expand...
That would mean that both the Premier League and City have finally seen some sense.
 
GRB said:
please can someone summarise - just logged in since this morning…
Click to expand...
Nothing new really. Oliver Holt has gone full tonto, and a whole bunch of nobodies on twitter think they are the new tolm. Other than that, nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GRB
Newman Noggs said:
Given the likely, seismic repercussions of this decision, and, given the unseemly dispute as to who had won last time, is it beyond the bounds of possibility that the club and the PL would try to issue statements that were agreed or, at least, were consistent with each other ?

Much as we want City to go in for the kill if it has gone our way, I'm not sure any potential domesday scenario is in either party's interests.
Click to expand...
Sadly we’re not about to bite the hand that feeds us even though I’d love us to burn their house down
 
MafeotulBlue said:
Blessing you with the real reason of City’s innocence. The statuette of limitations.

Click to expand...

while everyone else is focusing on the glaring statuette error let me take him to task on the other stupid error of a dictator trying to clean his public image, there is so much to unpack that is wrong there i dont know where to start but lets start with the fact that before he bought city mansour the good sheikh had no public image or need of one and certainly no need to cleanse it, its genuinely hilarious that the west is so arrogant that they really believe that the middle east, china etc etc really really need us to love them, we really need to understand that they quite simply do not give a fuck what we think and our ill informed commentaries on their culture just shows the ignorance we have and says alot more about us than them
 
Last edited:
Nephin Man said:
'Financial rules' is a euphemism for 'threat financial straitjacket'. The greatest irony is these 'rules' have been instigated by neo-liberals. It's the old adage of socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor. Have these rules eradicated cowboy owners from the game? How did Football survive for so long without these rules? And isn't self-responsibility and the jeopardy that comes with it the spice of life that has helped make football so popular?
Click to expand...
Wish I could have given your post ten likes, everything summed up in a nutshell, great post.
 
So day off today waiting for plumber to arrive, please announce it today so i can sit with a coffee and just relax reading all the hate towards us !! lol!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top