At last someone gets it as it is.
1) When carrying out DD our current owners discovered what the said to be “ potentially incomplete reporting of financial information”
Neither the club , UEFA, the PL tell us what that is save it covered 2012-2019 and UEFA and the club agreed a settlement of £8.6 million for FFP failures.
2) A couple of journalists suggest it concerned the transfers of Willian and Eto.
3) Subsequently the Cypriot leak told us that there were a number of “ questionable payments “ made by RA . Payments that potentially should have gone through Chelsea books. One such payment appears to be a sum paid by a company owned by RA to Hazards agent.
4) The revelations in those Cyprus leaks aren’t part of the matters Chelsea reported. A club statement said that in effect the club don’t know anything about these revelations , it was before the current ownership was in situ.
Of course it’s the club that has to own failures. But as you say without full engagement with RA matters become far more difficult.
Chelsea investigation which yes is still on going will have be looking a both aspects
That's an absolute fucking disgrace! Forget the charges, oreos?? Fucking yanks!!the cartel wanted Oreos over hob nobs...an outrage.
That’s fair enough but my last post was directed more at the poster who keeps suggesting that we self reported ourselves over off book payments to Hazard. Of course that is possible but when it comes to the info in the Cyprus leaks those revelations almost certainly aren’t what was submittedMost of the comments are about how this is playing out in the media, the different narratives being spun. Everyone gets it, there isn’t an appetite to label Chelsea cheats like they have with city. It’s not a Chelsea thing, it’s the hit job we’ve faced for years.
At last someone gets it as it is.
1) When carrying out DD our current owners discovered what the said to be “ potentially incomplete reporting of financial information”
Neither the club , UEFA, the PL tell us what that is save it covered 2012-2019 and UEFA and the club agreed a settlement of £8.6 million for FFP failures.
2) A couple of journalists suggest it concerned the transfers of Willian and Eto.
3) Subsequently the Cypriot leak told us that there were a number of “ questionable payments “ made by RA . Payments that potentially should have gone through Chelsea books. One such payment appears to be a sum paid by a company owned by RA to Hazards agent.
4) The revelations in those Cyprus leaks aren’t part of the matters Chelsea reported. A club statement said that in effect the club don’t know anything about these revelations , it was before the current ownership was in situ.
Of course it’s the club that has to own failures. But as you say without full engagement with RA matters become far more difficult.
Chelsea investigation which yes is still on going will have be looking a both aspects
Thats not the prevailing view mate.No one can convince me that we’re not within two weeks of a public announcement of the results of the independent investigation by now. As such, City would likely have already been informed. I think the club must know the outcome at this stage.
who backs the hedge fund romanYour club are the real cheats under your previous owner! your lucky your owned by an Americans and the dodgy hedge funds gang!
also known as St Marks day who we are of course linked toTo find out which day in April corresponds to the 115th day, we subtract the total number of days up to March from 115:
115−90=25
Thus, the 115th day of the year is April 25, 2025.
Therefore, the answer is:
April 25, 2025
So there we have it 25 April.
who backs the hedge fund roman
Your club are the real cheats under your previous owner! your lucky your owned by an Americans and the dodgy hedge funds gang!
That's the thing no one knows who theses hedge fund investors are!
They could be investing in other hedge clubs in premier!? It's why in America it's banned to purchase a sport corporation!!
Oh but media never shut the fcuk up about Man City with there witch hunt last few years by them and certain premier clubs..
Intended aim from day one , none of the cunts have been able to match us on the pitch so lets tarnish all their record breaking and achievementsThe fact that every **** and his wife think City are guilty is 100 percent down to the way the media have reported the story - none stop assumption of our guilt.
Cool. Just in time for the semi-final.To find out which day in April corresponds to the 115th day, we subtract the total number of days up to March from 115:
115−90=25
Thus, the 115th day of the year is April 25, 2025.
Therefore, the answer is:
April 25, 2025
So there we have it 25 April.
okYour club are the real cheats under your previous owner! your lucky your owned by an Americans and the dodgy hedge funds gang!
The drafting and re-drafting of the Judges's statement takes all the time. It will be as long as a book but much more complicated to edit. Every sentence will be poured over. This is a high stakes situation. Whoever "loses" this case could face commercial and personal reputational disaster. The Judges' cant afford to get even the smallest bit of their statement wrong. If they did it would destroy their own personal reputations. And then there is the tricky situation of how both parties communicate to the public what has happened after the result. The PR battle is almost as important as the legal decison.@slbsn on talksport this morning talking about the 115.
I think Stefan hit the nail on the head when he mentioned the process drafting and redrafting of the final report, ensuring no holes/gaps for the losing party to challenge the decision,
This must be taking longer than expected
Of course it’s the club that has to own failures. But as you say without full engagement with RA matters become far more difficult.