PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

They have won. Maybe not to stop a dominant football team but look how the club is viewed at present. It must have affected and will continue to affect the club’s recruitment re a new generation of fans.

Slurs are very hard to remove.

They have also won in slowing down the need for world class recruitment which as we are seeing, ultimately takes away the on field advantage.

I think they have won unfortunately.

Its doesn’t mean city can’t get back on top. The magnitude of our success has really boiled so piss. Hence the 115 backlash.
I must have imagined seeing more and more kids in City kits over the last few years then, and world class players coming and contributing to trophies galore.
 
You're all over the place. South East Asian one minute, Jewish the next. The problem with running two accounts at your age is that you'll forget which lies you've told.

I am giving this place a break now because I am getting fed up with the poor behaviour on here.
 
Point proven.
You jumped into a conversation unprovoked or requested where nobody was talking to or about you, to insult someone because about 6 months they called you out on a forum for lying about the personal life of a content creator.
I completely forgot the conversation even happened.
You're fragile as fuck mate, the Internet isn't for you.
 
I must have imagined seeing more and more kids in City kits over the last few years then, and world class players coming and contributing to trophies galore.
Thats a fine view.

Forward to now… the bogus financial rules will have and are having an impact on how much we can spend on recruitment. Instead of buying top drawer players we mainly buy players with world class potential. Nothing wrong with that but at times the squad is crying out for WC players.

Maybe you need glasses? -:)

Oh yea those ain’t city tops but dips and rags tops dyed blue. We have no fans, remember.
 
... and here come the leaks to the PL's favoured 'journalists'.

I wonder if certain PL officials are on some sort of financial retainer with their favoured mouthpiece's?
That piece perfectly encapsulates the greedy infighting that has led us to this point.

The media have created a money train and won’t be deterred to keep stoking up hate using fan rivalry for financial gain/survival.
 
No there won't be for the reasons I've just stated. It's ideological. There has always been a human rights lobby, Amnesty International etc who want the entire world to be modelled along the lines of Western European states
I think the anti AbuDhabi lobby falls into three categories:
1. Human rights campaigners. There are many in this group who are dissembling, using human rights issues to cloak baser real reasons. Many of them had never heard of AbuDhabi before the Sheik bought City and they did not campaign for human rights in the M.E. before.
There are, of course, some genuine campaigners as well as some liberals who seem to believe in a colonial model wanting to teach Arabs how to govern themselves, as you say, along western democratic lines.
2. Nationalistic Jews. Probably quite rare but there are some who are anti AbuDhabi simply because they are Muslims.
3. Outright racists who look down on people with brown skin. Some are just xenophobic others rabid. There is a pretence about being opposed to state ownership of clubs but they know really that City are not state owned but rather just reflect royal family influence. They didn’t think QE2’s horses were state owned, though.
None of these people will ever be convinced to change their minds.
I do not include as anti AbuDhabi people anti City fans called rags and so on. They are fine if they are genuine fans of other clubs and just prefer their own club to win rather than City.
US owners simply are pissed off that they cannot make the millions they expected since City hoover up so many prizes. They have resorted to trying to nobble City via the back door of the rules. They are almost as bad as the racists in pretending to have noble motives but with different motivation.
 
Last edited:
I think the anti AbuDhabi lobby falls into three categories:
1. Human rights campaigners. There are many in this group who are dissembling, using human rights issues to cloak baser real reasons. Many of them had never heard of AbuDhabi before the Sheik bought City and they did not campaign for human rights in the M.E. before.
There are, of course, some genuine campaigners as well as some liberals who seem to believe in a colonial model wanting to teach Arabs how to govern themselves, as you say, along western democratic lines.
2. Nationalistic Jews. Probably quite rare but there are some who are anti AbuDhabi simply because they are Muslims.
3. Outright racists who look down on people with brown skin. Some are just xenophobic others rabid. There is a pretence about being opposed to state ownership of clubs but they know really that City are not state owned but rather just reflect royal family influence. They didn’t think QE2’s horses were state owned, though.
None of these people will ever be convinced to change their minds.
You’ve missed the principal group out.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top